G. S. Denisova. Sociological Evaluation of the Influence of International Migration on the Socio-Economic Development of the Rostov Region

UDК 314.74(470.61)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.114.029.202101.126-150

Introduction. In Russia, migration is currently considered to be an important resource for replenishing the population, although the population growth resulting from migration is quite slow. Russia’s Concept of the State Migration Policy until 2025 has been revised in order to improve the situation and ensure the inflow of foreign labor migrants. The goal of this article, based on the results of the conducted study, is to reveal the attitude of the population of the host community (Rostov Region) towards an increase in the flow of foreign labor migrants in the current socio-economic circumstances, as well as the expert evaluation of the effectiveness of handling the migration situation at the regional level.

Materials and Methods. The object of study conducted was the migration situation in the Rostov Region, which is one of the leaders in the socio-economic development of the macroregion and the border area of ​​the South of Russia. A survey was conducted among the general public (n = 300) using the method of standardized interviews, among university students (n = 200), using the method of questionnaire, and among experts (n = 30) using the method of semi-structured interviews. The constructivist approach was adopted as the conceptual foundation of the analysis performed. This enabled the author to use various methods of surveying the population, including university students and the expert community.

Results. The performed analysis of the collected empirical material has revealed that most people in the region use the results of migrant labour in various sectors of the economy without treating migrants as competitors in the regional labor market and do not feel any noticeable influence of migrants on their lives. Experts are more critical of the prospects of integrating migrants, perceiving the growth of their number as a threat to the cultural identity of the host community.

Discussion and Conclusion. Dynamic development of a region requires proactive migration policies, largely based on the loyalty of the population, including young people, to foreign migrants and their positive attitude towards integration. The analysis of the collected material has been targeted at the regional authorities implementing migration policies. The research results may prove useful to civil society institutions promoting interaction between migrants and the host community.

Keywords: migration, host community, stereotype, loyalty, integration, attitude, migration policy

Funding. The study was carried out as part of the project “Monitoring Ethnic and Confessional Situation Using the Model of the Distributed Scientific Centre for International and Religious Problems on the Verge of all-Russian Census in the Areas of the Southern Federal District” (2019). Registry number: 748715Ф.99.1.ББ97АА00002.

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

For citation: Denisova G.S. Sociological Evaluation of the Influence of International Migration on the Socio-Economic Development of the Rostov Region. Regionology = Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2021; 29(1):126-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.114.029.202101.126-150

REFERENCES

1. Ryazantsev S.V. Modern Migration Policy of Russia: Challenges and Approaches to Improvement. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. 2019; (9):117-126. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250006666-5

2. Fofanova K.F., Sychev A.A. Factors in Migration Attractiveness of a Provincial City: The Case Study of the City of Saransk. Regionology = Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2019; 27(4):756-778. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.109.027.201904.756-778

3. Haas H., Castles S., Miller M.J. The Age of Migration. 6th edition. London: Red Globe Press; 2020. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Age-Migration-Stephen-Castles/dp/0230517846 (accessed 22.12.2020). (In Eng.)

4. Adugna G. Migration Patterns and Emigrants’ Transnational Activities: Comparative Findings from Two Migrant Origin Areas in Ethiopia. Comparative Migration Studies. 2019; 7, article 5. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0107-1

5. Logan J.R., Wenquan Z., Alba R.D. Immigrant Enclaves and Ethnic Communities in New York and Los Angeles. American Sociological Review. 2002; 67(2):299-322. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3088897

6. Flippen C.A., Parrado E.A. Forging Hispanic Communities in New Destinations: A Case Study of Durham, North Carolina. City & Community. 2012; 11(1):1-30. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2011.01369.x

7. Bauböck R., Brettell C., Crul M., Martiniello M., Mukomel V., Reeves M., Tkach O., van Tubergen F. Forum. Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = Urban Studies and Practices. 2017; 2(1):11-24. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/usp21201711-24

8. Kavita P., Holloway S.R. New Immigrant Geographies of United States Metropolitan Areas. Geographical Review. 2005; 95(2). (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2005.tb00360.x

9. Heikkila E.J. From Urban Enclave to Ethnic Suburb. New Asian Communities in Pacific Rim Countries. Journal of Regional Science. 2008; 48(2):481-483. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00559_12.x

10. Krase J. Seeing Cities Change: Local Culture and Class. Seeing Cities Change: Local Culture and Class. Farnham: Ashgate; 2012. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277774609_Seeing_Cities_Change_Local_Culture_and_Class (accessed 02.01.2021). (In Eng.)

