T. S. Soloveva. Regions of the North-West of Russia: Analysis of the Conditions for the Implementation of Social Innovation

UDК 332.14:001.895 

DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.117.029.202104.768-793

Abstract

Introduction. International experience shows that social innovation is an important tool for regional development, although this type of innovation is a relatively new phenomenon for Russia. On the basis of the research conducted, the article analyzes the conditions for the implementation of social innovation which has a significant potential to meet the challenges of territorial development.

Materials and Methods. Based on materials from open sources, as well as on an expert survey conducted by the Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences with the direct participation of the author, the conditions for the implementation of social innovation prevailing in the constituent entities of the Northwestern Federal District of the Russian Federation were analyzed in the context of legal, infrastructural, economic, and socio-cultural components. Using the results of the expert survey, a quantitative assessment of the level of development of the conditions for the implementation of social innovation was given. The main barriers preventing the reproduction of social innovation within the territory under consideration were revealed.

Results. The study has revealed that in the regions of the Northwestern Federal District the conditions for the implementation of social innovation are at the stage of active development: infrastructure and legislation are being formed; financial, tax and property support is being provided; educational programs are being implemented. The study has also shown that there are a number of problematic aspects associated with the underdevelopment of the regulatory framework, with the lack of Centers for innovation in the social sphere in a number of constituent entities, with the limited availability of some financial instruments, with low social and innovative activity of people, etc.

Discussion and Conclusion. The results obtained are supported by other studies, which substantiates the need for policy adjustment towards improving the relevant regulatory framework, economic conditions, infrastructure, and socio-cultural environment. The research materials can be used by regional authorities when making managerial decisions to support social innovation; they can also be useful for further studies within the framework of the issues under consideration.

Keywords: region, social innovation, regulatory framework, economic environment, infrastructure, socio-cultural conditions

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

For citation: Soloveva T.S. Regions of the North-West of Russia: Analysis of the Conditions for the Implementation of Social Innovation. Regionology = Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2021; 29(4):768-793. doi: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.117.029.202104.768-793

REFERENCES

1. Gorodetsky A. Failures of the State and Dysfunctions of State Administration. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya = Issues of Management Theory and Practice. 2017; (3):6-18. Available at: https://ptpmag.ru/provaly-gosudarstva-i-disfunkcii-gosudarstvennogo-upravlenija/ (accessed 30.05.2021). (In Russ.)

2. Aoyama Y., Parthasarathy B. When Both the State and Market Fail: Inclusive Development and Social Innovation in India. Area Development and Policy. 2018; 3(3):330-348. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2018.1481759

3. Phills J.A., Deiglmeier K., Miller D.T. Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. 2008; 6(4):34-43. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242511521_Rediscovering_Social_Innovation (accessed 30.05.2021). (In Eng.)

4. Nyseth T., Hamdouch A. The Transformative Power of Social Innovation in Urban Planning and Local Development. Urban Planning. 2019; 4(1):1-6. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i1.1950

5. Repo P., Matschoss K. Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenge. Sustainability. 2020; 12(1). (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010319

6. Ziegler R., Molnár G., Chiappero-Martinetti E., Von Jacobi N. Creating (Economic) Space for Social Innovation. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. 2017; 18(2):293-298. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2017.1301897

7. Kaletka C., Markmann M., Pelka B. Peeling the Onion. An Exploration of the Layers of Social Innovation Ecosystems. Modelling a Context Sensitive Perspective on Driving and Hindering Factors for Social Innovation. European Public & Social Innovation Review. 2017; 1(2):83-93. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.16-2.3

8. Popov E.V., Veretennikova A.Yu., Omonov Zh.K. Institutional Mechanism for Shaping Social Innovation. Ehkonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2016; (5):57-75. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2016.5.47.3

9. Popov E.V., Veretennikova A.Yu., Omonov Zh.K. Institutional Atlas of Social Innovations. Ehkonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = Economic Revival of Russia. 2017; (2):80-96. Available at: https://e-v-r.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2017-2-52.pdf (accessed 30.05.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

10. Popov E.V., Omonov J.K., Naumov I.V., Veretennikova A.Y. Trends in the Development of Social Innovation. Теrrа Economicus. 2018; 16(3):35-59. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.23683/2073-6606-2018-16-3-35-59

11. Kuznetsova Yu.A. Social Innovation in the Russian Federation: Institutional and Informational Aspects (A Monograph). Novokuznetsk; 2020. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.18411/kuznecova-monogr-socialinnovation-2020

12. Avtonomov A.S. Volunteering is a Factor of the Civil Society Development and Social Innovation. Kontury globalnykh transformatsij: politika, ehkonomika, pravo = Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. 2014; 7(6):92-109. Available at: https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/135 (accessed 30.05.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

13. Krasnopolskaya I., Mersiyanova I. Civil Society as an Environment for Production and Diffusion of Social Innovation. Foresight-Russia. 2014; 8(4):40-53. Available at: https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/en/2014-8-4/140154236.html (accessed 30.05.2021). (In Eng.)

