V. V. Karginova-Gubinova. The Influence of Stakeholders on the Environmental Investment of Companies in the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation

UDК 338.26(470+571)

doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.120.030.202203.533-554

Abstract

Introduction. The need to transition towards sustainable development of companies in the Arctic regions of Russia and their low level of investment in environmental protection make it relevant to study the factors determining the volume of environmental investment. The purpose of the study has been to analyze the impact of certain groups of financial stakeholders on the level of environmental investments of the company.

Materials and Methods. The methodology of the work is based on the theory of stakeholders. The indicators of investment activity of companies in the north-western Arctic regions of Russia were considered, methods of descriptive statistics were used, hierarchical cluster and discriminant analyses were carried out.

Results. The results of the study showed that the companies of the studied territory are characterized by a low volume of environmental investments, but it is higher than the national average. The direction and strength of the influence of individual stakeholders on investing in environmental protection is differentiated by environmental areas. At the same time, all the identified groups of stakeholders have a positive, albeit different, impact on the level of investment in environmental protection in all areas in the aggregate. To the greatest extent, the current volume of environmental investments is because of the interests of corporate creditors and federal authorities, to the least – owners, especially foreign ones.

Discussion and Conclusion. Considering the results obtained, recommendations are given to increase the current level of environmental investment activity of companies. The theoretical significance of the work is determined by clarifying the theory of stakeholders and the concept of green finance. The practical significance lies in obtaining possibility to develop targeted measures to support interested investors and increase the orientation of other persons to environmental protection.

Keywords: environmental investments, environmental protection, corporate environmental responsibility, stakeholder theory, financial stakeholders, Arkhangelsk Region, Republic of Karelia, Komi Republic, Murmansk Region, North-Western Federal District

Conflict of interests. The author declares that there is not conflict of interest.

Funding. This article was prepared as part of the state assignment by the Karelian Research Centre of the RAS “Comprehensive research and development of the fundamentals of sustainable development management of the northern and border zones of Russia in global challenges”.

For citation: Karginova-Gubinova V.V. The Influence of Stakeholders on the Environmental Investment of Companies in the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation. Regionology. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2022;30(3):533–554. doi: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.120.030.202203.533-554

REFERENCES

1. Cadez S., Czerny A., Letmathe P. Stakeholder Pressures and Corporate Climate Change Mitigation Strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2019;28(1):1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2070

2. Chowdhury M.M.H., Paul S.K., Sianaki O.A., Quaddus M.A. Dynamic Sustainability Requirements of Stakeholders and the Supply Portfolio. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;255:1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120148

3. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour A.B., Vazquez-Brust D.A., Chiappetta Jabbour C.J., Ribeiro D.A. The Interplay between Stakeholders, Resources and Capabilities in Climate Change Strategy: Converting Barriers into Cooperation. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020;29(3):1362–1386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2438

4. Karginova-Gubinova V.V. Causal Relationship between Environmental and Financial Indicators of Russian Industrial Companies. World of Economics and Management. 2021;21(3):70–88. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2021-21-3-70-88

5. De Haan M., Dam L., Scholtens B. The Drivers of the Relationship between Corporate Environmental Performance and Stock Market Returns. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2012;2(3-4):338–375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2012.738601

6. Liu Z. Unraveling the Complex Relationship between Environmental and Financial Performance – A Multilevel Longitudinal Analysis. International Journal of Production Economics. 2020;219:328–340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.005

7. Molchanova T.K., Yashalova N.N., Ruban D.A. Environmental Concerns of Russian Businesses: Top Company Missions and Climate Change Agenda. Climate. 2020;8(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8040056

8. Agarkov S., Motina T., Matviishin D. The Environmental Impactcaused by Developing Energy Resources in the Arctic Region. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2018;180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/180/1/012007

9. Samarina V.P., Skufina T.P., Savon D.Y., Shinkevich A.I. Management of Externalities in the Context of Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic Zone. Sustainability. 2021;13(14). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147749

10. Fang Х., Junqing L. Do Commercial Banks Incorporate the Environmental Risk in Loan Pricing Decision? Evidence from the Environmental Responsibility Score. Journal of Finance and Economics. 2019;45(11):57–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2019.11.005

