Yu. S. Markova, S. S. Gordeeva. Models of Interaction of Social Subjects and Actors in Ensuring Socio-Cultural Security of Municipalities

https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.129.033.202503.531-548
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/zntncxISSN 2413-1407
УДК / UDC 008-027.45 

Abstract

Introduction. In the realities of modern Russian society, characterized by increasing social differentiation and the risk of increased intergroup tension, there is an acute shortage of effective mechanisms for maintaining public consensus and integration at the municipal level. This is why studying the models of interaction between local governments and civil society structures in the process of social design becomes particularly relevant, as it represents a potential tool for reducing the risks of social disintegration.

Materials and Methods. The methodology of the empirical study is based on a case study strategy. Six municipal districts of the Perm Territory were used as case studies. The materials were based on the results of an expert survey of representatives of municipal authorities, heads of socially oriented non-profit organizations, as well as youth and volunteer associations in the selected municipalities (a total of 32 interviews were conducted between October and December 2024). The expert survey was conducted using the classic method of qualitative in-depth interviews. The analysis of the data obtained was based on the method of analytical induction. This method made it possible to identify and characterize models of interaction between subjects.

Results. A typology of models of interaction between various social actors in sociocultural projects was developed, identifying three distinct models: from limited mobilization at the grassroots level to institutionalized cross-sectoral partnerships. The important role of public organizations and socially responsible enterprises as catalysts for grassroots activities was identified, as well as the importance of systematic dialogue and the involvement of local opinion leaders in strengthening trust, increasing the legitimacy of projects, and ensuring social cohesion in territorial communities.

Discussion and Conclusion. The effectiveness of interaction between various social actors involved in sociocultural projects largely depends on the socioeconomic potential of the territory itself, the availability of financial resources, information and communication technologies, and the activity of the local population. Public organizations and socially responsible enterprises play an important role in activating local communities and establishing effective interaction with government agencies. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of applying its results to the development and support of socio-cultural projects and the activation of local residents, which will ultimately contribute to strengthening socio-cultural security in the territories.

Keywords: sociocultural security, social engineering, civil society, participatory approach, municipal entities

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The research was conducted with the support of a grant from the Russian Science Foundation No. 24-78-10117 (https://rscf.ru/project/24-78-10117/).

For citation: Markova Yu.S., Gordeeva S.S. Models of Interaction of Social Subjects and Actors in Ensuring Socio-Cultural Security of Municipalities. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2025;33(3):531–548. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.129.033.202503.531-548

REFERENCES

1. Podolskaya E.A., Nazarkina V.N. Social Security: Essence, Threats and Ways of Ensuring. Socio­logical Studies. 2016;(11):133–139. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://www.socis.isras.ru/files/File/2016/2016_11/Podolskaya.pdf (accessed 10.02.2025).

2. Antonova N.S., Badaraev D.D., Badonov A.M. Discussion of Issues of Social Security and Social Protection of the Population in Modern Conditions. Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2021;12(1):188–194. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2021.12.1.705

3. Iliycheva L.E., Parshina E.V., Lapin A.V., Ilyicheva M.V. Interaction between the State and Civil Society: Assessment of the Effectiveness of Social Partnership Policy. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2024;(4):315–332. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.4.2601

4. Zubok Y.A. Changing Social Reality: A Reflection on Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of Socio­logical Research on Youth. Research Result. Sociology and Management. 2022;8(3):10–30. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2022-8-3-0-2

5. Agamagomedova S., Gamidullaeva L. Trust Creation as a Factor for the Solidarity of Government, Business, and Society in Regional Innovation Development. International Journal of Innovation Studies. 2025;9(1):60–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.10.002

6. Frolova E.V., Rogach O.V. Trust as a Factor of the Development of Cooperation in Russia. Monito­ring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2023;(6):35–57. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.6.2405

7. Belyaeva L.A., Rakova K.V. Russian Society in 1990–2023: An Empirical Assessment of Social Structure, Life Quality, and Socio-Psychological Climate. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2025;(1):29–56. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2025.1.2658

8. Yakimets V.N., Nikovskaya L.I. Mechanisms and Principles of Intersectoral Social Partnership as a Basis for Developing the Public-State Governance. Vlast'. 2018;26(4):15–25. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://clck.ru/3NEqxB (accessed 10.02.2025).

