A. D. Volkov, A. V. Simakova. Arctic Single-Industry City: The Population’s Perception of Their Future in the Prospects for its Development

UDК 314.145:616-36.21

DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.121.030.202204.851-881

Abstract

Introduction. The relevance of the study is due to the strategic necessity of consolidating human capital in the Arctic territories, which determines the importance of a deeper study of the connection between the life strategies of the population and the local problems of monotowns, as hard points for the formation of the economic space of the Arctic. The purpose of the article is to identify the reasons for the formation of migration attitudes of the population of the monotown.

Materials and Methods. The information basis of the study was the data of official statistics and the results of a questionnaire based survey of the population of Kostomuksha district, conducted in the fall of 2021. The participants of the survey were representatives of the population permanently residing in the district, aged 15‒74. The average age of the respondents was 44.9. The sample size was 697 people. The analysis was conducted using the SPSS software. The final conclusions were based on a combination of methods of spatial economics, the theory of sustainable development and the dialectical approach.

Results. Environmental features were identified by way of comparing the data of sociological survey of the population (town’s problems, satisfaction with different aspects of life), the results of previous studies and expeditions of the authors and the data of official statistics. The severity and features of the migration attitudes of the population were established, the social portrait of the migration-prone part of the population was examined.

Discussion and Conclusion. Based on the correlation between the environmental features of the territory and the results of the migration attitudes analysis, conclusions were made concerning the competitiveness of Kostomuksha district in terms of reproduction of its human capital and social sustainability, sustainable and favorable ecological conditions, supported in part by the stable operation of the city-forming enterprise, as well as general protection of the population from crime. Measures were proposed for the transition to an expanded quality of human capital reproduction. The results of the study and the identified threats to local social stability make it possible to form an analytical basis for their timely elimination, and, in a broader context, are of practical importance for managing the development of the Russian Arctic economic space at all levels of administrative regulation. The findings will form the basis of analytical materials addressed to the subjects of state and municipal government.

Keywords: single-industry town, Russian Arctic, migration, social sustainability, human capital, population survey, Kostomuksha

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgements. The authors are grateful to O. V. Derusova for help in preparing the graphic materials for the article. The authors also express their gratitude to Russian Journal of Regional Studies reviewers and editorial staff for invaluable recommendations, advice and tips which help to enhance our scientific study.

Funding. The study was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 21-18-00500 “Institutional engineering of monocities in the Arctic zone ‒ modernization and sustainable development”.

For citation: Volkov A.D., Simakova A.V. Arctic Single-Industry City: The Population’s Perception of Their Future in the Prospects for its Development. Regionology. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2022; 30(4):851–881. doi: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.121.030.202204.851-881

REFERENCES

1. Karnaeva A., Kulikova O., Mazlova E., Buryak A. Aged Diesel and Heavy Metal Pollution in the Arctic Tundra (Yamal Peninsula, Russia). Science of the Total Environment. 2021;792. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148471

2. Badina S. Prediction of Socioeconomic Risks in the Cryolithic Zone of the Russian Arctic in the Context of Upcoming Climate Changes. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2020;31(4):396–403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/s1075700720040036

3. Hanaček K., Kröger M., Scheidel A., Rojas F., Martinez-Alier J. On Thin Ice – The Arctic Commodity Extraction Frontier and Environmental Conflicts. Ecological Economics. 2022;191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107247

4. Gritsenko D., Efimova F. Is there Arctic Resource Curse? Evidence from the Russian Arctic Regions. Resources Policy. 2020;65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101547

5. Fauzer V.V., Smirnov A.V. Migration of the Russian Arctic Population: Models, Routes, Results. Arctic: Ecology and Economy. 2020;(4):4–18. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.25283/2223-4594-2020-4-4-18

6. Chanysheva A., Kopp P., Romasheva N., Nikulina A. Migration Attractiveness as a Factor in the Development of the Russian Arctic Mineral Resource Potential. Resources. 2021;10(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10060065

7. Skufina T.P., Mitroshina M.N. Transformation of the Socio-Economic Space of the Russian Arctic in the Context of Geopolitics, Macroeconomics, and Internal Factors of Development. Arctic and North. 2020;(41):87–112. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). doi: https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.41.87

8. Fauzer V., Lytkina T., Smirnov A. Impact of Migrations on the Demographic Structures Transformation in the Russian North, 1939–2019. Regional Science Policy and Practice. 2022;14(1):48–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12357

9. Kumo K., Litvinenko T. Post-Soviet Population Dynamics in the Russian Extreme North: A Case of Chukotka. Polar Science. 2019;21:58–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.11.002

10. Lamanes T., Deacon L. Supporting Social Sustainability in Resource-Based Communities Through Leisure and Recreation. The Canadian Geographer. 2019;63(1):145–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12492

11. Skufina T.P., Baranov S.V. Specific of Population’s Consumption: The Trail of Arctic Residents in Sberbank Big Data. Problems of Territory’s Development. 2020;(6):21–34. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2020.6.110.2

12. Tatarkin A.I., Loginov V.G., Zakharchuk E.A. Socioeconomic Problems in Development of the Russian Arctic Zone. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2017;87(1):12–21. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.7868/S086958731701011X

