A. V. Smirnova, M. O. Dashkova. Analysis of the Legal and Infrastructural Basis for the Scientific and Technological Sphere in the Regions of Russia: Potential and Prospects for the Formation of Connectedness of the Country’s Territories

UDK 330.44(470+571)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.109.027.201904.678-710

Introduction. The formation of regional differentiation weakens the unity and sustainability of the country’s development as a whole, which hinders its transition to an innovative economic model and joining the ranks of the of the world’s leading technological powers. The objective of this paper is to give a comprehensive analysis of the state of the regional scientific and technological sphere of eleven constituent entities of the Russian Federation and to assess the existing groundwork and potential for the formation of a single scientific and technological space.

Materials and Methods. The study has been implemented in two stages and has employed the methods of induction and deduction, as well as those of systemic and comparative analysis. The study has examined data from the Consultant Plus system and the annual monitoring survey conducted by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia through the internet portal ‘Scientific and Technological Infrastructure of the Russian Federation – Centers for Collective use of Scientific Equipment and Unique Scientific Installations’.

Results. The equipment of the legislative framework with legal and regulatory instruments in the field of science regulation has been examined; the scientific and infrastructural equipment of 11 regions has been analyzed. The existence of a strong differentiation between the studied territories has been revealed and proved. The regions that are the leaders and laggards in terms of the degree of development of the legal and infrastructural components of the scientific and technological industry have been identified.

Discussion and Conclusion. This article presents the results of the first stage of a comprehensive study which is supposed to make an attempt to build and describe a model of scientific and technological cooperation of the territories of Russia based on the case study of 11 regions. The results of the work can be useful to researchers and specialists in the field of regional development and management in the scientific and technological sphere, as well as in the field of development of scientific and technological cooperation and connectedness of territories.

Keywords: connectedness of territories, scientific and technological cooperation, Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation, scientific infrastructure facilities

Funding. The study was carried out as part of the RIEPL’s state assignment ‘Monitoring and expert and analytical support for the implementation of the state policy in the field of scientific and technological connectedness of the territory of the Russian Federation’ (project No. 26.13358.2019/13.1).


1. Kuznetsova E.P. Efficiency of Implementation of State Support of Development of Scientific and Technological Cooperation. Vestnik Vladimirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Aleksandra Grigoryevicha i Nikolaya Grigoryevicha Stoletovykh (Seriya: Ehkonomicheskiye nauki) = Bulletin of the Vladimir State University named after Alexander G. and Nicholas G. Stoletovs. Series: Economics. 2018; (3):167-173. Available at: http://vestnik-es.vlsu.ru/fileadmin/No17/Vestnik_No_17.pdf (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. Kuznetsova E.P. Scientific and Technological Cooperation in Russia: Current State, Problems and Instruments of Government Support. Voprosy territorialnogo razvitiya = Territorial development Issues. 2019; (1):1-12. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.15838/tdi.2019.1.46.4

3. Hedge D., Hicks D. The Maturation of Global Corporate R&D: Evidence from the Activity of U.S. Foreign Subsidiaries. Research Policy. 2008; 37:390-406. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.004

4. Jones Ch.I. R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy. 1995. 103(4):759-784. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2138581?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Eng.)

5. Rezanov K.V. Coherence and Strategic Sinergizm as the Basis of Complex Formations: Qualitative Analysis of Clustering. Vlast i upravleniye na Vostoke Rossii = Power and Administration in the East of Russia. 2015; (1):60-66. Available at: http://vlastdviu.ru/index.php?page=rio4-2015(1-70)&rc=rio (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

6. Matyukin S.V. Fokin A.E. Analysis of Cluster Development in High-Tech Sectors: Adaptation of International Experience for Modernization of the Regional Economy. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya = Fundamental Research. 2019; (1):33-39. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.17513/fr.42401

7. Glazman G.L. The Forms of Globalization of Innovative Processes. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Obschestvennyye nauki = University Proceedings. Volga Region. Social Sciences. 2013; (3):180-188. Available at: https://izvuz_on.pnzgu.ru/on20313 (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

8. Mierin L.A., Glazman G.L. Russia’s Integration into Global Innovation Space: Conceptual and Managerial Approach. Teoriya i praktika servisa: ehkonomika, sotsialnaya sfera, tekhnologii = Theory and Practice of Service: Economics, Social Sphere, Technology. 2015; (1):10-14. Available at: https://unecon.ru/izdaniya/teoriya-i-praktika-servisa/arhiv (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

