G. A. Reznik, N. A. Korobkova. Self-Employment in the Non-Observed Economy and Its Impact on Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis

UDК 338.242 

DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.117.029.202104.794-819

Abstract

Introduction. The study was motivated by the ambiguity in assessing the impact of self-employment on economic growth, especially in terms of non-observed self-employment. According to the research hypothesis, informal self-employment contributes to economic growth. Based on the results of the study conducted, the article summarizes and systematizes the theoretical views of scientists on the assessment of the nature of the impact of informal self-employment on economic growth.

Materials and Methods. Scientific papers published in 2000–2020 in journals indexed by Scopus and Web of Science formed the theoretical basis of the study. The choice of this time period was justified by significant changes in the labor market caused by the increase in the number of self-employed people. The key method employed was meta-analysis of empirical research papers on the issues under study. This method makes it possible to generalize, evaluate, and analyze the results of empirical research, objectively identifying the regularities existing between research results and sources of disagreement.

Results. An analysis of the essence of the concept of non-observed economy has been presented; the peculiarity of informal self-employment, as part of the non-observed economy, has been revealed. The points of view on the impact of the non-observed economy on economic growth have been considered; arguments from both points of view and the results of research on different countries, including Russia, have been presented. It has also been shown which research methods were used by various authors to assess the dependence of shadow self-employment. The studies that have the greatest effectiveness and universality in terms of possible practical use of the results obtained have been highlighted. The prerequisites and features of the formation of informal self-employment have been identified, its impact on economic growth has been estimated.

Discussion and Conclusion. Recommendations for further theoretical and methodological research of the considered issues have been produced. The conclusions and results obtained can be useful in the further development of the Russian system of regulating the activities of self-employed people, since its effective construction requires scientific study and methodological substantiation of various options for its development using the experience of other countries.

Keywords: non-observed economy, shadow economy, self-employed, socio-economic development, economic growth, institutional transformations

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding. The study was conducted with financial support from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research as part of the scientific project No. 20-11-50138.

For citation: Reznik G.A., Korobkova N.A. Self-Employment in the Non-Observed Economy and Its Impact on Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis. Regionology = Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2021; 29(4):794-819. doi: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.117.029.202104.794-819

REFERENCES

1. Medina L., Schneider F.G. Shedding Light on the Shadow Economy: A Global Database and the Interaction with the Official One. CESifo Working Paper No. 7981. 2019. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3502028 (accessed 02.04.2021). (In Eng.)

2. Schneider F., Buehn A. Shadow Economy: Estimation Methods, Problems, Results and Open Questions. Open Economics. 2018; 1(1):1-29. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/openec-2017-0001

3. Friedman G. Workers without Employers: Shadow Corporations and the Rise of the Gig Economy. Review of Keynesian Economics. 2014; 2(2):171-188. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2014.02.03

4. Green D.D. Fueling the Gig Economy: A Case Study Evaluation of Upwork.com. Management and Economics Research Journal. 2018; 4. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.18639/MERJ.2018.04.523634

5. Gerxhani K. The Informal Sector in Developed and Less Developed Countries: A Literature Survey. Public choice. 2004; 120:267-300. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000044287.88147.5e

6. Alm J., Embaye A. Using Dynamic Panel Methods to Estimate Shadow Economies around the World, 1984–2006. Public Finance Review. 2013; 41(5):510-543. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142113482353

7. Nureev R.M., Akhmadeev D.R. Informal Unemployment in Russia: New Tendency of Development in XXI Century. Аktuаlnye voprosy khozyajstvennoj prаktiki = Journal of Economic Regulation. 2019; 10(3):6-22. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2019.10.3.006-022

8. Lizina O.M., Badokina T.E. Assessment of the Shadow Component in the Structure of the National Economy. Moskovskij ehkonomicheskij zhurnal = Moscow Journal. 2020; 9:155-165. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.24411/2413-046X-2020-10620

9. Buehn A., Schneider F. Shadow Economies in Highly Developed OECD Countries: What Are the Driving Forces? Economics Working Papers. 2013. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/jku/econwp/2013_17.html (accessed 09.03.2021). (In Eng.)