11. Kim Y., Statman M. Do Corporations Invest Enough in Environmental Responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics. 2012;105(1):115–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0954-2

12. David P., Bloom M., Hillman A. Investor Activism, Managerial Responsiveness, and Corporate Social Performance. Strategic Management Journal. 2007;28(1):91–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.571

13. Neubaum D.O., Zahra S.A. Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Performance: The Moderating Effects of Investment Horizon, Activism and Coordination. Journal of Management. 2006;32(1):108–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277797

14. Nguyen V.H., Choi B., Agbola F.W. Corporate Social Responsibility and Debt Maturity: Australian Evidence. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2020;62(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101374

15. O’Rourke A. A New Politics of Engagement: Shareholder Activism for Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2003;12(4):227–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.364

16. Husted B.W., de Sousa-Filho J.M. The Impact of Sustainability Governance, Country Stakeholder Orientation, and Country Risk on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;155(2):93–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.025

17. Southwood P. Shareholder Engagement: Prospects for Improving Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Business Performance Management. 2003;5(2/3):223–236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2003.003252

18. Hess D. Public Pensions and the Promise of Shareholder Activism for the Next Frontier of Corporate Governance: Sustainable Economic Development. Virginia Law & Business Review. 2007;2(2):221–263. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.988792

19. Chen H.-Y., Yang S.S. Do Investors Exaggerate Corporate ESG Information? Evidence of the ESG Momentum Effect in the Taiwanese Market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2020;63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101407

20. Park S.R., Jang J.Y. The Impact of ESG Management on Investment Decision: Institutional Investors’ Perceptions of Country-Specific ESG Criteria. International Journal of Financial Studies. 2021;9(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs9030048

21. Marshall R.S., Akoorie M.E.M., Hamann R., Sinha P. Environmental Practices in the Wine Industry: An Empirical Application of the Theory of Reasoned Action and Stakeholder Theory in the United States and New Zealand. Journal of World Business. 2010;45(4):405–414. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.009

22. Van der Laan Smith J., Adhikari A., Tondkar R.H. Exploring Differences in Social Disclosures Internationally: A Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 2005;24(2):123–151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.12.007

23. Alon I., Lattemann C., Fetscherin M., et al. Usage of Public Corporate Communications of Social Responsibility in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC). International Journal of Emerging Markets. 2010;5(1):6–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17468801011018248

24. Polemis M.L., Spais A. Disentangling the Drivers of Renewable Energy Investments: The Role of Behavioral Factors. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020;29(6):2170–2180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2493

25. Wielewska I. The Importance of Economic Instruments in the Process of Implementing Ecological Investments in Agribusiness Companies. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference “Economic Science for Rural Development”. 2018. p. 368–376. doi: https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2018.043

26. West J., Bailey I., Winter M. Renewable Energy Policy and Public Perceptions of Renewable Energy: A Cultural Theory Approach. Energy Policy. 2010;38(10):5739–5748. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.024

27. Juholin E. For Business or the Good of All? A Finnish Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Governance. 2004;4(3):20–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700410547477

28. Banerjee S.B., Iyer E.S., Kashyap R.K. Corporate Environmentalism: Antecedents and Influence of Industry Type. Journal of Marketing. 2003;67(2):106–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.106.18604

29. Gangi F., D’Angelo E., Daniele L.M., Varrone N. Assessing the Impact of Socially Responsible Human Resources Management on Company Environmental Performance and Cost of Debt. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2021;28(5):1511–1527. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2179

30. Walls J.L., Berrone P., Phan P.H. Corporate Governance and Environmental Performance: Is There Really a Link? Strategic Management Journal. 2012;33(8):885–913. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1952

31. Wei F., Ding B., Kong Y. Female Directors and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the Environmental Investment of Chinese Listed Companies. Sustainability. 2017;9(12). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122292

32. Murillo-Luna J.L., Garcés-Ayerbe C., Rivera-Torres P. Why Do Patterns of Environmental Response Differ? A Stakeholders’ Pressure Approach. Strategic Management Journal. 2008;29(11):1225–1240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.711

33. Henriques I., Sharma S. Pathways of Stakeholder Influence in the Canadian Forest Industry. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2005;14(6):384–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.456

34. Fifka M.S., Pobizhan M. An Institutional Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility in Russia. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014;82:192–201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.091