11. Ozgen C., Nijkamp P., Poot J. Immigration and Innovation in European Regions. IZA Discussion Paper, no. 5676. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Bonn; 2011. Available at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp5676.pdf (accessed 03.01.2021). (In Eng.)

12. Schröder Ph., Stephan-Emmrich M. The Institutionalization of Mobility: Well-being and Social Hierarchies in Central Asian Translocal Livelihoods. Mobilities. 2014; 11(3):1-24. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.984939

13. Waisman G., Larsen, B. Income, Amenities and Negative Attitudes. IZA Journal of Migration. 2016; 5(8):1-32. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40176-016-0056-0

14. Grishin I. Sweden’s Immigration Worries Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2017; 61(9):66-76. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-9-66-76

15. Degler E., Liebig T. Labour Market Integration of Refugees in Germany. 2017. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/els/mig/Finding-their-Way-Germany.pdf (accessed 03.01.2021). (In Eng.)

16. Oberhof M. “Refugees Welcome!”: The Story of Successful Integration: This is how you can help Refugees. Goldmann Verlag; 2016. Available at: https://www.politische-bildung-brandenburg.de/veranstaltungen/refugees-w... (accessed 30.10.2020). (In German)

17. Lochner S. Integration Courses as an Engine for Social Cohesion? Inter-ethnic Contacts, and National Solidarity of Migrants in Germany. Budrich UniPress Ltd.; 2015. Available at: https://www.amazon.de/Integrationskurse-Motor-gesellschaftlichen-Zusamme... (accessed 03.01.2021). (In German)

18. Simpson J.J., Simpson P.M., Cruz-Milan O. Attitude towards Immigrants and Security: Effects on Destination-loyal Tourists. Tourism Management. 2016; 57:373-386. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.021

19. Shaparov A. Formation of a New Immigration Regime in Europe. Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2017; 61(7):83-92. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-7-83-92

20. Ryazantsev V.S. Foreign Migration Policy of Russia. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy = International Trends. 2016; 14(4):22-29. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2016.14.4.47.2

21. Zorin​ V.Yu. The Migration Situation in the Russian Federation: Problems and Solutions. Gumanitarnie nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2019; (9):40-50. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-3-40-50

22. Gudkov L. Why Do We Dislike the Non-Residents? Mir Rossii = Universe of Russia. 2007; 16(2):48-82. Available at: https://mirros.hse.ru/index.php/mirros/article/view/5178 (accessed 15.10.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

23. Abashin S.N. Central Asian Migration: Practices, Local Communities, Transnationalism. Ehtnograficheskoe obozrenie = Ethnographic Review. 2012; (4):3-13. Available at: https://journal.iea.ras.ru/archive/2010s/2012/4.htm (accessed 02.10.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

24. Mukomel V.I. Integration of Migrants: Challenges, Policies, Social Practices. Mir Rossii = Universe of Russia. 2011; 20(1):34-50. Available at: https://mirros.hse.ru/article/view/5066/5416 (accessed 12.10.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

25. Popkov Yu.V., Popkova T.V. The Impact of Migration on Ethnosocial Processes: The Case of Siberia. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. 2016; (1):86-92. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2016.1.6

26. Varshaver E.A., Rocheva A.L., Ivanova N.S. Integration of the Second Generation Migrants Aged 18–30 in Moscow: First Results of the Research Project. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ehkonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2017; (6):63-81. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2017.6.04

27. Britvina I.B., Mogilchak E.L. The Typology of Citizens of a Russian Megapolis According to their Attitudes to Migrants of Different Ethnicities. Mir Rossii = Universe of Russia. 2018; (1):114-134. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2018-27-1-114-134

Submitted 05.11.2020; approved after reviewing 30.11.2020; accepted for publication 09.12.2020.

About the author:

Galina S. Denisova, Professor, Department of Russian History of the 20th–21st Centuries, Southern Federal University (105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya St., Rostov-on-Don 344006, Russian Federation), Dr. Sci. (Sociology), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6780-0112, gsdenisova@sfedu.ru

The author has read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
To download article