10. Ihrig J., Moe K.S. Lurking in the Shadows: The Informal Sector and Government Policy. Journal of Development Economics. 2004; 73(2):541-557. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.04.004

11. Dell’Anno R. The Shadow Economy in Portugal: An Analysis with the MIMIC Approach. Journal of Applied Economics. 2007; 10(2):253-277. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2007.12040490

12. Anderson J.E. State Tax Rankings: What Do They and Don’t They Tell Us? National Tax Journal. 2012; 65(4):985-1010. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2012.4.13

13. Buehn A., Schneider F. Corruption and the Shadow Economy: Like Oil and Vinegar, Like Water and Fire? International Tax and Public Finance. 2012; 19:172-194. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9175-y

14. Bovi M., Dell’Anno R. The Changing Nature of the OECD Shadow Economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2010; 20:19-48. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-009-0138-8

15. Li P. The Underground Economy of Urban Villages. Urban Village Renovation. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 125-136. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8971-3_13

16. Vousinas G.L. Shadow Economy and Tax Evasion. The Achilles Heel of Greek Economy. Determinants, Effects and Policy Proposals. Journal of Money Laundering Control. 2017; 20(4):386-404. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-11-2016-0047

17. Choi J.P., Thum M. Corruption and the Shadow Economy. International Economic Review. 2005; 46(3):817-836. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2005.00347.x

18. Baklouti N., Boujelbene Y. A Simultaneous Equation Model of Economic Growth and Shadow Economy: Is there a Difference between the Developed and Developing Countries? Economic Change and Restructuring. 2020; 53(1):151-170. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-018-9235-8

19. Dreher A., Kotsogiannis C., McCorriston S. How Do Institutions Affect Corruption and the Shadow Economy? International Tax and Public Finance. 2009; 16. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9089-5

20. Schneider F., Raczkowski K., Mróz B. Shadow Economy and Tax Evasion in the EU. Journal of Money Laundering Control. 2015; 18(1):34-51. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2014-0027

21. Oleynikova E. Exploring Necessity of Smart Management for Millenials in Digital Space. Functional Aspects of Intercultural Communication. Translation and Interpreting Issues. 2020; 4:749. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.22363/2686-8199-2020-7-749-755

22. Meager N. Foreword: JMO Special Issue on Self-Employment/Freelancing. Journal of Management & Organization. 2016; 22(6):756-763. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.42

23. Stone D.L., Deadrick D.L., Lukaszewski K.M., Johnson R. The Influence of Technology on the Future of Human Resource Management. Human Resource Management Review. 2015; 25(2):216-231. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.002

24. Borghi P., Mori A., Semenza R. Self-Employed Professionals in the European Labour Market. A Comparison between Italy, Germany and the UK. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research. 2018; 24(4):405-419. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258918761564

25. Maniatis A. Tax Evasion. E-Journal of Science & Technology. 2018; 13(3). Available at: http://ejst.uniwa.gr/issues/issue_56/Maniatis_56.pdf (accessed 18.06.2021). (In Eng.)

26. Elgin C., Oztunali O. Institutions, Informal Economy, and Economic Development. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2014; 50(4):145-162. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X500409

27. Sarte P.D.G. Informality and Rent-Seeking Bureaucracies in a Model of Long-Run Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2000; 46(1):173-197. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(00)00020-9

28. Loayza N.V. Informality in the Process of Development and Growth. The World Economy. 2016; 39(12):1856-1916. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12480

29. Amaral P.S., Quintin E. A Competitive Model of the Informal Sector. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2006; 53(7):1541-1553. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.07.016

30. Ihrig J., Moe K.S. The Influence of Government Policies on Informal Labor: Implications for Long-Run Growth. De Economist. 2000; 148:331-343. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004038119150

