A. A. Maksimenko, A. V. Zaitsev, O. S. Deyneka, A. V. Zyablikov, F. T. Akhunzyanova. Assessment by the Population of the Effectiveness of Digital Communication of the Heads of Regions in the Internet Dialogue “Power ‒ Societyˮ

doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.127.032.202402.217-241

UDК 004.9:004.738.5:32

Abstract

Introduction. The article is devoted to the study of the effectiveness of digital communication of the governorʼs corps with the society. This problem attracts the attention of many scholars, but there are very few works with empirical verification of the models proposed by various research authors, and there is a lack of substantiation and scientific understanding of the objective assessment of the effectiveness of digital dialog. The purpose of the study is to analyze and compare the effectiveness of digital communication of regional heads of the Central Federal District on the basis of empirical data and identify its strengths and weaknesses

Materials and Methods. To assess the effectiveness of digital communication of regional heads with the population, a study was conducted, which included 2 stages. At the first stage of the research the responsiveness of the authorities to the needs of the population was assessed by means of an online survey. The second stage of the research was realized through monitoring of social networks of the heads of regions of the Central Federal District. The tasks of the second stage included the search for answers to the questions about the popularity of regional policy among the population, about the compliance of the information agenda of the regional heads with the needs articulated in the regional social media, as well as about the effectiveness of response to certain problematic situations arising on the ground.

Results. One fifth of respondents addressed to the heads of regions via social networks with complaints and suggestions. About half of the respondents found it difficult to assess their satisfaction with the request sent. Almost a third of respondents expressed satisfaction with the response of the governorʼs services. Respondents assessed the work of governors with a predominance of positive assessments on the scales of openness and efficiency, as well as effectiveness. At the same time, according to the profile of citizensʼ assessments, the work of the governorʼs corps is conducted more according to its own agenda (rather than based on the problems of ordinary people), it is often performed in an ostentatious manner and with elements of imitation of activity.

Discussion and Conclusion. The results obtained allow us to attribute involvement in modern online communications, the ability to establish constant and effective feedback with the population to one of the most important competencies of the governor. The analysis shows that these qualities have so far fallen out of the personal priorities of some regional leaders. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of using the results of a comparative assessment of the constructiveness of online communication of governors of the regions of the Central Federal District with the population, weaknesses and potential of such a dialog.

Keywords: dialogue between government and society, digital space, public dialogue, openness of government, responsiveness of government, digital communications, social media

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation under Project No. FZEW-2023-0007.

For citation: Maksimenko A.A., Zaitsev A.V., Deyneka O.S., Zyablikov A.V., Akhunzyanova F.T. Assessment by the Population of the Effectiveness of Digital Communication of the Heads of Regions in the Internet Dialogue “Power ‒ Societyˮ. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2024;32(2):217–241. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.127.032.202402.217-241

REFERENCES

1. Bragina V.K., Gorshkova E.S. Culture of Dialogue Between Authorities and Society in Internet Communications. Communicology. 2014;3(1):120–125. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: RYFABR

2. Korosteleva M.A., Satyr T.S. Dialogue of State Power and Society in the Internet. Communicology. 2014;3(1):73–78. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: RYEZZJ

3. Dmitrenko O.V. Dialogue of the State and Society in the Internet as a Means of Information Counteraction in Mental War. Vestnik adyunkta. 2021;(4). Available at: https://vestnik-adyunkta.ru/soderzhanie-zhurnala/arkhiv-vypuskov/8-vestnik/322-dialog-gosudarstva-i-obshchestva-v-internete-kak-sredstvo-informatsionnogo-protivodejstviya-v-mentalnoj-vojne (accessed 20.10.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

4. Gadzhiev Kh.F. The Dialogue between a Government and Society in the Digital Age. Science. Culture. Society. 2022;28(2):81–97. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.19181/nko.2022.28.2.7

5. Zotov V.V., Gubanov A.V. Social Media as Dialogue Platforms for Citizens and Authorities of the Central Federal District’s Entities. Digital Sociology. 2021;4(4):28–39. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2021-4-4-28-39

6. Golub O.Yu. Contemporary Models of a Social Dialogue: The Regional Dimension. Siberian Socium. 2020;4(2):21–31. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: YWTXWT

7. Krasnoperov A.Yu. Municipal Authorities as Subjects of Mass Network Communication in the Information Age. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2023;(74):224–233. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/munitsipalnye-organy-vlasti-kak-subekty-massovoy-setevoy-kommunikatsii-v-informatsionnuyu-epohu (accessed 20.10.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

