M. S. Ashilova, A. S. Begalinov, Yu. V. Pushkarev, I. Yu. Pushkareva, K. K. Begalinova, E. A. Pushkareva. Assessment Future Evolution of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): SWOT Analysis (Global and Regional Measuring)

UDК 316.421

doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.126.032.202401.144-162

Abstract

Introduction. Digital technologies contribute to the rapid development of communications in various spheres of society. However, MOOCs, despite being a young and exciting phenomenon, have both positive and negative aspects. The purpose of the article is to study and analyze the phenomenon of MOOCs in its global and regional dimensions, and assessment their future evolution, identifying the strengths and weaknesses in their development, especially for the development of regional education systems.

Materials and Methods. Theoretical research is carried out in the context of a systematic approach to maximize the study of all the features and patterns of the phenomenon under study, which is a system. The research methodology used is SWOT analysis, which helps to identify the advantages, disadvantages, opportunities, and threats for the future of higher education. The method helped to identify, on the one hand, the positive and negative aspects of the development of massive open online courses of the MOOC, on the other, to identify the opportunities and threats of online learning systems for the future development of higher education (global and regional levels).

Results. The authors show that open online courses are an important addition to traditional university education, built on the basis of common forms, but working within the framework of a regional dimension. They allow you to increase the level of knowledge and competencies in various industries and beyond territorial borders by building specific online communities). However, the authors also show that this open communication system is considered by many of its participants not as a specific addition to the traditional one, but as its real alternative. The main results of the study is the identification of hidden and unexpressed weaknesses in the MOOC system. Instead of the expected democratization of education and enlightenment, if the existing threats are underestimated, it may lead to degradation and a new phase of the global educational crisis. The scientific novelty of this research lies in the fact that the phenomenon of MOOCs is still young and has been poorly studied in scientific literature.

Discussion and Conclusion. In conclusion, the authors summarize the specifics of the manifestations of an open system of knowledge communication (its global and regional dimensions). The practical significance of this study of the authors lies in the analysis and generalization of the problems of the development of online education. This article will be useful for anyone interested in research issues of theoretical and practical aspects of the modern education system development (both regional and global levels of its formation).

Keywords: global social systems, regional changes in social systems, MOOCs, open online communities, SWOT analysis, prospects for the development of education, information development of society, aspects of regional systems, open communication system, digital communication technologies

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The work was carried out with the financial support of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan within the framework of the scientific project AP09058341 “Transformation of the values of Kazakhstan higher education system in a multicultural and globalizing world”.

For citation: Ashilova M.S., Begalinov A.S., Pushkarev Yu.V., Pushkareva I.Yu., Begalinova K.K., Pushkareva E.A. Assessment Future Evolution of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): SWOT Analysis (Global and Regional Measuring). Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2024;32(1):144–162. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.126.032.202401.144-162

REFERENCES

1. Urooj S., Sajjad A., Bano N., Mukarram M. Gutenberg and the MOOC. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2022;17(12):93–105. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i12.31357

2. Begalinov A.S., Ashilova M.S., Begalinova K.K. On the Image of Higher Education in the Post-Covid World: Formation and Development of the New Type of Thinking. Science for Education Today. 2021;11(1):110–123. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.07

3. Pushkarev Yu.V., Pushkareva E.A. Specifics of Information and Communication Developments in Education: Analysis of Value Changes Before and After 2020 (A Critical Review). Science for Education Today. 2021;11(6):96–119. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2106.06

4. Liyanagunawardena T.R., Adams A.A., Williams S.A. MOOCs: A Systematic Study of the Published Literature 2008‒2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2013;14(3):202‒227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455

5. Alhazzani N. MOOC’s Impact on Higher Education. Social Science & Humanities Open. 2020;2(1):100030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100030

6. Pushkarev Yu.V., Pushkareva E.A. Virtualization of Social Communication in Education: Values-Based Approach to Information Development (A Critical Review). Science for Education Today. 2020;10(2):73–90. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2002.05