9. Zhelnina A.A., Tykanova E.V. Formal and Informal Civic Infrastructure: Contemporary Stu­dies of Urban Local Activism in Russia. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2019;22(1):162–192. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2019.22.1.8

10. Plotnikova M.A. Formation of New Social-Group Communities on the Territory of the Municipa­lity with Low Initiative Citizens in Conditions of Conduction of SMO. Science. Culture. Society. 2023;29(2):18–27. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.19181/nko.2023.29.2.2

11. Crossley N. A Dependent Structure of Interdependence: Structure and Agency in Relational Perspective. Sociology. 2022;56(1):166–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385211020231

12. Crotty J., Ljubownikow S. Adapting to Survive or Thrive? Civil Society, the Third Sector and Social Movements in ‘Post-Soviet’ Spaces: An Introduction to the Themed Section. Voluntary Sector Review. 2024;15(1):3–11. Available at: https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/vsr/15/1/vsr.15.issue-1.xml (accessed 10.02.2025).

13. Jungsberg L., Copus A., Herslund L.B. et al. Key Actors in Community-Driven Social Innovation in Rural Areas in the Nordic Countries. Journal of Rural Studies. 2020;(79):276–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.004

14. Mukhametov R. Why Do Citizens Trust the Government? The Origins of Political Trust in Modern Russia. Sociological Review. 2023;22(3):196–218. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2023-3-196-218

15. Skokova Yu., Rybnikova M. The Size of Nonprofit Sector in Russian Regions: Differentiating Factors. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2022;25(1):70–102. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2022.25.1.3

16. Sokolov A.V., Frolov A.A. Practices of Grassroots Civic Activity in the Yaroslavl Region: Problems and Results of Implementation. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2024;32(3):463–483. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.128.032.202403.463-483

17. Makarenko K.M. Vectors of Transformation of Civil Activity of Russian Youth in the First Third of the 21st Century. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations. 2024;29(5):187–198. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.5.16

18. Karavai A.V. The Social Capital of Russian Society: A Year under a Special Military Operation. Terra Economicus. 2023;21(4):91–105. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-4-91-105

19. Pantin V.I. Russian Society at the Beginning of the 20th and 21st Centuries: Problems and Risks. Sociological Studies. 2019;(11):120–130. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250007456-4

20. Mikidenko N., Storozheva S. Trust as a Resource for Developing Charitable Participation. The Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2024;22(3):433–448. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2024-22-3-433-448

21. Gorshkov M.K., Tyurina I.O. Consolidation of the Russian Society under Contemporary Challenges: Social-Historical and Value Contexts. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2023;23(4):720–739. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2023-23-4-720-739

22. Botchway T.P. Understanding the Dynamics and Operations of Civil Society in the 21st Century: A Literature Review. Journal of Politics and Law. 2019;12(1):108–121. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v12n1p108

23. Rakova K.V. Levels and Components of the Social Identity of the Contemporary Russian Society. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2024;24(2):510–522. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/39940 (accessed 10.02.2025).

24. Wu H. Redefining Concepts of Nation and National Security and Establishing their Models for the New Era. Journal of Safety and Sustainability. 2025;2(1):45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsasus.2024.12.002

25. Bidwell D., Schweizer P.-J. Public Values and Goals for Public Participation. Environmental Policy and Governance. 2021;31(4):257–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1913

26. Grunow D., Sachweh P., Schimank U., Traunmüller R. Social Integration: Conceptual Foundations and Open Questions. An Introduction to this Special Issue. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 2023;(75):1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-023-00896-1

About the authors:

Yuliia S. Markova, Cand.Sci. (Sociol.), Associate Professor of the Chair of Sociology of Perm State University (15 Bukireva St., Perm 614068, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6271-9403, Researcher ID: ABG-6689-2021, SPIN-code: 9951-6137, julyamarkova@gmail.com

Svetlana S. Gordeeva, Cand.Sci. (Sociol.), Associate Professor of the Chair of Sociology of Perm State University (15 Bukireva St., Perm 614068, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-8318, Researcher ID: AAJ-6327-2021, Scopus ID: 57208303487, SPIN-code: 2145-2519, SSGordeyeva@mail.ru

Contribution of the authors: Yu. S. Markova – formulating the research concept/idea, goals, and objectives; creating and preparing the manuscript: visualizing the research results and data obtained; obtaining financial support for the research project, which resulted in this publication; supervising, leading, and mentoring the research planning and implementation process.

S. S. Gordeeva – writing the manuscript: visualization of research results and data obtained.

Availability of data and materials. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

The authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 15.03.2025; revised 15.05.2025; accepted 27.05.2025.