I. G. Napalkova, K. V. Kurochkina. Image of the Republic of Mordovia: Impressions, Symbols, Stereotypes

UDК 323.1:659.1(470.345)

DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.113.028.202004.866-887

Introduction. In a competitive environment, the image of a modern region is an instrument of “soft power”, capable of enhancing the effectiveness of the territory's development, provided it is associated with positive impressions. In this regard, analyzing perception of the symbolic component of a region's image by various target groups is of particular importance. The purpose of the study is to reveal the symbols, impressions, stereotypes most prevailing among the respondents that form the image of the Republic of Mordovia, which are the factors in developing the regional identity.

Materials and Methods. The Republic of Mordovia was chosen for a case study: the region’s development is a vivid example of contradictoriness, the Republic being a leader in some indicators (it is among the safest regions of the country, it actively develops the innovative infrastructure, etc.) is a complete outsider in others (in the quality of life and average wages compared to other regions, etc.). Symbolic interactionism, emphasizing communication through symbols the meaning of which is set by the communicants, established the theoretical framework of the study. The method of focused interview provided the applied basis of the research. Discussions were held in 3 groups, formed according to the place of residence of the respondents: “foreigners”, “non-residents”, “residents”.

Results. Unique data on the specific features of the perception of the image of the Republic of Mordovia, promoted by various agencies involved in image-making, have been obtained. The dependence of assessments and emotional attitudes to various symbols on the territorial affiliation of the recipients has been revealed. It has been noted that associations between a number of symbols (fox, octagonal rosette, red color, etc.) and Mordovia are unclear to non-residents, i. e., the mechanism of explanation, fixation and consolidation in the row of “region – symbol” is broken.

Discussion and Conclusion. The authors have come to the conclusion that at present there are no images presenting unambiguously positive stable associations with the Republic of Mordovia, especially among “non-residents” and “foreigners”. The gap between the primary and secondary images is a rather worrying trend is, which can lead to dissonance, negative emotional response and negative assessments of the territory. The results of the study may be used to adjust the image-making policy of a region: to emphasize strengths and level weaknesses.

Keywords: image, impression, symbol, logo, broadcast, accentuation, association, identity, territory, region, Republic of Mordovia

Funding. The study was conducted with the financial support from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Government of the Republic of Mordovia as part of the project “Modern Region in the Focus of Political Imageology (the Case of the Republic of Mordovia)” (No. 18-411-130012 r_a).

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

For citation: Napalkova I.G., Kurochkina K.V. Image of the Republic of Mordovia: Impressions, Symbols, Stereotypes. Regionology = Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2020; 28(4):866-887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.113.028.202004.866-887

REFERENCES

1. Napalkova I.G., Kurochkina K.V. The Region Image: Specifics, Basic Elements and Technologies of Formation. Ehkonomicheskaya istoriya = Russian Journal of Economic History. 2018; 14(4):414-429. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2409-630X.043.014.201804.414-429

2. Rojas López J.J. The Symbolic Appropriated Territory, an Updated Tradition in the New Cultural Geography. Revista Geografica Venezolana = Venezuelan Geographical Journal. 2018; 59(2):434-447. Available at: https://www.redalyc.org/jatsRepo/3477/347760473010/html/index.html (accessed 03.08.2020). (In Spanish)

3. Wäckerlin N., Hoppe T., Warnier M., de Jong W.M. Comparing City Image and Brand Identity in Polycentric Regions Using Network Analysis. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. 2020; 16:80-96. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-019-00128-4

4. Doyle J. Reconceptualising Research Impact: Reflections on the Real-World Impact of Research in an Australian Context. Higher Education Research and Development. 2018; 37(7):1366-1379. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1504005

5. Jiménez-Tovar S., Lavička M. Folklorized Politics: How Chinese Soft Power Works in Central Asia. Asian Ethnicity. 2020; 21(2):244-268. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2019.1610355

6. Sohn C., Scott J.W. Ghost in the Genevan Borderscape! On the Symbolic Significance of an “Invisible” Border. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2020; 45(1):18-32. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12313

7. Rachmiatie A., Ravena D., Yuniati Y. The Order of Broadcasting Regulation in Regulating the Implementation of Broadcasting Media (Television and Radio) in Establishing Local Identity and Culture. International Journal of Business and Society. 2020; 21(S1):1-18. Available at: http://www.ijbs.unimas.my/index.php/content-abstract/current-issue/643-t... (accessed 03.08.2020). (In Eng.)

