G. S. Denisova. The Attitude of Student Youth in the South of Russia to the 2021 Population Census

UDК 351.755.361(470.345)

DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.121.030.202204.882-902

Abstract

Introduction. A census is a necessary tool of managing a modern state. IT penetration into all spheres of life caused digitalization of census, the procedure which rests on consciousness and is voluntary in its nature. Transition to these technologies is related to a number of difficulties influencing the quality of census. The goal of the article is to identify the attitude of the south Russian students’ youth to participation in census, its optimal forms and the aspects causing major concerns among this target group.

Materials and Methods. Students’ behavioral attitudes towards the census and participation in it, have become the subject of research. The research consisted of two stages: right before the census (2019) and right after it (2021). Using the method of standardized survey, the author has identified the attitudes and behavioral patterns of students from leading universities of Astrakhan and Rostov regions and the Republic of Kalmykia (n = 200 on 2019; n = 300 on 2021 in each subject). Constructivist approach considering different types of identities, referred to during the census as social constructs, has become the conceptual basis of the research.

Results. The analysis of the empirical data gathered demonstrates a low level of student engagement in census accompanied by the majority of the target group lacking the comprehension of its sense. At the same time, the survey results point to the rise of civil identity paired with the stable interest to ethnocultural identity, high loyalty level to bilingualism and multiple cultural identity. Students have shared their concern about the quality of the census procedure.

Discussion and Conclusion. The first experience of digitalizing the census procedure points to the necessity of using the youth appealing digital technology for appropriate presentation of this large-scale event and promoting it among the young audience. Lack of attention to this side of census defines the youth’s reluctant attitude to participating in it and may become the foundation for further distorting of its results. The obtained findings are useful to researchers when analyzing the results of the 2021 population census, as well as to specialists engaged in the development of the program and tools for the population census.

Keywords: census, students, civil identity, ethnocultural identity, national (native) language, digital technology, idea of census, bilingualism

Funding. The research was completed within the project “Monitoring of ethnocultural relations and religious situation using the model of the distributed scientific centre in Russian regions” № 075-03-2021-407/3.

For citation: Denisova G. S. The Attitude of Student Youth in the South of Russia to the 2021 Population Census. Regionology. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2022;30(4):882–902. doi: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.121.030.202204.882-902

REFERENCES

1. Brown J., Beaujouan E. Review of the Rolling Census Approach: And other Survey-Based Options. Working Paper Number 32. ESRC Centre for Population Change, 2013. Available at: https://www.cpc.ac.uk/docs/2013_WP32_Review_of_the_rolling_census_approach_Brown_et_al.pdf (accessed 10.08.2022).

2. Dolenc D. Novelties of the 2002 Census in Slovenia: The Use of the Combined Method and Outsourcing of Census Operations. Statistical Journal of the IAOS. 2007;24:111–119. Available at: https://ip.ios.semcs.net/articles/statistical-journal-of-the-iaos/sji00677 (accessed 10.08.2022).

3. Durr J.-M., Dumais J. Redesign of the French Census of Population. Survey Methodology. 2002;28(1). Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/11-522-x/2001001/session11/6264-eng.pdf?st=W0dBf6I8 (accessed 10.08.2022).

4. Valente P. [Carrying out censuses in Europe: according to the population in the 2010 round]. Voprosy statistiki. 2012;(12):3–8. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18207515 (accessed 10.08.2022). (In Russ.)

5. Kachanova N.N. [All-Russian Сensus 2010. Methodological Foundation]. Akademiya byudzheta i kaznacheistva Minfina Rossii. Finansovyi zhurnal. 2010;(4):95–106. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_15213402_77513406.pdf (accessed 10.08.2022). (In Russ.)

6. Zbarskaya I.A. [On Getting Prepared to All-Russian Census 2010]. Voprosy statistiki. 2010;(2):3–7. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15125795 (accessed 10.08.2022). (In Russ.)

7. Eliseeva I.I., Dekina M.P. Upcoming Population Census: All-Russian Innovative RPC-2020. Innovations. 2019;(10):26‒31. Available at: https://maginnov.ru/ru/zhurnal/arhiv/2019/innovacii-n-10-2019/priblizhaetsya-perepis-naseleniya-vserossijskaya-innovacionnaya-vpn-2020 (accessed 10.08.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

8. Klupt M.A., Nikiforov O.N. Russian Population Censuses in the Age of Digital Economy. Voprosy statistiki. 2018;25(5):3–10. Available at: https://voprstat.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/678 (accessed 10.08.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

9. Klupt M.A., Nikiforov O.N. [Alternative Census Methods: Are they Applicable in Russia?]. Voprosy statistiki. 2010;(9):3–8. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15180860 (accessed 10.08.2022). (In Russ.)

10. Vishnevskiy A.G., Zakharov S.V. [What is and what is not Russian Demographic Statistics Aware of]. Voprosy statistiki. 2010;(2):7–17. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15125796 (accessed 10.08.2022). (In Russ.)

11. Vorontsov V.S. Population Censuses as a Source of Ethnic and Linguistic Characteristics of the Population. Historical and Cultural Heritage of the Ural-Volga Region Peoples. 2020;(2):93–97. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15350/26191490.2020.2.9

12. Lange A. The Population and Housing Census in a Register Based Statistical System. Statistical Journal of the IAOS. 2014;30(1):41–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-140798

13. MacDonald A.L. Of Science and Statistics: The Scientific Basis of the Census. Statistical Journal of the IAOS. 2020;36(1):17–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-190596

14. Schulte Nordholt E. The Usability of Administrative Data for Register-Based Censuses. Statistical Journal of the IAOS. 2018;34(4):487–498. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-180425

15. MacDonald A.L. The Population Census: Counting People because They Count. In: Macfarlane S.B., Abou Zahr C., editors. The Palgrave Handbook of Global Health Data Methods for Policy and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019. p. 105–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54984-6_6

16. Stepanov V.V., Tishkov V.A. Russia in its Ethnic Dimensions (2002 Census Results). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2005;(9):64–73. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17311729 (accessed 10.08.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

17. Krasnopol’skaya I., Solodova G. National Census as an Instrument of Nation Building in the Postindustrial Age. Universe of Russia. 2016;25(1):55–78. Available at: https://mirros.hse.ru/article/view/4911 (accessed 10.08.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

18. Tishkov V.A. [Lessons of Census]. Byulleten’ Seti etnologicheskogo monitoringa i rannego preduprezhdeniya konfliktov. 2002;(45). Available at: http://www.valerytishkov.ru/cntnt/publikacii3/publikacii/uroki_pere.html (accessed 10.08.2022). (In Russ.)

19. Tishkov V.A. Language Situation and Language Policy in Russia (Revising Categories and Practices). Polis. Political Studies. 2019;(3):127–144. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.03.08

20. Drobizheva L.M., Ryzhova S.V. All-Russian Identity in the Sociological Dimension. Bulletin of Russian Nation. 2021;(1-2):39–52. Available at: http://rosnation.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ВРН-2021-№-1.pdf (accessed 10.08.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

21. Namrueva L.V. Do the Students of Kalmykia need Kalmyk Language (According to Sociological Surveys of 2015 and 2017). The New Research of Tuva. 2018;(1):143–151. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2018.1.12

Submitted 16.03.2022; approved after reviewing 11.05.2022; accepted for publication 16.05.2022.

About the author:

Galina S. Denisova, Professor, Department of Russian History of the 20th–21st Centuries, Southern Federal University (105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya St., Rostov-on-Don 344006, Russian Federation), Dr. Sci. (Sociology), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6780-0112, gsdenisova@sfedu.ru

The author has read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

To download article