I. E. Ilyakova, O. M. Lizina, O. S. Sausheva. Juvenile Potential as a Social Resource for Economic Development in a Changing Technological Order

UDК 330.3

DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.113.028.202004.638-665

Introduction. The issue considered in the article is of relevance due to the innovative vector of modern social and economic development, as well as to the inevitability of transition to the new, sixth, technological order based on a knowledge-intensive mode of production. Processes associated with mastering emerging technologies actively proceed now in the world’s leading economies. The strategic competitiveness of Russia is limited by the state of productive forces and the level of development of industrial relations. To rectify the present situation an impetus that can accelerate the dynamics of economic processes is necessary. The aim of the study is to identify the role of juvenile potential in ensuring sustainable economic development, as well as to determine the conditions for its provision and implementation as a factor in the transition to the sixth technological order.

Materials and Methods. The research methodology was based on the general scientific methods (those of scientific abstraction, unity of the historical and the logical, analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, comparison and analogy) and the special methods of cognition (the integrative method that implies the necessity to analyze economic, social, legal and other prerequisites). The information base of the research was made up of official statistical data, legal acts, and scientific works in the field of human and juvenile potential.

Results. On the basis of the identified system of indicators of juvenile potential, an assessment of its elements and conditions of its fulfillment as a factor in reproduction of productive forces of the sixth technological order was carried out. The revealed disproportions and the negative factors that caused them make it possible to determine the conditions for effective realization of juvenile potential as a social resource for progressive development of the Russian economy in a strategic perspective.

Discussion and Conclusion. The scientific importance of the obtained results consists in the elaboration of the scientific concept of juvenile potential, its conceptual and categorical framework, as well as in the systematization of theoretical approaches to the development of performance indicators. The results can be used to substantiate promising directions of socio-economic, youth, and education policies, as well as those dealing with organization and monitoring of socio-economic development of the state and territories.

Keywords: economic development, neo-industrial productive forces, juvenile potential, social resource, innovative development of the economy

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

For citation: Ilyakova I.E., Lizina O.M., Sausheva O.S. Juvenile Potential as a Social Resource for Economic Development in a Changing Technological Order. Regionology = Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2020; 28(4):638-665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.113.028.202004.638-665

REFERENCES

1. Acemoğlu D. Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press; 2008. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Modern-Economic-Growth-Acemoglu/dp/0... (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Eng.)

2. Romer D. Advanced Macroeconomics. London: McGraw-Hill Education; 2011. Available at:

https://www.amazon.com/Advanced-Macroeconomics-McGraw-Hill-Economics-David/dp/0073511374 (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Eng.)

3. Azariadis C. Intertemporal Macroeconomics. Blackwell: Oxford; 1993. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Intertemporal-Macroeconomics-Costas-Azariadis/dp/1557863660 (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Eng.)

4. De la Croix D., Michelle P. A Theory of Economic Growth. Dynamics and Policy in Overlapping Generations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Theory-Economic-Growth-Overlapping-Generations/dp/0521001153 (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Eng.)

5. Agénor P. A Computable Overlapping Generations Model for Gender and Growth Policy Analysis. Macroeconomic Dynamics. 2017; 21(1):11-54. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S136510051500036X

6. Burkhard H. The Overlapping Generations Model. In: Public Economics. The Macroeconomic Perspective. Springer, Cham; 2019. p. 63-98. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00989-2_3

7. Shestakova N.N., Skvortsova M.B. The Human Capital of the Young Generation as the Innovative Potential of the Society. Trudy karelskogo nauchnogo tsentra RАN = Transactions of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2013; (5):129-139. Available at: http://resources.krc.karelia.ru/transactions/doc/trudy2013/trudy_2013_5_129-139.pdf (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

8. Ilyinsky I.M. Youth as the Future of Russia in Categories of War. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. 2005; (3):5-17. Available at: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/zpu/2005_3/Ilinskiy/1.pdf (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Russ.)