13. Simakova A.V. Youth Migratory Intentions at (Post) Extractive Arctic Mono-Industrial Cities: Live or Leave? Social Policy and Sociology. 2019;18(2):134–144. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17922/2071-3665-2019-18-2-134-144

14. Korchak E.A., Serova N.A. The Migration Factor in the Formation of the Human Capital of the Arctic Territories of Russia. Vestnik of North-East Federal University. Economics. Sociology. Culturology. 2019;(2):24–30. Available at: https://vfueconom.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/10 (accessed 01.03.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

15. Young O.R. Arctic Futures – Future Arctics? Sustainability. 2021;13(16). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169420

16. Fauzer V.V., Smirnov A.V., Fauzer G.N. Demographic Assessment of the Sustainability of Small and Medium-sized Cities in the Russian North. Economy of Region. 2021;17(2):552–569. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-2-14

17. Bjerke L., Mellander C. Moving Home Again? Never! The Locational Choices of Graduates in Sweden. The Annals of Regional Science. 2017;59:707–729. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0777-2

18. Törmä H., Kujala S., Kinnunen J. The Employment and Population Impacts of the Boom and Bust of Talvivaara Mine in the Context of Severe Environmental Accidents – A CGE Evaluation. Resources Policy. 2015;46(2):127–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.09.005

19. Petrov A. Post-Staple Bust: Modeling Economic Effects of Mine Closures and Post-Mine Demographic Shifts in an Arctic Economy (Yukon). Polar Geography. 2010;33(1-2):39–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2010.494850

20. Shiklomanov N., Streletskiy D., Suter L., Orttung R., Zamyatina N. Dealing with the Bust in Vorkuta, Russia. Land Use Policy. 2020;93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.021

21. Druzhinin P.V. Features of Population Distribution in Russia and Finland: Impact of Geographical Factors and Universities. Region: Ekonomika i Sociologya. 2020;(3):165–189. (In Rus. abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20200307

22. Sekushina I.A. Assessing the Balance of the Urban Settlement System in the European North of Russia. Regionology. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2021;29(3):642–665. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.116.029.202103.642-665

23. Vallance S., Perkins H.C., Dixon J.E. What is Social Sustainability? A Clarification of Concepts. Geoforum. 2011;42(3):342–348. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002

24. Littig B., Griessler E. Social Sustainability: A Catchword between Political Pragmatism and Social Theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development. 2005;8(1-2):65–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2005.007375

25. Suopajärvi L., Poelzer G.A., Ejdemo T., Klyuchnikova E., Korchak E., Nygaard V. Social Sustainability in Northern Mining Communities: A Study of the European North and Northwest Russia. Resources Policy. 2016;47:61–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.11.004

26. Behringer K., Szegedi K. The Role of CSR in Achieving Sustainable Development-Theoretical Approach. European Scientific Journal. 2016;12(22):10–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n22p10

27. Bareev M.Yu., Kurmyshkina O.N. External Migration and Loss of Social Capital in the Regional Society. Regionology. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2022;30(1):31–54. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.118.030.202201.031-054

28. Volkov A.D., Tishkov S.V., Karginova-Gubinova V.V., Shcherbak A.P. Environmental Problems of the Arctic Region: Its State and Dynamics as Perceived by the Population (Results of a Sociological Survey in Arctic Karelia). Region: Ekonomika i Sociologya. 2021;(3):203–239. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20210309

29. Volkov A.D., Tishkov S.V., Druzhinin P.V. Natural Resources, Settlement system and the Role of Single-Industry towns in the Spatial Organization Development of the Arctic Karelia Regional Economy. Arctic: Ecology and Economy. 2021;11(4):582–595. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). doi: https://doi.org/10.25283/2223-4594-2021-4-582-595

30. Guschina I.A., Pologhenceva O.A. Local Communities in the Russian Arctic: A Sociological Portrait (Based on Results of a Study in the Murmansk Region). ECO. 2021;51(10):91-109. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). doi: https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2021-10-91-109

Submitted 06.03.2022; approved after reviewing 12.04.2022; accepted for publication 25.04.2022.

About the authors:

Alexander D. Volkov, Junior Researcher, Institute of Economics, Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences (50 Nevsky Ave., Petrozavodsk 185030, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-8483, Researcher ID: AAF-8665-2020, Scopus ID: 57211205634, kov8vol@gmail.com

Anna V. Simakova, Leading Specialist, Budget Monitoring Center of Petrozavodsk State University (33 Lenin St., Petrozavodsk 185910, Russian Federation), Researcher, Institute of Economics, Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences (50 Nevsky Ave., Petrozavodsk 185030, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1990-9826, Researcher ID: K-3038-2018, Scopus ID: 57211977286, simakova@petrsu.ru

Contribution of the authors:

A. D. Volkov – scientific problem statement; development of the research methodology; gathering of analytical data; data analysis; critical analysis and revision of the text.

A. V. Simakova – development of the research methodology; gathering, systematization and processing of analytical data; critical analysis and revision of the text.

The authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

To download article