R. O. Reinhardt, K. A. Nemudrov. Development of Scientific Diasporas as a Tool of Science Diplomacy: Italian Case
https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.129.033.202503.468-482
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xugijm
УДК / UDC 001:341.7 (450)
Abstract
Introduction. Scientific diasporas are considered both as participants in international cooperation in science and technology and as a foreign policy resource of states. Depending on the degree of integration of their members into the academic environment of the host countries, some communities are formed naturally, others – thanks to the support of the countries of origin. The case of Italy is unique combining both above scenarios. The aim of the study is a comprehensive analysis based on empirical material of the ways of forming modern Italian scientific diaspora structures in various regions of the world.
Materials and Methods. The collection of empirical data included the analysis of official documents of the Italian MFA alongside information resources of 24 associations of Italian researchers abroad; conducting semi-structured interviews with the heads of the respective associations and science attachés. Quantitative analysis allowed statistical processing of the demographic indicators of associations, assessing the effectiveness of their interaction and the representation of various research fields. Statistical processing of the obtained data was carried out using modern software (Microsoft Excel). Qualitative analysis was implemented through the analysis of information resources, thematic interview research and comparative analysis of the associations’ activities.
Results. The study found that most of the analyzed associations were established in 2014–2021 in the context of implementing the “Sistema Paese” foreign policy course. Over the past three years, 11 of them have existed rather formally. Where associations continue to operate, they cover various research areas, primarily natural and exact sciences (37 % – physics and engineering, 26 – chemistry, 18 % – biology and medicine). The number of members varies from several dozen to 3 600 researchers. The average assessment by informants of the effectiveness of their organizations and interaction with Italian diplomatic missions amounts to 74 %. Although the science attachés made critical comments regarding communication with compatriot scientists, in most cases they expressed satisfaction with this interaction.
Discussion and Conclusion. The results may be of interest to researchers of science diplomacy; developers of strategies for interaction with compatriots living abroad; science attachés and other employees of departments involved in international cooperation in science and technology.
Keywords: scientific diaspora, science diplomacy, international cooperation in science and technology, Italy’s foreign policy, science attaché
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding. The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation, project No. 23-78-10136.
For citation: Reinhardt R.O., Nemudrov K.A. Development of Scientific Diasporas as a Tool of Science Diplomacy: Italian Case. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2025;33(3):468–482. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.129.033.202502.468-482
REFERENCES
1. Raynkhardt R.O., Panov A.N. Interpretations of “Diplomacy for Science” by Russian Scholars and Diplomats. Polis. Political Studies. 2022;(2):115–129. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.02.09
2. Raynkhardt R.O., Maslova E.A. Italian State Policy in Science and Education. The Bryansk State University Herald. 2017;(1):72–76. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://clck.ru/3N4Xfu (accessed 19.05.2025).
3. Reinhardt R.O., Maslova E.A. [Specific Features of Current Scientific and Educational Policy in Italy]. Secondary Vocational Education (SVE). 2017;(4):58–60. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/yujtkr
4. Sbalchiero S. Scienziati italiani all’estero: i numeri delle parole. Italian Journal of Social Policy. 2017;(4):103–121. (In Ital.) Available at: https://www.futura-editrice.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/07sbalchiero.pdf (accessed 19.05.2025).
5. Sbalchiero S., Tuzzi A. Italian Scientists Abroad in Europe's Scientific Research Scenario: High Skill Migration as a Resource for Development in Italy. International Migration. 2017;55(4):171–187. (In Ital.) Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14682435/2017/55/4 (accessed 19.05.2025).
6. Malakhov V.A., Vasileva I.N., Belov F.D. Structure of International Migration of Researchers. Case Study of Russia. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2020;13(5):232–246. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.14
7. Allakhverdyan A. Staff Decline in Technical and Natural Sciences and Emigration of Russian Researchers. The Science and Innovations. 2020;(8):80–83. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://clck.ru/3N4eoM (accessed 19.05.2025).
