A. D. Volkov, N. A. Roslyakova. Ecological Behavior of the Population of the Murmansk Region: Features and Factors

https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.033.202501.152-170
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/yuycfa
УДК / UDC 502.2:122

Abstract

Introduction. One of the most important conditions for ensuring sustainable development of the Arctic is overcoming the contradictions between economic and environmental constraints on the functioning of its socio-ecological-economic systems. The key importance in the development of mechanisms for this overcoming lies in the involvement of the population in pro-environmental activity. The aim of the study is to identify the features and factors of pro-environmental behavior of the population of the Murmansk Region, as well as their willingness to take responsibility for solving environmental problems.

Materials and Methods. The empirical basis of the work was the results of a sociological study conducted in the Murmansk region (2023, n = 1,258, multistage sampling). In the process of data processing the methods of descriptive and multivariate statistics were applied. For econometric analysis we used the binary choice model, which allowed us to study and evaluate the influence of basic characteristics of respondents (gender, age, income, education), as well as factors of the model “values ‒ beliefs ‒ norms” on the frequency of manifestation of individual practices of environmentally responsible behavior.

Results. It was found that the population of the Arctic territories is quite active in the field of environmental protection. Common practices of pro-environmental behavior include refraining from unauthorized garbage disposal, active participation in community work days, and minimizing the use of disposable tableware and polyethylene packaging. The basic characteristics of respondents (gender, age, income and education) and their value orientations have a differentiated impact on the realization of individual pro-environmental practices of the population. However, understanding the importance of a clean environment increases the likelihood of realizing most of them.

Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the study enrich scientific understanding of the factors and specifics of pro-environmental behavior in regions with unique climatic, infrastructural, economic, and other characteristics, and provide a basis for the development of regulatory measures in this area.

Keywords: Arctic region, Murmansk region, environmental behavior of the population, environmental problems, value-belief-norm theory, binary choice model

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The study was carried out within the framework of the state assignment of Department of Integrated Scientific Research of the Karelian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences “Issues of ensuring environmental safety in the Arctic” (FMEN-2024-0013): No. 124053000099-7.”

For citation: Volkov A.D., Roslyakova N.A. Ecological Behavior of the Population of the Murmansk Region: Features and Factors. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2025;33(1):152–170. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.033.202501.152-170

REFERENCES

1. Söderholm P., Svahn N. Mining, Regional Development and Benefit-Sharing in Developed Countries. Resources Policy. 2015;45:78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.03.003

2. Behringer K., Szegedi K. The Role of CSR in Achieving Sustainable Development-Theoretical Approach. European Science Journal. 2016;(12):10–25. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n22p10

3. Poelzer G., Yu S. All Trust is Local: Sustainable Development, Trust in Government and Legitimacy in Northern Mining Projects. Resources Policy. 2021;70:101888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101888

4. Koivurova T., Buanes A., Riabova L., Didyk V., Ejdemo T., Poelzer G., et al. ‘Social License to Operate’: A Relevant Term in Northern European Mining? Polar Geography. 2015;38(3):194–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2015.1056859

5. Lange F., Dewitte S. Measuring Pro-Environmental Behavior: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2019;63:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.009

6. Ngoc Q.T.K., Xuan B.B., Börger T., Hien T.T., Hao T.V., Trinh D.T., Nghiep V.K. Exploring Fishers’ Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention and Support for Policies to Combat Marine Litter in Vietnam. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2024;200:116143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116143

7. Cao F., Jian Y. The Role of Integrating AI and VR in Fostering Environmental Awareness and Enhancing Activism among College Students. Science of the Total Environment. 2024;908:168200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168200

8. Wei F., Abbas J., Alarifi G., Zhang Z., Adam N.A., de Queiroz M.J. Role of Green Intellectual Capital and Top Management Commitment in Organizational Environmental Performance and Reputation: Moderating Role of Pro-Environmental Behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023;405:136847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136847

9. Majeed S., Kim W.G., Kim T. Perceived Green Psychological Benefits and Customer Pro-Environment Behavior in the Value-Belief-Norm Theory: The Moderating Role of Perceived Green CSR. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2023;113:103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103502

10. Gansser O.A., Reich C.S. Influence of the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) and Environmental Concerns on Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023;382:134629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134629

11. Wang D., Xu Y., Wang Y., Chen Y. What Determines the Batteries Recycling Behavior of E-Bike Citizens in Guangzhou?: Integrating Place Identity and Environmental Concern into the Extended Norm Activation Model. Heliyon. 2024;10(9):e30234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30234

