E. V. Ostrovskaya, N. V. Dulina, E. V. Kargapolova, Yu. G. Mironova. Socio-Ecological System of a Region: Trends and Contradictions (the Case Study of the Astrakhan Region)

UDK 303.425.4(470.46)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.104.026.201803.538-557

Introduction. The study of the causes affecting the formation of the ecological situation in various regions of Russia seems to be of relevance. The purpose of the paper is to identify trends and contradictions in the transformation of the socio-ecological system of a region by means of a case study of the Astrakhan Region.

Materials and Methods. The materials used were the pieces of sociological research conducted in the Astrakhan Region in 2010-2016. Among the methods used were: questioning, interviewing, and analysis of statistical information. The study was conducted in terms of the systemic approach that combines the ecological and social components.

Results. The analysis of the causes of the unfavorable ecological situation in the Astrakhan Region has been carried out. The study has revealed lack of awareness among the residents of the existing level of air and water pollution, which usually characterize the ecological aspects of the quality of life of people, directly affecting their health, work efficiency, and development of the territorial community. Discrepancy between the positive assessment of air and water quality and the real state of affairs in the region has been revealed.

Discussion and Conclusions. The data obtained allow to draw a conclusion about the imbalance of the socio-ecological system of the Astrakhan Region and its unstable state. The practical significance of the study is in the possibility of using the results of the research to predict changes in the socio-ecological system of a region and in the development of methodological recommendations on how to manage it.

Keywords: socio-ecological systems, environmental threats, air quality, water quality, insecurity of people, public opinion, Astrakhan Region


1.Young O.R., Berkhout F., Gallopin G.C., Janssen M.A., Ostrom E., Leeuw S. van der. The globalization of socio-ecological system: an agenda for scientific research. Global Environmental Change. 2006; 16:304-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.004

2.Volkova S.N, Sivak E.E., Pashkova M.I., Shleenko A.V. [Nonlinear interactions and their modeling in social-ecological systems]. Vestnik Kurskoj gosudarstvennoj selskokhozyajstvennoy akademii = Bulletin of Kursk State Agricultural Academy. 2016; 2:77-80. Available at: http://www.journal-kgsha.ru/current-issues (accessed 14.06.2018). (In Russ.)

3.Moiseenko T. I. [V.I. Vernadsky and modern ecological problems]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekologiya = Bulletin of Tyumen State University. Ecology. 2013; 12:10-20. Available at: https://vestnik.utmn.ru/nature/vypuski-arhiv/biogeochemistry/2013/114116 (accessed 14.06.2018). (In Russ.)

4.Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. [Environment, security, development: Theoretical and methodological problems (part I)]. Geopolitika i bezopasnost = Geopolitics and Security. 2011; 3(15):29-37. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22284038 (accessed 14.06.2018). (In Russ.)

5.Gunderson L.H., Holling C.S. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington: Island Press; 2002. 536 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00041-7

6.Hamilton C. Why we resist the truth about climate change? Climate controversies: Science and politics. Brussels, 28 October 2010. Available at: http://climatecontroversies.ulb.ac.be/wp-content/uploads/slides/hamilton... (accessed 14.06.2018). (In Russ.)

7.O’Brien K., Leichenko R., Kelkar U., Venema H., Aandahl G., Tomkins H., Javed A., Bhadwal S., Barg S., Nygaard L., West J. Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Global Environmental Change. 2004; 14(4):303-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.01.001

8.Turner B.L., Kasperson R.E., Matson P.A., McCarthy J.J., Corell R.W., Chris- tensen L., Eckley N., Kasperson J.X., Luers A., Martello M.L., Polsky C., Pulsipher A., Schiller A. Science and technology for sustainable development special feature: a framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the US National Academy of Sciences. 2003; 100(14):8074-8079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231335100

9.Folke C., Carpenter S.R., Walker B., Scheffer M., Chapin T., Rockstrom J. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society. 2010; 15(4):20-28. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20 (accessed 14.06.2018).

10.Pahl-Wostl C. Water governance in the face of global change: From understanding to transformation. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21855-7

11.Hasselman L. Adaptive management; adaptive co-management; adaptive governance: what’s the difference? Australasian Journal of Environmental Management. 2016; 24(1):31-46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2016.1251857

12.Clifton D. Progressing a sustainable world: A socio-ecological resilience perspective. Journal of Sustainable Development. 2010; 3(4):74-96. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi= (accessed 14.06.2018).