8. Xu J. Colour in Urban Places: A case Study of Leicester City Football Club Blue. Color Research and Application. 2019; 44(4):613-621. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22378

9 Debies-Car J.S. Beyond the Local: Places, People, and Brands in New England Beer Marketing. Journal of Cultural Geography. 2019; 36(1):78-110. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2018.1511104

10. Danilova O.N., Zaytseva T.A. Visual Symbols as Part of the Image. Territoriya novykh vozmozhnostej. Vestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ehkonomiki i servisa = Тhe Territory of New Opportunities. The Herald of Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service. 2016; 8(1):154-161. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25721399 (accessed 03.08.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

11. Kogai E.A., Komkov K.A. Improvement of Regional Image as Objective for Socio-Cultural Policy. Regionologiya = Regionology. 2011; (2):15-21. Available at: https://regionsar.ru/ru/node/683 (accessed 03.08.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

12. Ryazanova E.V. Symbolic Essence of Image. Istoricheskaya i sotsialno-obrazovatelnaya mysl = Historical and Social-Educational Idea. 2017; 9(2/2):194-199. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2017-9-2/2-194-199

13. Fedotova A.V. Visualization as a Component of the Territory Branding Process. Аrktika: obshhestvo i ehkonomika = The Arctic: Society and Economy. 2015; (14):63-66. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25680948 (accessed 03.08.2020). (In Russ.)

14. Kislitsyna D.O. Cultural Policy in the Kirov Region: Confrontation between Tradition and Innovation. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya = Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science. 2011; (S):34-50. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21357240 (accessed 03.08.2020). (In Russ.)

15. Yunusova A.B., Frolova I.V. Republic of Bashkortostan: Historical, Cultural and Religious Symbols in the Image Strategy of the Republic. Izvestiya Ufimskogo nauchnogo tsentra RАN = Proceedings of the RAS Ufa Scientific Centre. 2017; (1):99-105. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28864993 (accessed 03.08.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

16. Yunusova A.B. Historical Heritage, Ethnic and Religious Diversity in the Image Attractiveness of the Regions of South Urals. Problemy sovremennoj nauki i obrazovaniya = Issues of Modern Science and Education. 2016; (38):34-40. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27537333 (accessed 03.08.2020 (In Russ.)

17. Bogatova O.A., Guseva E.N. Historical Memory and Ethnicity in the Urban Architectural Environment as a Factor of Social Identity Construction in the Capitals of the Russian Federation Republics on the Example of Izhevsk and Saransk. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = Bulletin of Udmurt University. Sociology. Political Science. International Relations. 2019; 3(4):409-429. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.35634/2587-9030-2019-3-4-409-429

18 Desyaev D.G., Napalkova I.G. The Republic of Mordovia: Historical Description of Image Background. Finno-ugorskij mir = Finno-Ugric World. 2019; 11(2):168-182. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.011.2019.02.168-182

19. Napalkova I.G., Kurochkina K.V. Historical and Modern Personality and Image as an Element of Symbolic Ethnonational Capital of the Republic of Mordovia (2014–2019). Finno-ugorskij mir = Finno-Ugric World. 2020; 12(1):42-61. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.012.2020.01.042-061

20. Soldatova A.S., Naplkova I.G., Gryzhankova M.Yu. Perception of Civil Identity Symbols in Russia: (Based on Focus Groups). Gumanitarij: aktualnye problemy gumanitarnoj nauki i obrazovaniya = Russian Journal of the Humanities. 2019; 19(4):464-478. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2078- 9823.048.019.201904.464-478

21. Soldatova A.S., Shirmanov E.V., Smolin A.G. Symbols and Images are Identical (the Example of Republic of Mordovia). Sotsialno-politicheskie nauki = Sociopolitical Sciences. 2016; (3):174-177. Available at: https://urvak.org/articles/sotsia-vypusk-3-simvoly-i-obrazy-identichnost... (accessed 03.08.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

Submitted 12.08.2020; accepted for publication 24.09.2020; published online 30.12.2020.

About the authors:

Irina G. Napalkova, Associate Professor, Department of World History, Political Science and Regional Studies, National Research Mordovia State University (68/1 Bolshevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), Ph. D. (History), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3896-1600, inapalckova@yandex.ru

Ksenia V. Kurochkina, Political Scientist; Master’s Degree Student, Department of World History, Political Science and Regional Studies; Research Officer, Center for Science and Education ‘Political Analysis of Territorial Systems’, National Research Mordovia State University (68/1 Bolshevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6993-4766, ksen.kurochckina2017@yandex.ru

Contribution of the authors:

Irina G. Napalkova – academic supervision; putting forward the basic idea of the study; substantiation of the theoretical and methodological foundations of the study; critical analysis; drawing conclusions; writing the article.

Ksenia V. Kurochkina – conducting the study; search for analytical materials; analysis of statistical and factual material; preparation of the initial version of the text.

The authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

To download article