V. G. Nemirovskiy. The Problem of the Socio-Cultural Integration of Regions through the Prism of the Concept of the Estate Class Structure of Russian Society

UDК 316.32

doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.124.031.202303.548-563

Abstract

Introduction. The motivation for this research is the social contradiction between the need of the modern Russian state for effective socio-cultural integration of various regions of the country, on the one hand, and yet insufficient consideration of the peculiarities of their estate social structure in this process. The purpose of the article is to consider the estate class structure of the regions of Russia as one of the factors of their socio-cultural integration.

Materials and Methods. The object of the study is the socio-cultural integration of Russian regions. The subject is the role of the estate class structure of regions in the process of their socio-cultural integration. A number of general scientific methods are used in this study: analysis, synthesis, induction, formalization, idealization, hypothetical-deductive method, analysis of scientific literature, secondary analysis of empirical studies, analysis of state statistics. As the main was used estate structure approach and variants of the socio-cultural approach. Structural and functional concepts were also used.

Results. It was found that the elements of estate class structure such as titular or non-titular estates are not equally represented in different regions of the country. The definition of the concept of socio-cultural integration of regions is introduced. The role of the estate class structure of the regions in the process of their socio-cultural integration is determined. It is concluded that the combination of estate and stratification (class) structures of society, due to the inevitable contradictions between them, can lead to the emergence of institutional, value and other social conflicts that act as an obstacle to effective socio-cultural integration of regions. This may lead to the socio-cultural fragmentation and disintegration of regions.

Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the study can be used to enhance the effectiveness of the socio-cultural integration of Russian regions, as well as to improve regional social policy. Further analysis of this problem involves the conducting of comparative studies based a special technique that makes it possible to identify people’s belonging to certain estates, social classes and strata.

Keywords: socio-cultural integration, socio-cultural integration of the regions, sociology of the regions, social structure, estate social structure, socio-cultural approach

Conflict of interests. The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

For citation: Nemirovskiy V.G. The Problem of the Socio-Cultural Integration of Regions through the Prism of the Concept of the Estate Class Structure of Russian Society. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2023;31(3):548–563. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.124.031.202303.548-563

REFERENCES

1. Lapin N.I. Status of Regions in Russia, the Unbalance of Their Socio-Cultural Functions. Universe of Russia. 2006;15(2):3–41. Available at: https://mirros.hse.ru/article/view/5205 (accessed 15.01.2023) (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. Terzakis K., Daskalopoulou I. Socio-Cultural Integration of First Generation Immigrants in Greece. Migration Letters. 2021;18(6):649–658. Available at: https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/948 (accessed 15.01.2023).

3. Fischer C. Manifestations and Contestations of Borders and Boundaries in Everyday Understandings of Integration. Migration Letters. 2020;17(4):531–540. Available at: https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/836 (accessed 15.01.2023).

4. Giovanis E. Impact of Migration Policies on Socio-Cultural Participation and Well-Being: Evidence from the Migration Act of 2000 in Germany. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-01-2022-0014

5. Nakhaie R. Language Proficiency and Sociocultural Integration of Canadian Newcomers. Applied Psycholinguistics. 2020;41(6):1437–1464. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000375

6. Gherghina S., Plopeanu A.-P., Necula C.-V. The Impact of Socio-Cultural Integration on Return Intentions: Evidence from a Survey on Romanian Migrants. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies. 2020;18(4):515–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2020.1735599

7. Pavez-Soto I. Sociocultural Integration and Rights of Immigrant Children in the Local Context. The Case of the Recoleta District (Metropolitan Region, Chile). Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena. 2017;49(4):613–622. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320610394_Sociocultural_integration_and_rights_of_immigrant_children_in_the_local_context_The_case_of_the_Recoleta_district_Metropolitan_Region_Chile (accessed 15.01.2023). (In Spanish)

8. Ahmed S.P., Ahmed S.U., Hasan I. Transformation of Sociocultural Integration Policy and Inherent Political Theories in the United Kingdom: A Way Forward. SAGE Open. 2021;11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211007461

9. Diduc (Sniazhko) S. Integration Team Members’ Approaches to Uncertainty Management in M&A. European Management Journal. 2022;40(6):917–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.10.002

