N. E. Demeshko, G. L. Muradov, A. A. Irkhin, O. A. Moskalenko. “Decolonizationˮ and “Deimperializationˮ: Modern Western Policy Towards Fragmentation of Russia

UDК 327.2(4-15)(470+571)

doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.126.032.202401.010-030

Abstract

Introduction. Multinational Russia at various stages of its existence faces the playing out of the national question by opposing geopolitical centers. The discourse of “decolonization” and “deimperialization” of Russia has acquired a new level of relevance in the international arena after February 24, 2022. The purpose of the article is to identify and investigate the features of the destructive form of ethno-political mobilization in the regions of the Russian Federation through the construction and promotion of the discourse of “decolonization” and “deimperialization” of Russia by Western states.

Materials and Methods. The materials used in the study include U.S. legal documents, resolutions of the European Parliament, publications and speeches of representatives of the Western political elite and scientific and expert community, materials of the United States Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, content of various organizations, foreign mass media and media foreign agents. The methodological basis of the study is represented by systemic, geopolitical and instrumentalist approaches, as well as such methods as monitoring, discourse analysis and content analysis.

Results. The narrative of “deimperialization” and “decolonization” of Russia in the publications of the Western scientific and expert community and media materials is studied, and the political technologies of Western states oriented at the actualization of ethnic nationalism and, as a consequence, separatist tendencies in the regions of the Russian Federation are revealed. Western projects of practical policy oriented at actualization of national contradictions in the Russian Federation are implemented mainly through the following initiatives: holding events dedicated to “decolonization” and “deimperialization” of Russia; using representatives of Western-oriented national elites to actualize separatist tendencies in the regions of the Russian Federation; adopting declarations on “liberation” of the peoples of Russia from “colonial” dependence; popularization of information about the need for “decolonization”; and the use of the “decolonization” of Russia.

Discussion and Conclusion. “Decolonization” and “deimperialization” of Russia are focused on the implementation of a destructive form of ethno-political mobilization and fragmentation of the Russian Federation along national lines of settlement. The authors identify five technologies for the formation of ethnic nationalism in the regions of the Russian Federation, which are used by Western states in the process of modern confrontation with Russia. The results of the study will be useful for public authorities at both regional and federal levels to develop a set of measures aimed at countering the playing of the “national card” on the territory of Russia by competing geopolitical centers.

Keywords: “decolonization”, “deimperialization”, national question, separatism, ethno-political mobilization, ethnic nationalism, political technologies, Western policy towards Russia

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 23-28-00917 (https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-28-00917/).

For citation: Demeshko N.E., Muradov G.L., Irkhin A.A., Moskalenko O.A. “Decolonizationˮ and “Deimperializationˮ: Modern Western Policy Towards Fragmentation of Russia. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2024;32(1):10–30. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.126.032.202401.010-030

REFERENCES

1. Bovdunov A.L. Challenge of “Decolonisation” and Need for a Comprehensive Redefinition of Neocolonialism. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2022;22(4):645–658. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-645-658

2. Khodarkovsky M. Of Christianity, Enlightenment, and Colonialism: Russia in the North Caucasus, 1550–1800. The Journal of Modern History. 1999;71(2):394–430. https://doi.org/10.1086/235251

3. Kang B. Understanding the Ukrainian Conflict from the Perspective of Post-Soviet Decolonization. Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. 2020;9(2):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1353/reg.2020.0015

4. Mälksoo M. The Postcolonial Moment in Russia’s War Against Ukraine. Journal of Genocide Research. 2023;25(3-4):471–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2022.2074947

5. Hagen M. Does Ukraine Have a History? Slavic Review. 1995;54(3):658–673. https://doi.org/10.2307/2501741

6. Gerasimov I., Mogilner M. Deconstructing Integration: Ukraine’s Postcolonial Subjectivity. Slavic Review. 2015;74(4):715–722. https://doi.org/10.5612/slavicreview.74.4.715

7. Delwaide J. Identity and Geopolitics: Ukraine’s Grappling with Imperial Legacies. Harvard Ukrainian Studies. 2011;(32/33):179–207. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24711662 (accessed 22.10.2023).