9. Zhitinskaya L.O. On the Prospects of Formation of Competitive and Innovative Regional Economy. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universita inzhenernykh tekhnologiy = Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2017; 79(1):392-400. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2017-1-392-400

10. Kutsenko E. Pilot Innovative Territorial Clusters in Russia: A Sustainable Development Model. Forsajt = Foresight. 2015; 9(1):32-55. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459X.2015.1.32.55

11. Asheim B., Gertler M. The Geography of Innovation. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. 2005. p. 291-317. (In Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011

12. Volchkova I.V., Danilova M.N., Podoprigora Yu.V., Seliverstov A.A., Ufimtseva T.V., Shadeiko N.R. Assessing Economic and Social Interaction Intensity within Agglomeration Territory in the Aspect of Socio-Economic Space Coherence. Voprosy upravleniya = Management Issues. 2016; (4):182-195. Available at: http://vestnik.uapa.ru/ru/issue/2016/04/25/ (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

13. Polozhentseva Yu.S. [Quantitative Assessment of the Development Level of Interregional Connectedness of the Economic Space]. Innovatsionnaya ehkonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya = Innovative Economy: Prospects for Development and Improvement. 2018; (3):116-128. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35039976 (accessed 25.10.2019). (In Russ.)

14. Yusupov R.M., Sokolov B.V. Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation for the Long Term. Innovatsii = Innovations. 2016; (7):30-32. Available at: https://maginnov.ru/ru/zhurnal/arhiv/2016/innovacii-n7-2016/strategii-na... (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

15. Starodubov V.I., Kurakova N.G. Identifying the Subject in the Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2016; 86(6):441-447. (In Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331616060150

16. Kurakova N.G., Zinov V.G., Tsvetkova L.A. The System of Measurable Indicators for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation: Methodology and Design. Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2017; 44(3):184-195. (In Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688217030054

17. Kuzyk M., Grebenyuk A., Kakaeva E., Manchenko E., Dovgiy V. What Impedes Universities from Creating Dual-Purpose Technologies? Forsajt = Foresight and STI Governance. 2017; 11(4):84-95. (In Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.84.95

18. Dementiev V.V., Slobodyanik S.N. Government Programs as a Tool for the Implementation of the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation. Nauchnyye trudy: Institut narodokhozyaystvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN = Scientific Articles-Institute of Economic Forecasting Russian Academy of Sciences. 2017; (15):316-335. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/gosudarstvennye-programmy-kak-instrume... (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

19. Pogosyan M.A., Strelets D.Y., Vladimirova V.G. Territorial Connectivity of the Russian Federation: From the Statement of Complex Problems to Drawing up Integrated Scientific and Technical Projects. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019; 89(2):179-184. (In Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331619020175

20. Maltseva A., Klyushnikova E., Barsukova N., Gridchina A., Guseva M. Integral Express Analysis of Institutional and Legal Readiness of the Russian Federation’ Subjects to Implement the Priorities of Scientific and Technological Development. Amazonia Investiga. 2019; 8(19):72-82. Available at: https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/201 (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Eng.)

21. Sukhovey A.F., Golova I.M. Substantiation of the Transformation of the Priorities of Innovation and Technological Development of Russian Regions in the Global Crisis. Ehkonomika regiona = Economy of Region. 2016; 12(3):911-923. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.17059/2016-3-25

22. Azagra-Caro J.M., Consoli D. Knowledge Flows, the Influence of National R&D Structure and the Moderating Role of Public-Private Cooperation. Journal of Technology Transfer. 2016; 41(1):152-172. (In Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9382-7

23. Gershman M., Kuznetsova T. Specificities of Involving Small Enterprises into International S&T Cooperation: Evidence from the Linkages between Russia and Germany. Forsajt = Foresight-Russia. 2012; 6(3):51-61. Available at: https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/2012-6-3/62922199.html (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

24. Balyakin A.A., Zadorina A.K., Kuklina I.R., Malyshev A.S., Taranenko S.B. Positioning of International Scientific-Technical Cooperation in the Legal Documents of the Countries Participating in Scientific Globalization. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya = RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018; 18(4):651-667. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2018-18-4-651-667

25. Gonnova S.M., Sheremet Yu.E., Razuvaeva E.Yu., Rebkovets M.Yu. Adapting the CIS Cooperation Formats to the Modern Context Based on Scientific and Technological Policy Coordination. Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2017; 44(3):236-246. (In Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688217040025

26. Sidorova E.A. The Innovation Development of the BRICS Countries: Preconditions and Prospects for Cooperation. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy: obrazovaniye, nauka, novaya ehkonomika = International Organisations Research Journal. 2018; (1):34-50. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-01-02