10. Liang J., Shi Y., Osman M., Shrestha B., Wang P. The Association between Social Integration and Utilization of Essential Public Health Services Among Internal Migrants in China: A Multilevel Logistic Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(18):6524. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186524

11. Popov M.E. Socio-Cultural Integration as a Tool for Ethnic Conflicts Resolution in the North Caucasus. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations. 2018;23(4):186–196. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2018.4.16

12. Maximova S.G., Omelchenko D.A., Noyanzina O.E. The Trust of Migrants Towards Recipient Society in the Context of Social Security in the Russian Border Regions of Russia. Siberian Socium. 2019;3(2):18–34. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.21684/2587-8484-2019-3-2-18-34

13. Derlugyan G. [Crises of Neo-Patrimonial Government]. Logos. 2006;(5):154–160. Available at: https://ruthenia.ru/logos/number/56/5_2006_Logos.pdf (accessed 15.01.2023). (In Russ.)

14. Kordonsky S.G., Dehant D.K., Molyarenko O.A. The Estate Components of Russia’s Contemporary Social Structure: A Hypothetico-Deductive Analysis and Modeling Attempt. Universe of Russia. 2012;21(2):62–102. Available at: https://mirros.hse.ru/article/view/5027/5383 (accessed 15.01.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

15. Vakhitov R.R. Estates and Razdatok (Clarifying the Definition of Estates). Sociological Journal. 2017;23(4):121–138. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2017.23.4.5532

16. Startsev Yu. Neo-Feodalism or Neopatrimonialism? Quantitative Analysis of the “New Middle Ages” Conceptualizations in Political Science. Vox medii aevi. 2019;2:127–149. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2587-6619-2019-00017

17. Martianov V.S. In Search of Another Mainstream. Polis. Political Studies. 2021;(4):112 –131. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.04.09

18. Toshchenko Zh.T. Evolution of Ideas of the Social Structure of Russian Society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2022;(10):62–73. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250021404-7

19. Temnitskiy A.L. The Sociocultural in Complex Society: From Single Notion to Dual Oppositions. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2011;(4):180–188. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2011-4-19-180-188

20. Konstantinova L.V. Integration Potential of Society: A Conceptualization. Sociological Studies. 2019;(8):19–29. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250006133-9

21. Nemirovskiy V.G. Justice Concept in the Context of the Estate Social Structure of Contemporary Russian Society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017;(9):40–47. Available at: https://www.isras.ru/index.php?page_id=2624&jn=socis&jn=socis&jid=6849 (accessed 15.01.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

22. Nemirovsky V.G. Value and Social Class Obstacles on the Way Towards Socio-Cultural Modernization of Russia and its Regions. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2013;(4):57–70. Available at: https://monitoringjournal.ru/index.php/monitoring/article/view/1530/1298 (accessed 15.01.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

23. Kordonsky S.G., Chernov M.I., Molyarenko O.A., Plusnin Ju. Ethno-Social Potential of the Territory: a Special Case of the Jewish Autonomous Region. Ideas and Ideals. 2018;10(4-1):105–135. Available at: https://ideaidealy.nsuem.ru/articles/etnosocialniy-potencial-territorii-osobiy-sluchay-evreyskoy-avtonomnoy-oblasti (accessed 15.01.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

24. Puzankov I.A. A Cossack’s Whole Life is War, there is no Fear in a Cossack’s Heart!” or How They Become Cossacks Today. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. 2022;14(4):41–61. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2022.14.4.3

25. Lapin N.I. [Socio-Cultural Factors of Russian Stagnation and Modernization]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2011;(9):3–18. Available at: https://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/2011-9/Lapin.pdf (accessed 15.01.2023). (In Russ.)

Submitted 01.02.2023; revised 14.03.2023; accepted 23.03.2023.

About the author:

Valentin G. Nemirovskiy, Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Full Professor, Leading Researcher, Department of Sociology and Social Psychology, Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences (51/21 Nakhimovsky Av., 117418 Moscow, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4076-465X, valnemirov@mail.ru

The author has read and approved the final version of the manuscript.