31. Feld L.P., Schneider F. Survey on the Shadow Economy and Undeclared Earnings in OECD Countries. German Economic Review. 2010; 11(2):109-149. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2009.00466.x

32. Giles D.E.A., Lindsay M.T., Werkneh G. The Canadian Underground and Measured Economies: Granger Causality Results. Applied Economics. 2002; 34(18):2347-2352. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840210148021

33. Schneider F., Hametner B. The Shadow Economy in Colombia: Size and Effects on Economic Growth. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy. 2014; 20(2):293-325. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2013-0059

34. Schneider F., Enste D.H. Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature. 2000; 38(1):77-114. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.1.77

35. Alañón A., Gómez-Antonio M. Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy in Spain: A Structural Model with Latent Variables. Applied Economics. 2005; 37(9):1011-1025. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500081788

36. Mapp T., Moore W. The Informal Economy and Economic Volatility. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies. 2015; 8(1-2):185-200. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17520843.2014.969291

37. Kiselkina O., Salyahov E., Fakhrutdinov R., Kamasheva A. Assessment of Influence of the Labor Shadow Sector on the Economic Growth of the Russian Economy with the Using Methods of Statistical Modeling. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015; 23:180-184. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00525-0

38. Zaman G., Goschin Z. Shadow Economy and Economic Growth in Romania. Cons and Pros. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015; 22:80-87. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00229-4

39. La Porta R., Shleifer A. The Unofficial Economy and Economic Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, the Brookings Institution. 2008; 39(2):275-363. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.3386/w14520

40. Kim B.Y., Kang Y. The Informal Economy and the Growth of Small Enterprises in Russia. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change. 2009; 17(2):351-376. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2009.00348.x

41. Goel R.K., Saunoris J.W., Schneider F. Growth in the Shadows: Effect of the Shadow Economy on US Economic Growth over More than a Century. Contemporary Economic Policy. 2019. 37(1):50-67. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12288

42. Duarte P. The Relationship between GDP and the Size of the Informal Economy: Empirical Evidence for Spain. Empirical Economics. 2017; 52:1409-1421. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1109-1

43. Yerrabati S. Self-Employment and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Is More Self-Employment Better? Journal of Economic Studies. 2021. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-08-2020-0419

44. González-Sánchez V.M., Martínez R.A., de los Ríos-Sastre S. An Empirical Study for European Countries: Factors Affecting Economic Growth and Self-Employment by Gender. Sustainability. 2020; 12(22). (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229450

45. Estrin S., Mickiewicz T. Shadow Economy and Entrepreneurial Entry. Review of Development Economics. 2012; 16(4):559-578. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12004

46. Willis D.B., Hughes D.W., Boys K.A., Swindall D.C. Economic Growth through Entrepreneurship: Determinants of Self‐Employed Income across Regional Economies. Papers in Regional Science. 2020; 99(1):73-95. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12482

47. Loayza N.V., Rigolini J. Informal Employment: Safety Net or Growth Engine? World Development. 2011; 39(9):1503-1515. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.003

48. Ugur M. Corruption’s Direct Effects on Per‐Capita Income Growth: A Meta‐Analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2014; 28(3):472-490. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12035

49. De Dominicis L., Florax R.J.G.M, De Groot H.L.F. A Meta‐Analysis on the Relationship between Income Inequality and Economic Growth. Scottish Journal of Political Economy. 2008; 55(5):654-682. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.2008.00470.x

50. Afonso O., Neves P.C., Pinto T. The Non-Observed Economy and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis. Economic Systems. 2020; 44(1). (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100746

51. Doucouliagos H., Laroche P. Unions and Profits: A Meta‐Regression Analysis. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society. 2009; 48(1):146-184. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2008.00549.x

52. Schneider F., Klinglmair R. Shadow Economies Around the World: What Do We Know? Working Paper No. 1167. 2004. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=518526 (accessed 12.05.2021). (In Eng.)