27. Powell W.W., Snellman K. The Knowledge Economy. Annual Review of Sociology. 2004; 30(1):199-220. (In Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037

28. Kotsemir M., Kuznetsova T., Nasybulina E., Pikalova A. Identifying Directions for Russia’s Science and Technology Cooperation. Foresight and STI Governance. 2015; 9(4):54-72. (In Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459x.2015.4.54.72

29. Balashova M.V., Bukhaeva E.E., Kuklina E.R., Luksha O.P., Yanovsky A.E. Mechanisms for Supporting Scientific and Technological Cooperation between the BRICS States: Multilateral Calls and Networking Platform for Knowledge and Technology Transfer. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2016; 7(5):2777-2786. Available at: https://www.rjpbcs.com/2016_7.5.html (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Eng.)

30. Ivanov S.A., Sokol-Nomokonov E.N. The Phenomenon of Flagship Universities of Regional Economy in Modern Russia. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2018; 27(1):19-30. Available at: http://vovr.ru/upload/1-18.pdf (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

31. Gafurov I.R., Safiullin M.R., Elshin L.A. Mechanisms and Directions of Development of Higher School in the System of Innovative Technological Development of National Economy. Alma Mater (Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly) = Alma Mater (Higher School Herald). 2017; (11):5-10. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.20339/AM.11-17.005

32. Lundvall B.A., Johnson B., Andersen E.S., Dalum B. National Systems of Production, Innovation and Competence Building. Research Policy. 2002; 3(2):213-231. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8

33. Saviotti P.P. Innovation Systems and Evolutionary Theories. In: Systems of Innovation – Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London, Pinter Publishers/Cassell Academic; 1997. p. 180-199. URL: https://charlesedquist.com/books/systems-of-innovation-technologies-inst... (accessed: 25.07.2019). (In Eng.)

34. Almeida A., Figueiredo A., Rui Silva M. From Concept to Policy: Building Regional Innovation Systems in Follower Regions. European Planning Studies. 2011; 19(7):1331-1356. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.573140

35. Cooke P. Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2001; 10(4):945-974. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945

36. Edquist Ch. Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D., Nelson R., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. London: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 181-208. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0007

37. Nuur C., Gustavsson L., Laestadius S. Promoting Regional Innovation Systems in a Global Context. Industry and Innovation. 2009; 16(1):123-139. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710902728142

38. Kratke S., Brandt A. Knowledge Networks as a Regional Development Resource: A Network Analysis of the Interlinks between Scientific Institutions and Regional Firms in the Metropolitan Region of Hannover, Germany. European Planning Studies. 2009; 17(1):43-63. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802513930

39. Seliverstov V.E., Melnikova L.V., Kolomak E.A., Kryukov V.A., Suslov V.I., Suslov N.I. Spatial Development Strategy of Russia: Expectations and Realities. Regional Research of Russia. 2019; 9(2):155-163. (In Eng.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970519020114

40. Kalyuzhniy K.A. The Results of the Monitoring of Russian Core Shared Research Facilities and Unique Scientific Installations for 2017. Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie = Science. Innovation. Education. 2018; (4):40-78. Available at: http://sie-journal.ru/itogi-monitoringa-deyatelnosti-rossijskih-czentrov... (accessed 25.07.2019). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

Submitted 08.08.2019; accepted for publication 20.09.2019; published online 30.12.2019.

About the authors:

Anastasia V. Smirnova, Laboratory Researcher, Center for International Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (20A, Dobrolubova St., Moscow 127254, Russia), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1668-1149, a.smirnova@riep.ru

Maria O. Dashkova, Junior Researcher, Center for Legal Studies, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (20A, Dobrolubova St., Moscow 127254, Russia), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1469-0343, m.dashkova@riep.ru

Contribution of the authors:

Anastasia V. Smirnova – literature review; analysis of the state of scientific infrastructure in certain regions of the Russian Federation.

Maria O. Dashkova – analysis of the regional regulatory framework for the development of scientific and technological activities in certain regions of the Russian Federation.

For citation:

Smirnova A.V., Dashkova M.O. Analysis of the Legal and Infrastructural Basis for the Scientific and Technological Sphere in the Regions of Russia: Potential and Prospects for the Formation of Connectedness of the Country’s Territories. Regionology = Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2019; 27(4):678-710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.109.027.201904.678-710

The authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

To download article

Лицензия Creative Commons
All the materials of the "REGIONOLOGY" journal are available under Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0