N. M. Velikaya, G. V. Tartygasheva, O. P. Novozhenina. Ideas about the Geopolitical Future of Russia as a Factor of Russian Society Consolidation

UDК 321(470+571)

doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.123.031.202302.275-293

Abstract

Introduction. The problems of preserving the sovereignty, national identity, territorial and cultural integrity of Russia have become now particularly relevant in the framework of the global confrontation with the West, and have become important factors in the consolidation of Russian society. The purpose of the article is to assess the role of civil society and the expert community’s views on the geopolitical future of Russia in the context of preserving the territorial and cultural integrity of the country as a factor of consolidation of Russian society.

Materials and Methods. The empirical basis of the article is the results of the sociological monitoring “How do you live, Russia” (1992–2022) and the data of in-depth interviews of experts obtained as part of the study “Forecasts and alternatives for the development of Russia by the eyes of Russians” (2021), which were conducted with the participation of the authors of the article. The sociological monitoring survey allowed to study the dynamics of citizens’ perceptions of the geopolitical future of the Russian Federation and to trace the connection of the main trends with the indicators of consolidation of society included in the toolkit. In-depth interviews were aimed at identifying the dominant points of the expert community’s view that determine the direction of public discourse.

Results. The preservation of the integrity of the Russian Federation and its sovereignty in the long term does not cause doubts among experts or the population, even in the conditions of a crisis and uncertain future associated with the formation of a multipolar world. Optimistic scenarios are considered, emphasizing the strengthening of Russia’s role in the new world order, and pessimistic ones, reflecting isolation models of development.

Discussion and Conclusion. Although the multinational composition of Russia and the federal structure can be interpreted as a potential threat to the internal destabilization of the country, a favorable trend in the field of interethnic and interfaith relations in Russia has been observed since 2016. Both the population and the majority of experts are optimistic about the prospects of interethnic and interregional relations against the background of the emerging civil identity. They predict Russia’s powerful progressive development in the future, using as arguments ideologems about Russia’s special path, as well as the achievements of the state in solving social problems and their own hopes.

Keywords: social and political consolidation, image of the future, federation, regions, interethnic relations, territorial and cultural integrity, external threats

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

For citation: Velikaya N.M., Tartygasheva G.V., Novozhenina O.P. Ideas about the Geopolitical Future of Russia as a Factor of Russian Society Consolidation. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2023;31(2):275–293. doi: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.123.031.202302.275-293

REFERENCES

1. Ray L. State and Civil Society: Civil Society and the Public Sphere. In: Nash K., Scott A., editors. The Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology. Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. p. 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696071.ch20

2. Van Rensburg A.J. The Political Economy of Mental Illness in South Africa. London: Routledge; 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429201455

3. Black A. Guild and State: European Political Thought from the Twelfth Century to the Present. New York: Routledge; 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203790373

4. Przeworski A. A Conceptual History of Political Regimes: Democracy, Dictatorship, and Authoritarianism. In: Wiatr J.J., editor. New Authoritarianism: Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Verlag Barbara Budrich; 2019. p. 17–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdf08xx.5

5. Guasti P. Swerving Towards Deconsolidation? Democratic Consolidation and Civil Society in the Czech Republic. In: Lorenz A., Formánková H., editors. Czech Democracy in Crisis. Springer; 2020. p. 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40006-4_3

6. Nikovskaya L.I. [On the Problem of Formation of Consolidation of the Russian Society: the View of a Conflictologist]. Local Law. 2022;(3):45–50. Available at: http://www.mestnoepravo.com/docs/2022-03-006.pdf (accessed 09.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

7. Lotarev K.A. Possibility and Prospects of Conservatism in the Process of Consolidation of Russian Society. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2016;(2):101–111. Available at: https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/3784 (accessed 09.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

8. Sosnin V.A. Social-Political and Spiritual-Moral Consolidation of Russia: Problem of Cosmopolitism and Security of Russia in Contemporal World. Science. Culture. Society. 2015;(3):42–56. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: QGUPSA

9. Gronskii A.D. [The Russian World in Search of Content]. Russia in Global Affairs. 2017;15(4):186–201. Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/russkij-mir-v-poiskah-soderzhaniya (accessed 09.12.2022). (In Russ.)