8. Sokolov A.V., Isaeva E.A. Transforming the Interaction Between Authorities and Civil Society in Digital: The Evidence from the Yaroslavl Region. RUDN Journal of Political Science. 2022;24(4):686–710. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-4-686-710

9. Chugunov A.V., Nizomutdinov B.A., Budyak A.A. Russian Regions Heads’ Telegram Channels: Testing of Research Tools. International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2022;10(11):141–146. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.25559/INJOIT.2307-8162.10.202211.141-146

10. Vasileva T.A., Tuzovsky B.A., Ovchinnikov D.S. Comparative Analysis of Media Indices Heads of Subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District in the Context of the Civil Dialogue Societies and Authorities. Issues of National and Federative Relations. 2021;11(6):1872–1878. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.35775/PSI.2021.75.6.019

11. Maiseeva E.G. Virtual Activity of Governors in Blogospher. Management Issues. 2012;(2):72–76. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://journal-management.com/issue/2012/02/11 (accessed 20.11.2023).

12. Filatova O.G. Heads of Russian Regions in Social Media: Audit of Public Communications. PR i reklama v izmenyayushchemsya mire: regionalnyy aspekt. 2020;(23):6–16. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: FTADBA

13. Filatova O.G. Heads of Subjects of the Russian Federation in Blogs and Social Networks: Communication Trends in the Early 2010s and 2020s. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences. 2020;21(2):26–42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-21-2-26-41

14. Popova O.V., Grishin N.V., Pogodina M.Ya. Communication of Youth with the Highest Officials of the Subjects of the Russian Federation on the Social Network “VKontakte” in 2022. Polis. Political Studies. 2013;(4):122–137. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.04.09

15. Kaminchenko D.I. Features of the Political Image of a Regional Leader on the Internet. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science. 2021;15(3):24–39. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2021-3-24-39

16. Kaminchenko D.I. Political Image of the Regional Leader on Instagram. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(8):18–34. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-8-18-34

17. Kaminchenko D.I. Comprehensive Analysis of a Regional Leader’s Image (Based on the Official Website Materials of the Government of the Nizhny Novgorod Region). Bulletin of the Perm University. Political Science. 2023;17(1):101–113. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-1-101-113

18. Kaminchenko D.I. The Image of the Modern Regional Leader: Network Analysis Results. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(9):40–56. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-9-40-56

19. Mityaeva Yu.A., Chernyshev Yu.G. The Use of Social Networks and Blogs in Shaping the Image of the Governors of South-Western Siberia. Izvestia of Altai State University. 2013;(4-1):281–286. Available at: https://izvestia.asu.ru/2013/4-1/pols/10.ru.html (accessed 20.11.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

20. Kadysheva E.V. Social Networks as a Tool for Forming the Image of the Head of the Region (On the Example of the Heads of Regions of the Volga Federal District). Political Science Issues. 2022;12(5):1408–1415. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: DNMBQM

21. Medvedeva N.V., Otorova A.A. Conflicts between Authorities and the Population in Russia in a Digital Society: Causes and Characteristics of the Course. Social Policy and Sociology. 2019;18(3):150–157. Available at: http://www.oscsbras.ru/upload/files/novosti-biblioteki/Конфликты между органами власти и населением.pdf (accessed 20.11.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

22. Rychikhina E.N., Neskorodeva E.P., Borovikova A.M. Interaction with the Population in Social Networks to Eliminate Conflicts “Local Authorities-Populationˮ. World of Science. Series: Sociology, Philology, Cultural Studies. 2022;13(3). Available at: https://sfk-mn.ru/pdf/31SCSK322.pdf (accessed 20.10.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

23. Kastorina E.N. [Internet Technology as a Factor in the Formation of Dialogue Culture of Power and Society]. Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences. 2009;(2):106–111. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: MSMWZP

24. Vissers S., Stolle D. The Internet and New Modes of Political Participation: Online Versus Offline Participation. Information, Communication and Society. 2014;17(8):937–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.867356

25. Vicente R.M., Novo A. An Empirical Analysis of E-participation. The Role of Social Networks and E-government Over Citizens’ Online Engagement. Government Information Quarterly. 2014;31(3):379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.12.006

26. Liu S.M., Yuan Q. The Evolution of Information and Communication Technology in Public Administration. Public Administration and Development. 2015;35(2):140–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1717

27. Baxter D.J. E-governance and E-participation via Online Citizen Budgets and Electronic Lobbying: Promises and Challenges. World Affairs. 2017;180(4):4–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820018771137

28. Schwarz O. Facebook Rules: Structures of Governance in Digital Capitalism and the Control of Generalized Social Capital. Theory, Culture & Society. 2019;36(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419826249