14. Westley F., Antadze N. Making a Difference: Strategies for Scaling Social Innovation for Greater Impact. Innovation Journal. 2010; 15(2):1-19. Available at: https://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/2010_15_2_2_westley-antadze_social-innovate.pdf (accessed 30.05.2021). (In Eng.)

15. Yakimets V.N., Nikovskaya L.I. Support of Social Entrepreneurship: Evaluation of Mechanisms and Rating of Russian Regions. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. 2019; (5):99-109. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250004962-1

16. Kulkova V.Yu. Implementation of State Support for Social Entrepreneurship in the Development of Social Services in the Regions of the Russian Federation. Voprosy upravleniya = Management Issues. 2021; (2):90-101. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2021-2-90-101

17. Borodina A.V., Vasilieva E.N., Lavrenyuk N.M., Poltavskaya M.B. Intellectual Social Entrepreneurship: Prospects for the Formation of the Ecosystem. Logos et Praxis. 2020; 19(4):62-77. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2020.4.6

18. Ivanova M.M., Borodkina O.I. Development of the Ecosystem of Social Entrepreneurship in the Northwestern region of Russia. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya = Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology. 2020; (4):622-636. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-4-622-636

19. Kulkova V.Yu. Support Infrastructure for Social Entrepreneurship in Russia. Natsionalnye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost = National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2017; 13(9):1592-1607. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.13.9.1592

20. Popov E.V., Veretennikova A.Y., Naumov I.V., Kozinskaya K.M. Non-Formal Institutional Environment of Social Entrepreneurship. Ehkonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2018; 11(4):217-234. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2018.4.58.14

21. Blagov Yu.E., Aray Yu.N. Educational Programs in Social Entrepreneurship: International Experience and Russian Features. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 8: Menedzhment = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management. 2014; (3):177-197. Available at: http://www.vestnikmanagement.spbu.ru/archive/pdf/625.pdf (accessed 30.05.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

22. Popov E.V., Veretennikova A.Yu., Kozinskaya K.M. Financial Tools to Develop Social Entrepreneurship. Ehkonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2019; 12(5):91-108. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2019.5.65.6

23. Barkov A.V., Grishina Ya.S. A Critical Analysis of the Russian Law-Making Approach to Legalization of Social Entrepreneurship. Grazhdanskoe pravo = Civil Law. 2019; (2):3-6. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2019-2-3-5

24. Soloveva T.S. Theoretical Issues of Social Innovation Ecosystems-Building and Development. Vestnik NGIEHI = Bulletin NGIEI. 2019; (3):84-93. Available at: http://vestnik.ngiei.ru/?page_id=1709 (accessed 30.05.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

25. Terstriep J., Rehfeld D., Kleverbeck M. Favourable Social Innovation Ecosystem(s)? – An Explorative Approach. European Planning Studies. 2020; 28(5):881-905. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1708868

26. Aisenberg L., Heikkilä S., Noya A., Santos F. Boosting Social Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprise Development in the Netherlands. OECD Working Paper. 2019; 1:1-79. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/4e8501b8-en

27. Hulgård L., Chodorkoff L.M. Social Enterprises and their Ecosystems in Europe: Country report, Denmark. Brussels: European Commission; 2019. (In Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.2767/78

28. Ramos N.S. Evaluation of a Social Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: The Case of Bogotá. Thesis for: MSc in Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh; 2018. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330486453_EVALUATION_OF_A_SOCIAL_ENTREPRENEURIAL_ECOSYSTEM_The_Case_of_Bogota (accessed 30.05.2021). (In Eng.).

29. Soloveva T.S., Popov A.V. Assessment of Intersectoral Coordination in the Development of Social Innovation at the Regional Level. Sotsialnoe prostranstvo = Social Area. 2019; (4). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15838/sa.2019.4.21.2

30. Soloveva Т.S. Developing Ecosystems of Social Innovation in the Context of Creating Regional Innovative Subsystems. Regionalnaya ehkonomika. Yug Rossii = Regional Economy. South of Russia. 2019; 7(3):42-50. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2019.3.5

31. Petrovskaya Yu.A., Klochkova K.A. Social Entrepreneurship as a Subject of Social Services within Innovative Development of the Russian Society (Case Study of the Republic of Karelia). Region: ehkonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology. 2019; (3):195-215. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20190308

32. Ustinova K.A. Public Participation in Social Practices: Incentives and Barriers. Problemy razvitiya territorii = Problems of Territory’s Development. 2019; (6):102-119. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2019.6.104.7

33. Smirnov V. Regional Systems of Social Entrepreneurship in Russia: Typology, Development Factors and Key Contradictions. Zhurnal issledovanij sotsialnoj politiki = The Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2021; 19(1):23-40. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2021-19-1-23-40

Submitted 17.06.2021; approved after reviewing 20.07.2021; accepted for publication 29.07.2021.

About the author:

Tatiana S. Soloveva, Researcher, Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (56a Gorky St., Vologda 160014, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1770-7566, solo_86@list.ru

The author has read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

To download article