35. Scotty J., Rodgers P. Sustainable Development in the Russia Federation: The Limits of Greening within Industrial Firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2012;19(3):178–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.263

36. Sparkes R., Cowton C.J. The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. 2004;52:45–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033106.43260.99

37. Huang H., Wu D., Gaya J. Chinese Shareholders’ Reaction to the Disclosure of Environmental Violations: A CSR Perspective. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. 2017;2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-017-0022-z

38. Chan M.C., Watson J., Woodliff D. Corporate Governance Quality and CSR Disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics. 2014;125:59–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1887-8

39. Chen S., Wang Y., Albitar K., Huang Z. Does Ownership Concentration Affect Corporate Environmental Responsibility Engagement? The Mediating Role of Corporate Leverage. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2021;21(1):S13–S24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.001

40. Punzo G., Panarello D., Pagliuca M.M., et al. Assessing the Role of Perceived Values and Felt Responsibility on Pro-Environmental Behaviours: A Comparison Across four EU Countries. Environmental Science & Policy. 2019;101:311–322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.006

41. Sargisson R.J., De Groot J.I.M., Steg L. The Relationship between Sociodemographics and Environmental Values Across Seven European Countries. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02253

42. Attig N., Boubakri N., El Ghoul S., Guedhami O. Firm Internationalization and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. 2016;134:171–197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2410-6

43. Khalid F., Sun J., Huang G., Su C.-Y. Environmental, Social and Governance Performance of Chinese Multinationals: A Comparison of State- and Non-State-Owned Enterprises. Sustainability. 2021;13(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074020

44. Symeou P.C., Zyglidopoulos S., Williamson P. Internationalization as a Driver of the Corporate Social Performance of Extractive Industry Firms. Journal of World Business. 2018;53(1):27–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.07.004

45. Christmann P. Multinational Companies and the Natural Environment: Determinants of Global Environmental Policy. Academy of Management Journal. 2004;47(5):747–760. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/20159616

46. Dowell G., Hart S., Yeung B. Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value? Management Science. 2000;46(8):1059–1074. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.8.1059.12030

47. Park S.-B. Multinationals and Sustainable Development: Does Internationalization Develop Corporate Sustainability of Emerging Market Multinationals? Business Strategy and the Environment. 2018;27(8):1514–1524. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2209

48. Erragragui E. Do Creditors Price Firms’ Environmental, Social and Governance Risks? Research in International Business and Finance. 2018;45:197–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.151

49. Ryszawska B., Zabawa J. The Environmental Responsibility of the World’s Largest Banks. Economics & Business. 2018;32(1):51–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/eb-2018-0004

50. Hassan Al-Tamimi H.A. Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of UAE Banks. Global Journal of Business Research. 2014;8(3):91–108. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2260298

51. Fernández-Cuesta C., Castro P., Tascón M.T., Castaño F.J. The Effect of Environmental Performance on Financial Debt. European Evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;207:379–390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.239

52. Gong G., Huang X., Wu S., Tian H., Li W. Punishment by Securities Regulators, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Cost of Debt. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021;171:337–356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04438-z

53. Yang W., Li L. Energy Efficiency, Ownership Structure, and Sustainable Development: Evidence from China. Sustainability. 2017;9(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060912

54. Huang L., Lei Z. How Environmental Regulation Affect Corporate Green Investment: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123560

55. Yadava R.N., Sinha B. Scoring Sustainability Reports Using GRI 2011 Guidelines for Assessing Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Leading Public and Private Indian Companies. Journal of Business Ethics. 2016;138:549–558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2597-1

56. Clark G., Hebb T. Pension Fund Corporate Engagement. The Fifth Stage of Capitalism. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations. 2004;59(1):142–171. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23077578 (accessed 15.12.2021).

Submitted 16.12.2021; approved after reviewing 20.01.2022; accepted for publication 28.01.2022.

About the author:

Valentina V. Karginova-Gubinova, Researcher, Department of Regional Economic Policy, Institute of Economics, Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences (50 A. Nevsky Ave., Petrozavodsk 185030, Russian Federation), Cand. Sci. (Economics), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8630-3621, Researcher ID: H-9921-2018, Scopus ID: 57212378063, vkarginowa@yandex.ru

The author has read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

To download article