8. Hagen M. Wartime Occupation and Peacetime Alien Rule: ‘Notes and Materials’ toward a(n) (Anti-) (Post-) Colonial History of Ukraine. Harvard Ukrainian Studies. 2015;34(1/4):153–194. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44364491 (accessed 22.10.2023).

9. Achkasov V.А. Ethno-Political Mobilization: An Attempt to Conceptualize the Idea. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations. 2014;(3):81–89. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: SMMLEH

10. Avksentev V.A., Aksiumov B.V., Gritsenko G.D. Ethnicity in Political Conflicts: Ethnicization of Politics and Politicization of Ethnicity. Political Science. 2020;(3):74–97. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2020.03.04

11. Achkasov V.A. The Role of “Enemy Image” in the Ethno-Political Mobilization Processes. Political Expertise: POLITEX. 2016;12(1):106–128. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: WKBFPV

12. Oskolkov P.V. Politicization of Ethnicity and Related Phenomena. World Eсonomy and International Relations. 2021;65(8):131–138. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-8-131-138

13. Potseluev S.P., Tsybenko S.N. The Phenomenon of National Mobilization: Clarifying the Concept. Ars Administrandi. 2019;11(1):1–23. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2019-1-1-23

14. Demeshko N.E., Irkhin A.A. The Republic of Türkiye and Ukraine: Using the Crimean Tatar Question in Foreign Policy after 2014. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2022;22(4):755–770. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-755-770

15. Irkhin A.A., Moskalenko O.A., Kabanova N.E., Demeshko N.E. The Rebirth of Empires: Contest and Cooperation of Russia and Türkiye in the Black Sea Region (Political and Historical Analysis). Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2023;31(2):214–237. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.123.031.202302.214-237

16. Demeshko N.E., Muradov G.L., Irkhin A.A., Moskalenko O.A. Russian and Turkic Worlds in Eurasia. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2023;16(6):153–182. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-6-93-153-182

17. Muradov G.L. [The Russian World and Crimean Passionarity]. The International Affairs. Special issue. 2022. Available at: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/38396 (accessed 09.08.2023). (In Russ.)

18. Savinov L.V. National Problem in Turkey. Federalism. 2012;(2):135–146. Available at: https://federalizm.rea.ru/jour/article/view/455 (accessed 25.10.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

19. Avatkov V.A., Sbitneva A.I. New Nationalism of Turkish Republic. RUDN Journal of Political Science. 2022;24(2):291–302. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-2-291-302

Submitted 26.03.2023; revised 21.06.2023; accepted 03.07.2023.

About the authors:

Natalya E. Demeshko, Cand.Sci. (Polit.), Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Sevastopol State University (33 Universitetskaya St., Sevastopol 299053, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9620-2410, Researcher ID: ABY-8555-2022, Scopus ID: 57759845100, natalidem93@mail.ru

Georgy L. Muradov, Cand.Sci. (History), Professor of Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (76 Vernadskogo Ave., Moscow 119454, Russian Federation), Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Crimea (13 Kirov Ave., Simferopol 295005, Russian Federation), Permanent Representative of the Republic of Crimea to the President of the Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2806-5821, pprk@ppcrimea.ru

Aleksandr A. Irkhin, Dr.Sci. (Polit.), Associate Professor, Head, Department of Political Science, Sevastopol State University (33 Universitetskaya St., Sevastopol 299053, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7895-550X, Researcher ID: A-4781-2019, Scopus ID: 57212405239, alex.irhin@mail.ru

Olga A. Moskalenko, Cand.Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Department of Theory and Practice of Translation, Sevastopol State University (33 Universitetskaya St., Sevastopol 299053, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4162-3162, Researcher ID: F-2699-2016, Scopus ID: 57211746837, kerulen@bk.ru

Contribution of the authors:

N. E. Demeshko – concept of the research; draft of the manuscript.

G. L. Muradov – development of the methodology; critical analysis of the text.

A. A. Irkhin – concept of the research; development of the methodology; critical analysis of the text.

O. A. Moskalenko – formal data analysis; critical analysis and editing of the text.

The authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.