T. M. Dadaeva, T. A. Kuznetsova. The Phenomenon of Anti-Café or New Places for Leisure Time Activities of Young People in the Context of Virtualization of the Urban Space (The Case Study of Rubikovʼs Cube Smart Place in the City of Saransk)

UDK 379.8-053.81

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.116.029.202103.709-729

Introduction. New places for leisure time activities in the format of anti-café, created by initiative townsmen, have been gaining popularity in the urban space over the past ten years, which has made the study of this topic relevant. The article studies the leisure time activities of young people, identifies the features of the structure, content, and functions in the conditions of an anti-café, and conceptualizes the causes and potential of the phenomenon of anti-café in the urban space.

Materials and Methods. Data from unstructured interviews with visitors and the management, as well as participant observation of Rubikov’s Cube Smart Place in the city of Saransk were used as the empirical basis for this study. Using analytical methods and research techniques (analysis, generalization, induction, deduction, as well as the systemic approach) made it possible to substantiate the authors’ point of view on the causes, functions and potential of new places for leisure time activities of young people in the urban space.

Results. The authors have raised the theoretical problem of the emergence of new places for leisure time activities of young people in the context of hypermodernity and the development of media technologies in urban spaces. Based on the data from a case-study of the anti-café, popular leisure time activities have been identified, as well as structure, content, and functions of the anti-café, and motivations for visiting such places and socio-demographic characteristics of the main anti-café customers. The authors have also identified the contradictions in the reasons for the popularity of anti-cafés in the context of hypermodernity, emphasizing that anti-cafés create new forms of loneliness and the need for the “third place”, multi-layered, hybrid spaces (where public turns into private, private into public, and online and offline communications intersect) in collective practices, which the city satisfies.

Discussion and Conclusion. Based on the conducted research, the authors have drawn a conclusion about the role of anti-cafés (time clubs, coworking spaces) in the formation of the future creative class, without which an effective economy is impossible. The difficulties in studying this topic were due to the lack of statistical data on the problem. The materials of this article will be useful for public authorities, entrepreneurs, specialists engaged in creating places for leisure time activities in the urban space, as well as when elaborating such training courses as “Sociology of the City” and “Sociology of Culture”.

Keywords: anti-cafe, time club, ‘third place’, ‘non-place’, leisure time activities, urban space, youth, virtualization, unstructured interview

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

For citation: Dadaeva T.M., Kuznetsova T.A. The Phenomenon of Anti-Café or New Places for Leisure Time Activities of Young People in the Context of Virtualization of the Urban Space (The Case Study of Rubikovʼs Cube Smart Place in the City of Saransk). Regionology = Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2021; 29(3):709-729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.116.029.202103.709-729

REFERENCES

1. Dadaeva T.M., Kuznetsova T.A. Third Place or the Phenomenon of Anti-cafe in the Modern City Space: Theoretical Approach. Ogarev-online. 2019; (9). Available at: http://journal.mrsu.ru/arts/trete-mesto-ili-fenomen-antikafe-v-gorodskom... (accessed 24.11.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. Park R.E. The Urban Community as a Spatial Pattern and a Moral Order. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie = Russian Sociological Review. 2006; 5(1):11-18. Available at: https://sociologica.hse.ru/data/2011/03/14/1211453107/5_1_3.pdf (accessed 24.11.2020). (In Russ.)

3. Bourdieu P. Forms of Capital. Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya = Economic Sociology. 2002; (5):60-74. Available at: https://ecsoc.hse.ru/data/2011/12/08/1208205039/ecsoc_t3_n5.pdf (accessed 24.11.2020). (In Russ.)

4. Eremicheva G.V. Social Space of the Big City. St. Petersburg: Sociological Institute of the RAS; 2018. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/monograph.2019.4

5. Zimmel G. Big Cities and Spiritual Life. Logos. 2002; (3):23-35. Available at: https://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/34/02.pdf (accessed 24.11.2020). (In Russ.)

6. Lebedeva E.V. Public Space in Post-Soviet Cities: Sociability and “Crisis of Publicity”. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii = Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2017; 20(1):74-92. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2017.20.1.5

7. Chernyaeva N. Cultural Geography and the Research Problem of Place: A Review of New Literature. Izvestiya uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Gumanitarnye nauki = Izvestia. Ural Federal University Journal. Series 2. Humanities and Arts. 2005; (35):273-283. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10995/23948 (accessed 24.11.2020). (In Russ.)