9. Ryazanov V.T. Time for a New Industrialization: The Prospects of Russia. Ehkonomist = The Economist. 2013; (8):3-33. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21467406 (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Russ.)

10. Maslova I. Social Potential of Economic Development. Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk = Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2008; (2):37-53. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialnyy-potentsial-razvitiya-ekonomiki (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Russ.)

11. Kosintseva T.D., Khairullina N.G., Gluhih I.N., Pryakhina E.N., Nikiforov A.Y., Bogdanova J.Z. The Life of Young Russia: Value Orientations and Life Paths. Espacios. 2017; 38(56). Available at: https://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n56/a17v38n56p25.pdf (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Russ.)

12. Martynova S.E., Dmitriev Y.G., Gajfullina M.M., Totskaya Y.A. “Service” Municipal Administration as Part of the Development of Youth Entrepreneurship in Russia. Social Indicators Research. 2017; 133(3):1151-1164. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1406-2

13. Chikaeva K.S., Scherbakova L.I., Karapetyan E.A., Latysheva A.T., Kosinov S.S., Zinchenko Ya.G., et al. Social Health of Russian Youth: The Specificity of Social and Managerial Technologies of Formation. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management and Applied Sciences and Technologies. 2018; 9(6):515-525. Available at: https://tuengr.com/V09/515M.pdf (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Eng.)

14. Gaisina L.M., Shaikhislamov R.B., Shayakhmetova R.R., Kostyleva E.G., Goremykina L.I., Gainanova A.G. The Essence and Structural Elements of a Healthy Lifestyle of Students. Espacios. 2019; 40(21). Available at: http://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n21/19402110.html (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Eng.)

15. Matsumoto A., Szidarovszky F. Delay Growth Model Augmented with Physical and Human Capitals. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 2020; 130. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109452

16. Wang W., Chen W. Stochastic Delay Differential Neoclassical Growth Model. Advances in Difference Equations. 2019; Article 355. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2292-0

17. Ilyakova I.E. Reproduction of Intellectual Capital of the National Economy in the Conditions of Formation of a New Technological Way. Vestnik Evrazijskoj nauki = The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2019; (5). Available at: https://esj.today/PDF/68ECVN519.pdf (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

18. Ustenko V.S. Changes in Approaches to the Formation of the Educational Structure of Human Potential in the Period of Changing Technological Orders. Gorizonty ehkonomiki = Horizons of Economics. 2015; (6):79-84. (In Russ.)

19. Tambovtsev V.L. Innovations and Culture: Importance of the Analysis Methodology. Voprosy ehkonomiki = Issues of Economics. 2018; (9):70-94. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-9-70-94

20. Rusyak I.G., Ketova K.V. Assessment and Modeling of the Dynamics of Human Capital. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii = Modern High Technologies. 2007; (9):56-58. Available at: https://top-technologies.ru/en/article/view?id=25480 (accessed 03.05.2020). (In Russ.)

Submitted 05.08.2020; accepted for publication 24.09.2020; published online 30.12.2020.

About the authors:

Irina E. Ilyakova, Associate Professor, Department of Theoretical Economics and Economic Security, National Research Mordovia State University (68/1 Bolshevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), Ph. D. (Economics), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9975-642X, sygirina1@yandex.ru

Olga M. Lizina, Associate Professor, Department of Theoretical Economics and Economic Security, National Research Mordovia State University (68/1 Bolshevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), Ph. D. (Economics), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7965-4151, lizinaom@yandex.ru

Oksana S. Sausheva, Associate Professor, Department of Theoretical Economics and Economic Security, National Research Mordovia State University (68/1 Bolshevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), Ph. D. (Economics), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2901-9584, savox@mail.ru

Contribution of the authors:

Irina E. Ilyakova – statement of the research problem; formulation of the basic concept of the study; evaluation of the results; drawing conclusions.

Olga M. Lizina – choice of research methodology; data structuring and analysis.

Oksana S. Sausheva – critical analysis and revision of the text.

The authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

To download article