10. Shchegolkova E.Yu. Interethnic Relations in the Assessments of Russians: A Sociological Analysis. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2020;(4):499–520. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.4.1260

11. Lapkin V.V. Nation vs Empire in the Modern World Order. Polis. Political Studies. 2018;(4):37-55. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.04.04

12. Borgen Ch.J. From Kosovo to Catalonia: Separatism and Integration in Europe. Goettingen Journal of International Law. 2010;2(3):997–1033. Available at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/faculty_publications/114/ (accessed 09.12.2022).

13. Sakwa R. External Actors in EU-Russia Relations: Between Norms and Space. In: Nitoiu C. Avoiding a New Cold War. The Future of EU-Russia Relations in the Context of the Ukraine Crisis. LSE IDEAS Special Report, 2016. p. 86–93. Available at: https://www.stiftung-mercator.de/content/uploads/2020/12/LSE-IDEAS-Avoiding-a-New-Cold-War.pdf (accessed 09.12.2022).

14. Paikin Z., Korosteleva E. Russia between East and West, and the Future of Eurasian Order. International Politics. 2020;58:321–333. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00261-5

15. Laruelle M. When Eurasia Looks East: Is Eurasianism Sinophile or Sinophobe? In: Bassin M., Pozo G., editors. The Politics of Eurasianism: Identity, Popular Culture and Russia’s Foreign Policy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2017. p. 145–160. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343896810_When_eurasia_looks_east_Is_Eurasianism_Sinophile_or_Sinophobe (accessed 09.12.2022).

16. Mileski Т. Identifying the New Eurasian Prientation in Modern Russian Geopolitical Thought // Eastern Journal of European Studies. 2015;6(2):177–187. Available at: https://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2015_0602_MIL.pdf (accessed 09.12.2022).

17. Zheltikova I.V. [Polak’s Concept “The Image of the Future”]. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem. 2013;(3). (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2013-3-11

18. Vasiliev M.V. Russian World and the Problems of Post-Soviet Space Integration. Archont. 2021;(3):42–44. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: XDWDCO

19. Gonchar O.N. The Great Russian People as the Russian National Idea. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic Sciences. 2020;5(2):139–155. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2020-5-2-139-155

20. Mironova M.N., Kholina V.N. Regional Disparities in Russia: Dynamics in the Post-Soviet Period. RUDN Journal of Economics. 2011;(4):23–34. Available at: https://repository.rudn.ru/ru/records/article/record/63822/ (accessed 10.10.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

21. Akhmeduev A.Sh. Problems of Excessive Polarization of the Level of Social-Economic Development of the Regions of Russia and Imperatives of Modernization of the State Regional Policy. Regional’nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki. 2017;(6):37–51. Available at: http://www.rppe.ru/new/index.php/rppe/article/view/589/513 (accessed 09.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

22. Zonova T.V., Giannotti A. Russia and the West: Contradictory Dialogue. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2020;13(1):23–38. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-1-70-23-38

23. Levashov V.K. Socio-Political Stability: Risks and Imperatives. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2013;(4):29–42. Available at: https://monitoringjournal.ru/index.php/monitoring/article/view/1527/1295 (accessed 09.12.2022). (In Russ.)

Submitted 13.12.2022; revised 31.01.2023; accepted 09.02.2023.

About the authors:

Natalia M. Velikaya, Dr. Sci. (Polit.), Professor, Deputy Director of Science and Research, Institute of Socio-Political Research of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (6, Bld. 1, Fotieva St., Moscow 119333, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5532-844X, Researcher ID: A-9577-2017, Scopus ID: 8438345700, natalivelikaya@gmail.com

Galina V. Tartygasheva, Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and History of Sociology, Russian State University for the Humanities (6 Miusscay Sq., Moscow 125047, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4553-8819, Researcher ID: B-1615-2017, Scopus ID: 56626089300, tarty@yandex.ru

Olga P. Novozhenina, Senior Researcher, Institute of Socio-Political Research of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (6, Bld. 1, Fotieva St., Moscow 119333, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3511-0384, Researcher ID: R-5132-2019, Scopus ID: 57192301345, olganov@yandex.ru

Contribution of the authors:

N. M. Velikaya – defining the research problem; scientific management of research and selection of research methods; critical analysis and revision of the text.

G. V. Tartygasheva – conducting and interpreting in-depth interviews with experts; preparing the text of the publication.

O. P. Novozhenina – preparation, description and visualization of quantitative analysis data; participation in the preparation and design of the text of the publication.

The authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.