8. Crang M., Crosbie T., Graham S. Technology, Time-Space, and the Remediation of Neighbourhood Life. Environment and Planning. 2007; 39:2405-2422. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a38353

9. Quan-Haase A., Martin K. Digital Curation and the Networked Audience of Urban Events: Expanding La Fiesta de Santo Tomaґs from the Physical to the Virtual Environment. The International Communication Gazette. Special Issue on Mediated Urbanism. 2013; 75(5-6):521-537. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513491910

10. Ridell S., Zeller F. Mediated Urbanism: Navigating an Interdisciplinary Terrain. The International Communication Gazette. Special Issue on Mediated Urbanism. 2013; 75(5-6):437-451. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513491891

11. de Souza e Silva A. From Cyber to Hybrid: Mobile Technologies as Interfaces of Hybrid Spaces. Space and Culture. 2006; 9(3):261-278. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022

12. Wellman B. Physical Place and Cyber Place: The Rise of Networked Individualism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2001; 25(2):227-252. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00309

13. Zubok Yu.A. Chuprov I.V. Cultural Life and Cultural Practices of Young People in Small Towns: Features of Self-Regulation. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. 2020; (3):140-156. Available at: https://www.fnisc.ru/publ.html?id=8593&type=publ (accessed 24.11.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

14. Karavay A.V. Leisure Activity of Russian Youth: the Main Types and Factors of Choice. Vestnik obshhestvennogo mneniya. Dannye. Аnaliz. Diskussii = Russian Public Opinion Herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions. 2020; (1-2):130-140. Available at: https://www.levada.ru//cp/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/vom1-2020.pdf (accessed 17.12.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

15. Korsunova V.I. Public Leisure Practices in Russia: Status Distinctions and Structural Features. Monitoring obchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie I socialnie izmeneniya = Monitoring Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal. 2017; (5):194-213. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2017.5.11

16. Filonenko V.I., Shtompel L.A., Shtompel O.M. Cultural-Leisure Preferences of Russian Students in the Period of Social Transformations. Vlast = Authority. 2017; (11):70-78. Available at: https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/5481 (accessed 24.11.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

17. Kryazheva M.F., Shakirova E.S. Library as a “the Third Place”: Realization of the Concept. Bibliosfera = Bibliosphere. 2019; (3):93-98. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2019-3-93-98

18. Lyubchenko O.A., Ganicheva A.N., Kaitov A.P. To the Question about the Development of Co-Working by Environment in the Modern University. Vestnik Kostromskogo Gosudarstvennogp Universiteta = Vestnik Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics. 2018; 24(3):134-138. Available at: https://vestnik-pip.ksu.edu.ru/attachments/article/347/vestnik-pip-2018-3-ru.pdf (accessed 17.12.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

19. Pestova A.V. “Third places” of the Third Millennium: Revolution in Work and Leisure Space. Chelovek v mire kultury. Regionalnye kulturologicheskie issledovaniya = A Human Being in the World of Culture. Regional Cultural Studies. 2017; (2/3):183-185. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/treti-mesta-tretiego-tysyacheletiya-re... (accessed 17.12.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

20. Zakharov A.D. Coworking Places and Anti-Cafés as a Fundamentally New Way of Doing Business and Creating Startups. Actualnye problemy gumanitarnykh i estesvennykh nauk = Relevant Issues in Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2015; (8-1):44-46. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kovorking-i-antikafe-kak-printsipialno... (accessed 17.12.2020). (In Russ.)

21. Babayan I.V., Lyubimova A.D., Rusakovich E.F. “Be Oneself”: Sociocultural Environment of the Time Cafe in the Context of o City. Vestnik saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik Saratov State Technical University. 2014; (4):212-217. Available at: http://oldlib.sstu.ru/open/vestniki/2014/4_77_2014.pdf (accessed 24.11.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

22. Kvyat A.G. Anti-Cafe, Fast Food as a Media and Pop-Up Park: Post-Virtuality and City 3.0 in Russia. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya 7. Sotsiologiya, sotsialnye tekhnologii. Filosofiya = The Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies. 2014; (3):126-133. Available at: https://clck.ru/WuUA7 (accessed 24.11.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

23. Leontovich O.A. The Semiotic Landscape of Volgograd in the Context of Urban Communication Studies. Zhurnal Sibirskogo federalnogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki = Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2019; (12):97-105. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0382

Submitted 22.03.2021; approved after reviewing 26.04.2021; accepted for publication 10.05.2021.

About the authors:

Tatiana M. Dadaeva, Professor, Department of Sociology and Social Work, National Research Mordovia State University (68/1 Bolshevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), Dr. Sci. (Sociology), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9749-9244, dadaeva13@mail.ru

Tatiana A. Kuznetsova, Master’s Degree Student (Sociology), National Research Mordovia State University (68/1 Bolshevistskaya St., Saransk 430005, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0602-2281, tatyana.kuzneczova.1998@mail.ru

Contribution of the authors:

T. M. Dadaeva – academic supervision; statement of the research problem; choice of the concept and methodology of the research; interpretation and analysis of the materials; revision of the text of the article.

T. A. Kuznetsova – conducting the study and initial processing of the results; interpretation and analysis of the materials; preparation of the initial version of the text.

The authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
To download article