13.Folke C., Hahn T., Olsson P., Norberg J. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2017; 30(1):441-473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511

14.Bressers H., Bressers N., Larrue C. Governance for drought resilience. Land and water drought management in Europe. Heidelberg: Springer Open; 2016. 266 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29671-5

15.Carpenter S., Walker B., Anderies J.M., Abel N. From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems. 2001; 4(8):765-781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9

16.Ostrovskaya E.V. [Environmental safety and challenges for adaptive management of natural resources in the caspian sea region]. Zashhita okruzhayushhey sredy v neftegazovom komplekse = Environmental protection in the oil and gas sector. 2011; 10:10-13. Available at: http://www.vniioeng.ru/inform/green/sod46 (accessed 14.06.2018). (In Russ.)

17.Estrina O.V. [Natural-environmental field of region]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya Problemy sotsialno-gumanitar- nogo znaniya = Bulletin of Volgograd State Technical University. Series: Issues of Social and Humanitarian Knowledge. 2011. 10(3):106-108. Available at: http://vstu.ru/uploadiblok/files/izvestiya/archive/6/2012-03.pdf (accessed 14.06.2018). (In Russ.)

18.Kargapolova E.V. [Social risk : the regional dimension]. Primo Aspestu. 2017; 1(29):9-16. Available at: http://vstu.ru/uploadiblok/files/primo-aspectu/Primo%20 aspectu%20%E2%84%96%201%20(129)%20-%202017.pdf (accessed 14.06.2018). (In Russ.)

19.Davydenko V.A., Romashkina G.F. [Assessments of susceptibility to the components of social space and to the levels of environmental threats]. Sotsialnoye prostranstvo = Social Area. 2017; 3(10):1-18. Available at: http://sa.isert-ran.ru/article/2308/full (accessed 14.06.2018). (In Russ.)

Submitted 05.07.2018; accepted for publication 27.07.2018; published online 28.09.2018.

About the authors:

Elena V. Ostrovskaya, Director of the Caspian Marine Scientific and Research Center (14 Shiryaeva St., Astrakhan 414045, Russia), Ph. D. (Geography), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0847-430X, eostrovskaya@mail.ru

Nadezhda V. Dulina, Head of the Department of Sociology, Volgograd State University (100 Universitetskiy Prospect, Volgograd 400062, Russia), Dr. Sci. (Sociology), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6471-7073, nv-dulina@volsu.ru

Ekaterina V. Kargapolova, Professor, Department of Sociology, Astrakhan State University (20a Tatishcheva St., Astrakhan 414056, Russia), Dr. Sci. (Sociology), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2892-3953, Researcher ID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/O-6734-2017, k474671@list.ru

Yulia G. Mironova, Head of the Department of Sociology, Astrakhan State University (20a Tatishcheva St., Astrakhan 414056 Russia), Ph. D. (Sociology), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1291-258X, lysjakova@mail.ru

Contribution of the authors:

Elena V. Ostrovskaya – critical analysis of theoretical material; analysis of the concept; preparation of the original version of the text of the article; interpretation of the results of the empirical research.

Nadezhda V. Dulina – critical analysis and revision of the text; formalized data analysis; analysis of scientific literature on the subject matter of the article; supervision of the data obtained.

Ekaterina V. Kargapolova – scientific supervision; organization and conduct of empirical research; interpretation of the results of the empirical research; finalization of the text of the article.

Yulia G. Mironova – preparation of the initial version of the text; formalized data analysis; analysis of scientific literature on the subject matter of the article.

For citation:

Ostrovskaya E.V., Dulina N.V., Kargapolova E.V., Mironova Yu.G. Socio-Ecological System of a Region: Trends and Contradictions (the Case Study of the Astrakhan Region). Regionologiya = Regionology. 2018; 26(3):538-557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.104.026.201803.538-557

All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

To download article

Лицензия Creative Commons
Материалы журнала "РЕГИОНОЛОГИЯ REGIONOLOGY" доступны по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная