E. A. Avdeev, S. N. Bredikhin, S. M. Vorobiev. The Socio-Political Image of Modern Russia in the Perceptions of Student Youth in the North Caucasus

https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.129.033.202503.549-565
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/rghvocI
УДК / UDC 17.022.1:323-053.81 (470.62/.67) (470+571)

Abstract

Introduction. The significance of values inherent in the socio-political image of modern Russia is becoming increasingly relevant in light of the need for nationwide consolidation against the backdrop of growing hybrid threats and heightened international tensions. The consciousness of the younger generation reflects both general cultural trends characteristic of youth and the regional specifics of the North Caucasus. The purpose of this article is to identify generational commonalities and ethnocultural differences in the perception of the socio-political image of Russia by student youth in the North Caucasus.

Materials and Methods. Socio-cultural and generational approaches served the theoretical and metho­dological basis. Empirical data were obtained through an online survey among students of North Caucasian universities (May-June 2024, n = 1,500, aged 18–24 years). The sample covered six North Caucasian regions: Stavropol, North Ossetia–Alania, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, Chechnya and Ingushetia. Representativeness by gender, nationality and religion was ensured by observing quotas. Respondents' assessments were measured on a 5-point scale. Data processing was carried out in SPSS. To determine the influence of the ethno-confessional factor, ANOVA and post-hoc analysis were used.

Results. The study revealed the prevalence of common perceptions and evaluative approaches to the image of Russia. According to most empirical indicators, no statistically significant differences were found in students' self-identification based on ethnic and religious affiliation. The similarity in perceptions of basic socio-political values and understanding of Russia's image among Orthodox Christians and Muslims can be explained by the common traditional foundations of Orthodox and Islamic identity among young people. Respondents' religious affiliation has a greater influence on their assessments than their nationality. The influence of religious self-identification on the choice of a particular model of the state and the nature of its relations with the individual and society was also revealed. The image of a state that ensures sovereignty, security, and the preservation of civilizational identity is of the greatest importance. At the same time, its attractiveness decreases among non-religious respondents.

Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the study allow us to conclude that there is a prevailing generational community in the assessments of student youth of a number of values and socio-political foundations that determine the vector of the country's socio-cultural development. Young people focus on Russia's value-based civilizational identity. Studying how young people in the North Caucasus see Russia's social and political image will help form “assembly points” for Russian identity in this multi-ethnic region. Its practical significance lies in the introduction of new empirical material into scientific circulation: the assessments and perceptions of North Caucasian youth about the models and images of the future Russia. The results will be useful to specialists in the field of social, humanitarian, and identity studies in multinational regions. Research into ways and models of implementing the socio-political foundations of Russia's image that are attractive to Generation Z can also be conducted in other multi-ethnic macro-regions of the country.

Keywords: youth, students, values, socio-political image of Russia, personality, society, state, North Caucasus, polyethnicity, polyconfessionality

Funding. The research was carried out within the framework of the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation “Patriotism as an Integrating Value of a Multi-Ethnic Russian Society” (FSRN-2023-0025).

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Avdeev E.A., Bredikhin S.N., Vorobiev S.M. The Socio-Political Image of Modern Russia in the Perceptions of Student Youth in the North Caucasus. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2025;33(3):549–565. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.129.033.202503.549-565

REFERENCES

1. Zinurova R.I. Formation of “Network Consciousness” of Generation Z in Virtual Space. Sustainable Development Management. 2021;(4):48–53. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46615445

2. Zinurova R.I., Nikitina T.N., Fatkhullina L.Z. Social Practices and Socio-Psychological Characteristics of Generation Z (Based on the Results of Focus Group Research). Tomsk State University Journal. 2022;(476):146–158. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/476/16

3. Andreeva A.S. Three Dimensions of Adulthood: Freedom, Responsibility, and Care. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2023;(7):105–116. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54611245

4. Jadova M.A. Generation of Millennials in Russian Society: In Search of Another Youth. Polis. Political Studies. 2020;(6):181–188. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.06.14

5. Zubok Y.A., Seliverstova N.A. Essential Components of the Image of the Future of the Country in the Representations of the Youth. Science. Culture. Society. 2022;28(4):56–74. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.19181/nko.2022.28.4.5

6. Zubok Y.A., Seliverstova N.A. Youth Views about the Future of the Country in the Projection of Culture. Science. Culture. Society. 2023;29(3):39–52. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.19181/nko.2023.29.3.1

7. Seliverstova N.A., Zubok Y.A. Religious Self-Identification of Youth: a Socio-Cultural Mechanism of Reproduction. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2023;26(2):135–174. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2023.26.2.7

8. Selezneva A.V., Tulegenova D.D. A Hundred Thousand “Me” in one “We”: Collective and Individual in the Russian Youth Worldview. RUDN Journal of Political Science. 2024;26(2):341–356. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=68477168

9. Evgenyeva T. V., Selezneva A. V., Skipin N. S., Tulegenova D. D. Request for Paternalism: The Concept and Value of State in the Minds of Russian Youth. RUDN Journal of Political Science. 2023;25(1):233–251. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-1-233-251

10. Kublitskaya E.A. The Main Values of the Consolidation of Russian Society in the Views of Religious and Non-Religious Student Youth. Research Result. Sociology and Management. 2023;9(2):21–42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2023-9-2-0-3

11. Levashov V.K., Grebnyak O.V., Novozhenina O.P. Images of the Future in the Consciousness of Russian Youth: Value Orientations, Digital Innovation and Socio-Political Expectations. Bulletin of the South-Russian State Technical University (NPI) Series Socio-Economic Sciences. 2021;14(2):104–120. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.17213/2075-2067-2021-2-104-120

12. Shaikhislamov R.B., Asadullina G.R., Sadretdinova E.V. The Image of Russia Present and Future in the Ideas of Youth: Semantic Hemes in the Context of New Challenges and Opportunities. Society and Security Insights. 2023;6(1):13–31. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). Available at: https://clck.ru/3NtSEk (accessed 06.05.2025).

13. Vilkov A.A. The Value-Ideological Factor in Shaping the Image of the Future of Russia among Modern Youth (Regional Case). Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology. 2022;22(1):101–107. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2022-22-1-101-107

14. Avksentiev V.A., Aksiumov B.V. “Identities Portfolio” of the Youth of the Southern Russia after 12 Years. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2022;(7):76–87. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250019645-2

15. Denisova G.S., Avdeev E.A., Vorobev S.M. Conflict-Generating Risks of the Ethnocultural Foundations of the Student Youth Identity: The Case of the Frontier North Caucasus Region. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2024;32(2):198–216. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.127.032.202402.198-216

16. Avdeev E.A., Vorob'ev S.M. Traditional Value Foundations of All-Russian Identity: Case Study of the Northern Caucasus Youth. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsialnaya praktika. 2023;11(3):37–54. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2023.11.3.2

17. Shahbanova M.M. Socio-Political Attitudes of the Young Generation of Dagestanis: Through the Prism of Islamic Doctrine (Based on the Results of the Sociological Survey). Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology. 2024;24(3):256–266. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2024-24-3-256-266

18. Zinurova R.I. Socio-Cultural Features of Generation Zet Civic Activism. Sustainable Development Manage­ment. 2022;(2):24–29. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.55421/2499992X_2022_2_24

19. Milekhin A.V., Sidorina A.V. Generational Classifier of Modern Russian Society. Vestnik universiteta. 2021;(1):156–163. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-1-156-163

20. Komarovsky V.S. Vision of the Future of the Country by Russian Youth: Hopes and Fears. Vlast'. 2021;29(5):187–194. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v29i5.8556

21. Samarkina I.V., Bashmakov I.S., Kolozov D.P., Kuzmenko N.P. The Future Image as a Component of Political Subjective Space: Testing the Conceptual Model. Polis. Political Studies. 2024;(5):66–81. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.05.05

22. Velikaya N.M., Doroshina A.V. Self-Identification of Youth in the Moscow Region as a Factor of Constructing the Image of the Russia’s Future. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology. 2022;22(1):31–38. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2022-22-1-31-38

About the authors:

Evgenii A. Avdeev, Cand.Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor of the Chair of Philosophy and Ethnology, North Caucasus Federal University (1 Pushkin St., Stavropol 355017, Russian Fede­ration), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4004-9610, Researcher ID: ABA-9634-2021, Scopus ID: 57217380810, ewg.avdeev@yandex.ru

Sergey N. Bredikhin, Dr.Sci. (Philol.), Professor of the Chair of Linguistics, Faculty of International Relations of the North Caucasus Federal University (1 Pushkin St., Stavropol 355017, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-4982, Researcher ID: Q-5512-2016, Scopus ID: 56642547700, bredichinsergey@yandex.ru

Sergey M. Vorobiev, Cand.Sci. (Polit.), Associate Professor of the Chair of Philosophy and Ethnology of the North Caucasus Federal University (1 Pushkin St., Stavropol 355017, Russian Fede­ration), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8893-2595, Researcher ID: ABB-4151-2021, Scopus ID: 57217390630, SPIN-code: 4483-1431, sergey_vorobev_54@mail.ru

Contribution of the authors:

E. A. Avdeev – formulation of overarching research goals and aims; development of methodology; application of statistical techniques to analyse or synthesize study data; conducting a research and investigation process, specifically data collection; preparation, creation and presentation of the published work, specifi­cally visualization.

S. N. Bredikhin – conducting a research and investigation process, specifically data collection; preparation, creation and presentation of the published work, specifically critical review.

S. M. Vorobiev – formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims; conducting a research and investigation process, specifically data collection; preparation, creation and presentation of the published work, specifically critical review.

Availability of data and materials. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

The authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 27.03.2025; revised 30.04.2025; accepted 06.05.2025.