7. Ashilova M.S., Begalinov A.S., Begalinova K.K. About the Impact of Digitalization of Society on Education in Kazakhstan. Science for Education Today. 2019;9(6):40–51. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1906.03

8. Pushkarev Yu.V., Pushkareva E.A. Reflexive Principles of Personal Development in the Changing Information Content. Science for Education Today. 2019;9(2):52–66. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.04

9. Pavlíkova M., Sirotkin A., Kralik R., Petrikovicova L., Garcia M.J. How to Keep University Active During COVID-19 Pandemic: Experience from Slovakia. Sustainability. 2021;13(18):10350. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810350

10. Ashilova M.S., Begalinov A.S., Begalinova K.K. The Collapse of Neoliberal Concept of Education in the COVID-19 Era and the Prospects for Post-COVID Education. Science for Education Today. 2022;12(1):30–54. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2201.02

11. Chernykh S.I., Allaham Y.S., Parshikov V.I. Education as a Destructor of Social Order. Science for Education Today. 2021;11(2):81–101. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2102.04

12. Latuha O.A. Assessing the Sustainability Development of an Organization. Science for Education Today. 2021;11(6):142–159. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2106.08

13. Trofimov V.M. On the Nature of the Sustainability of the Process in Time. Science for Education Today. 2021;11(5):27–42. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2105.02

14. Tkacová H., Pavlikova M., Jenisová Z., Maturkanič P., Kralik R. Social Media and Students’ Wellbeing: An Empirical Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability. 2021;13(18):10442. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810442

15. Kostina L.M., Kalabina I.A., Nikolaeva E.I., Dunaevskaya E.B. Problems of Emergency Distance Learning: The Point of View of Education Stakeholders. Science for Education Today. 2023;13(3):7–27. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2303.01

16. Toktarova V.I., Rebko O.V., Semenova D.A. Comparative Analysis of Models of Educators’ Digital Competencies in the Context of Digital Transformation of Education. Science for Education Today. 2023;13(5):79–104. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2305.04

17. Petrovic F., Murgas F., Kralik R. Happiness in Czechia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability. 2021;13(19):10826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910826

18. Gonashvili A.S., Lanina E.E., Spirina M.Y. Establishing Scientific Educational Space within the University: Factors Contributing to Successful Eurasian Integration. Science for Education Today. 2023;13(5):179–194. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2305.09

19. Ashilova M.S., Begalinov A.S., Pushkarev Yu.V., Begalinova K.K., Pushkareva E.A. Values in Foundation of Modern Globalizing Society: Change Study. Science for Education Today. 2023;13(2):99–121. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2302.05

20. Emikh N.A., Fomina M.N. Specifics of the New Paradigm of Higher Education in the Context of its Digitalization. Science for Education Today. 2023;13(4):100–121. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2304.05

21. Ivanchenko I.S. Assessing the Prospects for Using Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education System. Science for Education Today. 2023;13(4):170–194. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2304.08

22. Zheng B., Tong D., Li M., Liu F., Hong C., Geng G., et al. Trends in China’s Anthropogenic Emissions Since 2010 as the Consequence of Clean air Actions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2018;18(19):14095–14111. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018

23. Ng A., Widom J. Origins of the Modern MOOC (xMOOC). MOOCs: Expectations and Reality: Full Report, Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University. New York; 2014. Available at: https://ai.stanford.edu/~ang/papers/mooc14-OriginsOfModernMOOC.pdf (accessed 28.06.2023).

24. Despujol I., Castañeda L., Marín V. I., Turró C. What Do We Want to Know About MOOCs? Results from a Machine Learning Approach to a Systematic Literature Mapping Review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2022;19:53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00359-1

25. Rodriguez C.O. MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. 2012;2012(1). Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/73828/ (accessed 28.06.2023).

26. Smriti A., Kumar R. A SWOT Analysis of MOOC on Management Education Teaching. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts. 2021;9(2):5024–5030. Available at: https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2102605.pdf (accessed 28.06.2023).