12. Kozlovskiy V.V., Nedoseka E.V., Tishkov S.V. Environmental Practices of Waste Management in the Small Towns of the European Part in the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2022;30(1):129–154. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.118.030.202201.129-154

13. Tishkov S., Tleppayev A., Karginova-Gubinova V., Volkov A., Shcherbak A. Citizens’ Behavior as a Driver of Energy Transition and Greening of the Economy in the Russian Arctic: Findings of a Sociological Survey in the Murmansk Region and Karelia. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(3):1460. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031460

14. Perepelkin N.A., Lukina A.V., Mkhitaryan S.V., Grosheva Yu.V., Lukina E.A. Study of Pro-Environmental Behavior of Residents of the Moscow Agglomeration. Marketing and Marketing Research. 2023;(4):282–290. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.36627/2074-5095-2023-4-4-282-290

15. Astratova G.V., Rutkauskas T.K., Rutkauskas K.V. Solid Municipal Waste Treatment Problems and Responsible Consumption in a Green Economy. Russian Journal of Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2022;9(2). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15862/08ECOR222

16. Berthold A., Cologna V., Hardmeier M., Siegrist M. Drop Some Money! The Influence of Income and Subjective Financial Scarcity on Pro-Environmental Behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2023;91:102149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102149

17. Rozhentsova E.V., Tretiakova E.A., Shimanovsky D.B. Factors of Pro-Ecological Behavior of Citizens. ECO Journal. 2023;53(2):123–136. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2023-2-123-136

18. Bleidorn W., Lenhausen M.R., Hopwood C.J. Proenvironmental Attitudes Predict Proenvironmental Consumer Behaviors over Time. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2021;76:101627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101627

19. Kilbourne W., Pickett G. How Materialism Affects Environmental Beliefs, Concern, and Environmentally Responsible Behavior. Journal of Business Research. 2008;61(9):885–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.016

20. Hong J., She Y., Wang S., Dora M. Impact of Psychological Factors on Energy-saving Behavior: Moderating Role of Government Subsidy Policy. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;232:154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.321

21. Uram P., Skalski S., Kwiatkowska A. Values and Materialism as Predictors of Pro-Environmental Attitudes. The Herzen University Studies: Psychology in Education. 2021;(4):678–686. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2021-4-87

22. Alexandrova E.S. Relationship of Proecological Behavior and Personal Values of the Individual: Gender Aspect. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology. 2021;14(4):13‒19. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0861-2021-4-13-20

23. Kanzola A.-M., Papaioannou K., Petrakis P.E. Environmental Behavioral Perceptions under Uncertainty of Alternative Economic Futures. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2023;190:122428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122428

24. Stern P.C. New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of social Issues. 2000;56(3):407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

25. Liobikienė G., Liobikas J., Brizga J., Juknys R. Materialistic Values Impact on Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Case of Transition Country as Lithuania. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;244:118859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118859

26. Minelgaitė A., Liobikienė G. Changes in Pro-Environmental Behaviour and its Determinants during Long-term Period in a Transition Country as Lithuania. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2021;23:16083–16099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01329-9

27. Xu D., He J., Qing C., Zhang F. Impact of Perceived Environmental Regulation on Rural Residents’ Willingness to Pay for Domestic Waste Management. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023;412:137390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137390

28. Xie B.C., Zhao W., Yin Z.L., Xie P. How Much Will the Residents Pay for Clean Energy? Empirical Study Using the Double Bound Dichotomous Choice Method for Tianjin, China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;241:118208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118208

About the authors:

Alexander D. Volkov, Cand.Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Integrated Arctic Research, Department of Integrated Scientific Research of the Karelian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (50 Prospekt A. Nevskogo, Petrozavodsk 185030, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-8483, Researcher ID: AAF-8665-2020, Scopus ID: 57211205634, SPIN-code: 2133-8597, kov8vol@gmail.com
Natalia A. Roslyakova, Cand.Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Integrated Arctic Research, Department of Integrated Scientific Research of the Karelian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (50 Prospekt A. Nevskogo, Petrozavodsk 185030, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7511-2141, Researcher ID: P-6162-2015, Scopus ID: 57209798987, SPIN-code: 7405-4998, na@roslyakova24.ru

Contribution of the authors:

A. D. Volkov – formulation of the research problem; data collection and analysis; preparation of the text of the article; formulation of research results and conclusions.
N. A. Roslyakova – data analysis; preparation of the text of the article; formulation of research results and conclusions.

Availability of data and materials. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.

The authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 17.08.2024; revised 28.10.2024; accepted 16.12.2024.