8. Malakhov V.A., Smirnova A.V. A Look from Abroad: Problems and Prospects of Interaction with the Russian Scientific Expatriate Community. Science Governance and Scientometrics. 2019;14(4):584–611. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) URL: https://sie-journal.ru/assets/uploads/issues/2019/4(34).pdf (дата обращения: 19.05.2025).
9. Bezverbny V.A. Russian Scientific Diaspora in Foreign Countries: Scales and Factors of “Brain Drain” at the Present Stage. Scientific Review. Series 2. Human Sciences. 2018;(4/5):26–34. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.26653/2076-4685-2018-4-5-03
10. Yurevich M., Erkina D., Tsapenko I. Measuring International Mobility of Russian Scientists: a Bibliometric Approach. World Eсonomy and International Relations. 2020;64(9):53–62. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-9-53-62
11. Subbotin A., Aref S. Brain Drain and Brain Gain in Russia: Analyzing International Migration of Researchers by Discipline using Scopus Bibliometric Data 1996–2020. Scientometrics. 2021;(126):7875–7900. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-021-04091-x (accessed 19.05.2025).
12. Simavoryan A. Azerbaijan’s Policies Concerning Interaction between the State and Diaspora: Science, Education and Information Areas. 21st Century. 2018;(4):79–91. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: http://www.intelros.ru/pdf/21_vek/2018_04/7.pdf (accessed 19.05.2025).
13. Gëdeshi I., King R. The Albanian Scientific Diaspora: Can the Brain Drain be Reversed? Migration and Development. 2019;10(1):19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2019.1677072
14. Vladimirova D.A. The Japanese Diaspora in the Public and Political Life of the United States in the Second Half of the XX–XXI Centuries. Oriental Institute Journal. 2023;(2):23–35. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24866/2542-1611/2023-2/23-35
15. Echeverría-King L.F., Camacho Toro R., Figueroa P. at al. Organized Scientific Diaspora and Its Contributions to Science Diplomacy in Emerging Economies: The Case of Latin America and the Caribbean. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 2022;(7):893593. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.893593
16. Bokeriya S.A., Danilov V.V. Cultural Diplomacy of Italy within the EU Cultural Strategy. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2019;19(4):643–653. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-kulturnoy-diplomatii-italii-na-sovremennom-etape(accessed 19.05.2025).
17. Ponomarev A.D. [“System Italy” as the Basis of Modern Italy’s Cultural Diplomacy]. Alleya Nauki. 2021;(4):837–840. (In Russ.) Available at: https://clck.ru/3N4ocF (accessed 19.05.2025).
18. Tabarintseva-Romanova K.M. “Digital Turn” in Cultural Diplomacy. Vlast'. 2022;(6):253–257. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tsifrovoy-povorot-v-kulturnoy-diplomatii-italii (accessed: 19.05.2025).
19. Raynkhardt R.O. “Italy System” as a Case of Innovative Economic Diplomacy. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2015;(6):165–173. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2015-6-45-165-173
20. Malakhov V.A., Uzyumova N.V. Russian Science at the Crossroads: the Volatility of Migration Sentiment and New Models of International Cooperation. Sociology of Science and Technology. 2024;15(2):122–139. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2079-0910-2024-2-122-139
About the authors:
Roman O. Reinhardt, Cand.Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Deputy Head of Department of Diplomacy, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (76 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow 119454, Russian Federation), ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0890-8844, Researcher ID: F-3523-2016, Scopus ID: 57193744803, SPIN-code: 8974-3536, don.reinhardt@mail.ru
Konstantin A. Nemudrov, Postgraduate, Department of Diplomacy, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (76 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow 119454, Russian Federation), ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1651-8563, nemudrov.k.a@my.mgimo.ru
Contribution of the authors:
R. O. Reinhardt – conceptualization; research supervision; data analysis; editing and finalization of the text; data visualization.
K. A. Nemudrov – methodology development; data collection; writing the original text.
Availability of data and materials. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.
The authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Submitted 23.01.2025; revised 31.03.2025; accepted 07.04.2025.
All the materials of the "REGIONOLOGY" journal are available under Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0