27. Jewitt K. The MOOC Revolution – Massive Open Online Courses: The Answer to Problems Facing Education or an Experiment that Could Destroy Centuries of Tradition. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching. 2017;10(1). https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v10i1.371

28. Aljarrah A.A., Ababneh M.A.-K., Cavus N. The Role of Massive Open Online Courses during the COVID-19 Era. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences. 2020;7(3):142–152. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v7i3.5244

29. Despujol I., Castañeda L., Turró C. MOOCs as a Massive Learning Resource for a Higher Education Community. The Universitat Politècnica de València Experience Using the EdX Remote Access Program. Education and Information Technologies. 2022;27(9):12999–13020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11140-2

30. Dillahunt T.R., Wang B.Z., Teasley S. Democratizing Higher Education: Exploring MOOC Use Among Those Who Cannot Afford a Formal Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2014;15(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1841

31. Ho A.D., Reich J., Nesterko S.O., Seaton D.T., Mullaney T., Waldo J., et al. HarvardX and MITx: The First Year of Open Online Courses, Fall 2012-Summer 2013. HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1. 2014. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381263

32. Conway M. Contested Ideas and Possible Futures for the University. On the Horizon. 2019;28(1):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/oth-10-2019-0070

33. Perkin H. History of Universities. In: Forest J., Altbach P., editors. The International Handbook of Higher Education. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. p. 159‒205. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_10

34. Magomedov K.M. Knowledge and Information in Various Cognitive and Communication Strategies. Herald of Dagestan State University. Series 3. Social Sciences. 2019;34(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.21779/2500-1930-2019-34-1-39-47

35. Li Y. The Impact of Massive Open Online Courses Globalization on the Educational Equity. In: 2021 2nd International Conference on Education, Knowledge and Information Management (ICEKIM). 2021. p. 248–251. https://doi.org/10.1109/icekim52309.2021.00061

36. Pollack Ichou R. Can MOOCs Reduce Global Inequality in Education? Australasian Marketing Journal. 2018;26(2):116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.05.007

Submitted 16.11.2023; approved after reviewing 23.01.2024; accepted for publication 01.02.2024.

About the authors:

Madina S. Ashilova, Cand.Sci. (Philos.), Ph.D, Associate Professor, Chair of International Communications, Abylai Khan Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages (200 Muratbayev St., Almaty 050001, Republic of Kazakhstan), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7634-7727, madina.almatytv@mail.ru

Alibek S. Begalinov, Cand.Sci. (Philos.), Ph.D, Associate Professor, Chair of Media Communications and History of Kazakhstan, International University of Information Technologies (34/1 Manas St., Almaty 050001, Republic of Kazakhstan), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7439-221X, alibek557@inbox.ru

Yury V. Pushkarev, Cand.Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, Chair of Law and Philosophy, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University (28 Vilyuiskaya St., Novosibirsk 630126, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5919-7221, pushkarev73@mail.ru

Irina Yu. Pushkareva, Masterʼs Student, Institute of Arts, Institute of Continuing Education, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University (28 Vilyuiskaya St., Novosibirsk 630126, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6344-1694, irina.phr@mail.ru

Kalimash K. Begalinova, Dr.Sci. (Philos.), Professor, Chair of Religious Studies and Cultural Studies, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (71 Al-Farabi Ave., Almaty 050001, Republic of Kazakhstan), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5575-5142, kalima910@mail.ru

Elena A. Pushkareva, Dr.Sci. (Philos.), Professor, Chair of Law and Philosophy, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University (28 Vilyuiskaya St., Novosibirsk 630126, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1857-6783, pushkarev73@mail.ru

Contribution of the authors:

M. S. Ashilova ‒ collection of materials and initiation of research; definition of research methodology; literary review.

A. S. Begalinov ‒ collection of materials; preparation of the initial version of the text.

Yu.V. Pushkarev ‒ structuring and analysis of research data.

I. Yu. Pushkareva ‒ structuring and analysis of research data.

K. K. Begalinova ‒ the collection of materials; formulation of a scientific problem research and definition of the main directions of its decision.

E. A. Pushkareva ‒ organization of the study; interpretation of the research results.

The authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.