M. V. Pevnaya, E. A. Shuklina, T. S. Kienko. Levels of Social Participation among Silver-Age Citizens and Factors of its Activation in the Region of Russia (Case of the Sverdlovsk Region)

doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.128.032.202403.584-601

UDК 323.2(470.1/2)

Abstract

Introduction. The quality of life of silver-age people is associated not only with psychological, economic and physical well-being, but also with the peculiarities of interpersonal relations and the diversity of their social activity. The widespread ideology of active or “delayed aging” actualizes the study of the nature of inclusion of elderly citizens in various practices of social participation that fill their daily lives. The aim of the study is to reveal the level characteristics of social participation of citizens of silver age in the Sverdlovsk Oblast and the factors that determine them.

Materials and Methods. The article analyses the data from the survey of residents of the Sverdlovsk Region over the age of 60, the sample is structured by gender, age, and place of residence of the respondents (type of settlement). The authors’ survey method was used to determine the nature and frequency, level and type of social participation of the Urals elderly, to identify factors that contribute to or impede activity in old age.

Results. The study showed that socio-consumer participation characterized by activities “for oneself” and collective participation aimed at social integration “together with others” constitute the main content of social participation of the studied cohort. The participation of the elderly in the practices aimed at helping and caring (“for others”) is significantly lower, and a radical decrease in the activity of the elderly Urals residents is revealed when they switch to “civic participation”. It has been proved that the intensity of social participation of silver-age citizens living in cities is higher than in rural areas. The only exception is participation in civic activities. The same influence on the intensity of the different practices of social participation at all levels is exerted by the status of residence (independent or in a residential institution), the presence of close relatives and the frequency of Internet use.

Discussion and Conclusion. The identification of the levels and factors of social participation of older citizens creates an evidence base on the processes of active aging in a typical Russian region. The results of the study demonstrate the relevance of focusing regional social policy on aging and the non-profit sector on increasing the social participation of people and groups of the “silver” age. The article may be of interest to regional authorities, social protection and service institutions, the regional non-profit sector, offering tools for the development and implementation of effective social aging policies aimed at implementing resources and supporting the social participation of the older generation.

Keywords: social participation, levels of social participation, inclusive approach, social community, older (silver-age) citizens, Sverdlovsk Region

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation under grant No. 23-28-00134 (https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-28-00134/) at the Southern Federal University.

For citation: Pevnaya M.V., Shuklina E.A., Kienko T.S. Levels of Social Participation among Silver-Age Citizens and Factors of its Activation in the Region of Russia (Case of the Sverdlovsk Region). Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2024;32(3):584–601. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.128.032.202403.584-601

REFERENCES

1. Wu S., Wang R., Zhao Y., Ma X., Wu M., Yan X., He J. The Relationship between Self-Rated Health and Objective Health Status: A Population-Based Study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:320. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-320

2. Katagiri K., Kim J.H. Factors Determining the Social Participation of Older Adults: A Comparison between Japan and Korea Using EASS 2012. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0194703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194703

3. Grigorieva I.A., Parfenova O.A., Galkin K.A. Conference “Extended Adulthood / Delayed Ageing in a Time of Post-COVID and Uncertainty”. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2023;26(1):258‒262. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2023.26.1.10

4. Saraliyeva Z.H. Resource Support for Delayed Aging. Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences. 2023;(4):92‒101. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: http://www.vestnik-soc.unn.ru/ru/nomera?anum=12202 (accessed 01.02.2024).

5. Palmore E.B. Research Note: Ageism in Canada and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology. 2004;19:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCCG.0000015098.62691.ab

6. Palmore E.B. The Ageism Survey: First Findings. The Gerontologist. 2001;41(5):572–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/41.5.572

7. Grigorieva I.A., Kolosova G.V. Social Interactions in Long-Term Care. Advances in Gerontology. 2021;34(6):919–927. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.34922/AE.2021.34.6.014

8. Rogozin D.M. Liberalization of ageing, or labor, knowledge and health in old age. Sociological Journal. 2012;(4):62‒93. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://www.journal-socjournal.ru/index.php/socjour/article/view/19 (accessed 01.02.2024).

9. Alley D.E., Putney N.M., Rice M., Bengtson V.L. The Increasing Use of Theory in Social Gerontology: 1990–2004. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2010;65B(5):583–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbq053

10. Bukov A., Maas I., Lampert T. Social Participation in Very Old Age: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Findings from BASE. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2002;57(6):510–517. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.6.p510

11. Levasseur M., Lussier-Therrien M., Biron M.L., Raymond É., Castonguay J., Naud D., et al. Scoping Study of Definitions of Social Participation: Update and Co-Construction of an Interdisciplinary Consensual Definition. Age and Ageing. 2022;51(2):afab215. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab215

12. Amagasa S., Fukushima N., Kikuchi H., Oka K., Takamiya T., Odagiri Y., Inoue S. Types of Social Participation and Psychological Distress in Japanese Older Adults: A Five-Year Cohort Study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(4):e0175392. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175392

13. Dehi A.M., Mohammadi-Shahboulaghi F. Social Participation of Older Adults: A Concept Analysis. International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery. 2020;8(1):55‒72. https://doi.org/10.30476/IJCBNM.2019.82222.1055

14. Serrat R., Scharf T., Villar F., Gómez C. Fifty-Five Years of Research into Older People’s Civic Participation: Recent Trends, Future Directions. The Gerontologist. 2020;60(1):e38‒e51. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz021

15. Kienko T.S. Social Participation of the Elderly: Approaches to Analysis and Assessment Tools. Russian Sociological Review. 2023;22(2):225‒260. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2023-2-225-260