53. Pickhardt M., Sardà Pons J. Size and Scope of the Underground Economy in Germany. Applied Economics. 2006; 38(14):1707-1713. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500426868

54. Schneider F., Buehn A., Montenegro C.E. New Estimates for the Shadow Economies All over the World. International Economic Journal. 2010; 24(4):443-461. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2010.525974

55. Buehn A. The Shadow Economy in German Regions: An Empirical Assessment. German Economic Review. 2012; 13(3):275-290. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00557.x

56. Buehn A., Schneider F. Corruption and the Shadow Economy: Like Oil and Vinegar, Like Water and Fire? International Tax and Public Finance. 2012; 19:172-194. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9175-y

57. Asfuroglu D., Elgin C. Growth Effects of Inflation under the Presence of Informality. Bulletin of Economic Research. 2016; 68(4):311-328. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12057

58. Bologna J. Contagious Corruption, Informal Employment, and Income: Evidence from Brazilian Municipalities. The Annals of Regional Science. 2017; 58:67-118. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0786-1

59. Lapin A.P., Druzhkov A.M. Usage of Weighted Least Squares Method Conversion Functions for Vortex Sonic Flowmeters Research. Vestnik YUUrGU. Seriya “Kompyuternye tekhnologii, upravlenie, radioehlektronika” = Bulletin of the South Ural State University Series “Computer Technologies, Automatic Control, Radio Electronics”. 2013; 13(2):109-113. Available at: https://dspace.susu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/handle/0001.74/4653/13.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed 10.04.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

60. Volchenko O.V., Shirokanova A.A. Applying Multilevel Regression Modeling to Cross-National Data (On the Example of Generalized Trust). Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie = Sociology: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Modeling. 2016; (43):7-62. Available at: https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/soc4m/article/view/5264 (accessed 08.05.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

61. Ugura M., Trushinb E., Solomona E., Guidia F. R&D and Productivity in OECD Firms and Industries: A Hierarchical Meta-Regression Analysis. Research Policy. 2016; 45(10):2069-2086. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.08.001

62. Korobkova N.A., Patturi Y.V. Self-Employed Taxation: Russian Realities and Prospects. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. 2019; 18(1):203-210. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.05.24

63. Bruce D. Effects of the United States Tax System on Transitions into Self-Employment. Labour Economics. 2000; 7(5):545-574. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(00)00013-0

64. Jansen G. Solo Self-Employment and Membership of Interest Organizations in the Netherlands: Economic, Social, and Political Determinants. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2020; 41(3):512-539. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X17723712

65. Agut García C., Núñez González C. The Regulation of Economically Dependent Self-Employed Work in Spain: A Critical Analysis and a Comparison with Italy. E-Journal of International and Comparative. Labour Studies. 2012; 1(1-2). Available at: http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/handle/10234/191063 (accessed 13.03.2021). (In Eng.)

66. Todolí-Signes A. The ‘Gig Economy’: Employee, Self-Employed or the Need for a Special Employment Regulation? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research. 2017; 23(2):193-205. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701381

Submitted 24.08.2021; approved after reviewing 27.09.2021; accepted for publication 05.10.2021.

About the authors:

Galina A. Reznik, Head of the Department of Marketing and Economic Theory, Penza State University of Architecture and Construction (28 Titova St., Penza 440028, Russian Federation), Dr. Sci. (Economics), Full Professor, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4575-1812, reznikga@gmail.com

Natalia A. Korobkova, Associate Professor, Department of Marketing and Economic Theory, Penza State University of Architecture and Construction (28 Titova St., Penza 440028, Russian Federation), Cand. Sci. (Economics), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2682-1504, korobkova-natalia@mail.ru

Contribution of the authors:

G. A. Reznik – statement of the research problem; academic supervision; formulation of the basic concept of the study; evaluation of the results; drawing conclusions; critical analysis and revision of the text of the article.

N. A. Korobkova – preparation of the text of the article, literature review on the issue under study, graphical representation of the research results; drawing conclusions; putting forward recommendations.

The authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

To download article