29. Adler R.P., Goggin J. What do we mean by “Civic Engagement”? Journal of Transformative Education. 2005;3(3):236–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344605276792

30. Wilson E. The Network Society and Democracy Online. Perspectives on Politics. 2006;4(1):218–219. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706750149

31. Eggeling K., Versloot L. Taking Trust Online: Digitalisation and the Practice of Information Sharing in Diplomatic Negotiations. Review of International Studies. 2023;49(4):637–656. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000559

32. O’Brien T. Digital Activism and the State. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society. 2021;4(1):1973291. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.1973291

33. Renz B., Sullivan J. Making a Connection in the Provinces? Russia’s Tweeting Governors. East European Politics. 2013;29(2):135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2013.779258

34. Kopalova O.S., Cherkasova V.Yu. Information Interaction of Public Authorities with the Population. Municipality: Economics and Management. 2017;(2):14–20. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://editorial.municipality.expert/file/29E23757-28E4-4D7D-B493-26D6E7BADB93 (accessed 13.03.2024).

35. Thorikov B.A., Kornev V.V. Internet Communications of State Civil Employees: International Experience and Russian Practice. Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law. 2018;43(4):633–639. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://nv.bsu.edu.ru/nv/mag/detail.php?ID=524688 (accessed 13.03.2024).

36. Demushina O.N. Influence Factors for E-Participation. Ars Administrandi. 2017;9(2):132–151. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: http://ars-administrandi.com/index.php/arsadm/article/view/31 (accessed 13.03.2024).

37. Pyasetskaya E.N. Efficiency Factors of Electronic Participation of Citizens in Government and Society Interaction. Koncept. 2018;(2):92‒97. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24422/MCITO.2018.2.10711

38. Barbakov G.O., Kurashenko I.A., Ustinova O.V. Interaction of Municipal Authorities with Populations: Forms and Evaluation Criteria. Fundamental Research. 2015;(12-4):746–750. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=39616 (accessed 13.03.2024).

39. Deineka O.S. The Experience of the Empirical Studies of Political and Economic Consciousness. Vestniks of Saint Petersburg University. Series 16. Psychology. Education. 2015;(3):13–26. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: VCQPSR

40. Deineka O.S., Maksimenko A.A. Reflection of the Decision on a Special Military Operation in the Mass Consciousness. Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology. 2023;8(1):89–112. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: http://soc-econom-psychology.ru/cntnt/bloks/dop-menu/archive/n2023/t8-1/n23-01-03.html (accessed 13.03.2024).

About the authors:

Aleksandr A. Maksimenko, Dr.Sci. (Sociol.), Cand.Sci. (Psychol.), Associate Professor, Professor of Department of Social Science, HSE University (20 Myasnitskaya St., Moscow 101000, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0891-4950, Scopus ID: 57219144362, Maximenko.Al@gmail.com

Alexander V. Zaitsev, Dr.Sci. (Polit.), Professor of the Chair of Philosophy, Cultural Studies and Social Communications of Kostroma State University (17 Dzerzhinskogo St., Kostroma 156000, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4977-8828, aleksandr-kostroma@mail.ru

Olga S. Deyneka, Dr.Sci. (Psychol.), Professor, Acting Head of Chair of Political Psychology, Saint-Petersburg State University (7/9 Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, St. Petersburg 199034, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8224-2190, Scopus ID: 57194202822, osdeyneka@yandex.ru

Aleksey V. Zyablikov, Dr.Sci. (Hist.), Professor, Head of the Chair of Philosophy, Cultural Studies and Social Communications, Kostroma State University (17 Dzerzhinskogo St., Kostroma 156000, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2054-0066, a.zyablikov@yandex.ru

Farida T. Akhunzianova, Cand.Sci. (Cult.), Associate Professor of the Chair of Philosophy, Cultural Studies and Social Communications, Kostroma State University (17 Dzerzhinskogo St., Kostroma 156000, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4610-5241, Researcher ID: HQJ-4229-2023, farida.ahunzyano@mail.ru

Contribution of the authors:

A. A. Maksimenko – research concept; research design; organization and conduct of the survey; critical analysis and revision of the text.

A. V. Zaitsev – research idea; research concept; critical text analysis.

O. S. Deyneka – Citizen Questionnaire methodology; preparation of the initial version of the text.

A. V. Zyablikov – research concept; critical text analysis.

F. T. Akhunzyanova – monitoring; making calculations; preparing the initial version of the text.

Availability of data and materials. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 30.10.2023; revised 04.03.2024; accepted 13.03.2024.