16. Levasseur M., Richard L., Gauvin L., Raymond E. Inventory and Analysis of Definition of Social Participation Found in the Aging Literature: Proposed Taxonomy of Social Activities. Social Science & Medicine. 2010;71(12):2141‒2149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.041

17. Jones C.A., Jhangri G.S., Yamamoto S.S., Hogan D.B., Hanson H., Levasseur M., et al. Social Participation of Older People in Urban and Rural Areas: Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. BMC Geriatrics. 2023;23:439. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04127-2

18. Berry H.L., Rodgers B., Dear K.B.G. Preliminary Development and Validation of an Australian Community Participation Questionnaire: Types of Participation and Associations with Distress in a Coastal Community. Social Science and Medicine. 2007;64(8):1719‒1737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.12.009

19. Piškur B., Daniëls R., Jongmans M.J., Ketelaar M., Smeets R.J., Norton M., Beurskens A.J. Participation and Social Participation: Are they Distinct Concepts? Clinical Rehabilitation. 2014;28(3):211–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215513499029

20. Vasilyeva E.N., Skobelina N.A., Nikolenko N.A., Dulina N.V. Social Activity of Elderly People in Modern Russia: Gender Aspect. Logos et Praxis. 2018;17(2):44‒47. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://psst.jvolsu.com/index.php/ru/component/attachments/download/1199 (accessed 01.02.2024).

21. Ptitsyna N.A. Computer Literacy Acquisition by the Elderly: Gender Perspective. Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences. 2018;(4):81‒89. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: http://www.vestnik-soc.unn.ru/ru/nomera?anum=10610 (accessed 01.02.2024).

22. Galkin K. Digitalization of Older People’s Volunteering during the Pandemic: Opportunities and Barriers of the Artificial Intelligence. The Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2022;20(3):377‒392. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-3-377-392

23. Parfenova O., Petukhova I. Covid-19 Pandemic Impact on Older People in Urban and Rural Contexts. Sociological Studies. 2022;(5):71‒80. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250018704-7

24. Kosharnaya G.B., Schanina E.V. Deprivation Factors for the Elderly in the Social-labor Sphere: A Regional Aspect. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2019;19(3):481‒493. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-3-481-493

25. Оsmuk L.A., Nezamaeva O.B. Social Activity of Elderly People Living in a Large City: Opportunities and Challenges. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2021;(62):102‒110. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/62/9

26. Grigorieva I.A., Parfenova O.A., Petukhova I.S. Employment and Social Exclusion of Elderly Citizens (Review of the European Conferences). Sociological Studies. 2018;(5):157‒159. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.7868/S013216251805015X

27. Shchanina E.V. Behavioral Practices of Senior Citizens Aimed at Improving Their Well-Being in Contemporary Russia. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2021;(2):138–161. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.2.1702

28. Grishina E.E., Tsatsura E.A. Social Service for the Elderly: What Is Happening and Is Development Possible? The Authority. 2019;27(3):145‒154. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v27i3.6433

29. Grigoryeva I., Parfenova O. The Role of NGOs in the Development of Community Care in Russia. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2021;24(1):79‒104. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: http://jourssa.ru/jourssa/article/view/2321 (accessed 01.02.2024).

30. Nguyen H.H. Social Adaptation of the Elderly to Digital Transformation of Society: The Sociological Research in Hanoi Capital and Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam). Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2023;31(2):375–392. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.123.031.202302.375-392

31. Parfenova O.A. Engaging Older People in Volunteering and Civic Activities As a Tool to Overcome Social Exclusion. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2020;(4):119‒135. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.4.1580

32. Panchenko O.L. Quality of Social Capital of a Region as a Factor in the Development of Civil Society (the Case Study of the Non-Profit Sector). Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2019;27(1):156‒173. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.106.027.201901.156-173

33. Golubeva E., Emelyanova A., Kharkova O., Rautio A., Soloviev A. Caregiving of Older Persons during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Russian Arctic Province: Challenges and Practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(5):2775. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052775

About the authors:

Maria V. Pevnaya, Dr.Sci. (Sociol.), Associate Professor, Head of the Chair of Sociology and Technology of Public Administration, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin (29 Mira St., Yekaterinburg 620062, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3591-1181, Researcher ID: E-4080-2014, Scopus ID: 57200641582, m.v.pevnaya@urfu.ru

Elena A. Shuklina, Dr.Sci. (Sociol.), Professor, Professor of the Chair of Sociology and Technology of Public Administration, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin (29 Mira St., Yekaterinburg 620062, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6478-4332, Researcher ID: E-6113-2014, Scopus ID: 6603641875, e.a.shuklina@urfu.ru

Tatiana S. Kienko, Cand.Sci. (Sociol.), Associate Professor of the Social Technologies Chair, Southern Federal University (105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya St., Rostov-on-Don 344006, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5558-2322, Researcher ID: A-3828-2017, Scopus ID: 57190946503, tskienko@sfedu.ru

Contribution of the authors:

M. V. Pevnaya – collection, processing, systematization and interpretation of the obtained results; study of statistical material; structuring and analysis of the results; preparation of the text of the article.

E. A. Shuklina – conducting a critical analysis of materials; interpretation of the results obtained; preparation of the text of the article.

T. S. Kienko ‒ staging a scientific problem; formulation of the scientific hypothesis of the study; definition of research methodology; critical analysis and revision of the text.

Availability of data and materials. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

The authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 04.04.2024; revised 13.05.2024; accepted 23.05.2024.