Ye. I. Haydanka. Electoral Cleavages and Fragmentation of Regions in the Slovak Republic: A Case Study of the Parliamentary Elections Held in 1990–2020

UDК 323.174(437.6)

DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.115.029.202102.230-249

Introduction. Electoral processes in the post-socialist countries have determined their political and party fragmentation, dividing regions into more conservative or liberal ones, those supporting or opposing the “firm leadership” of the country, Eurosceptic or Eurooptimistic. The main objective of the article is to present a comparative analysis of the outcomes of parliamentary elections in the regions, given the existing socio-political splits and the peculiarities of formation of the electoral cleavages.

Materials and Methods. The study was based on the results of the ten parliamentary elections held in the Slovak Republic in 1990–2020. The empirical material covers the macro (national) and micro (regional) levels. The comprehensive comparative method made it possible to single out the main socio-political splits that either confirm or refute electoral cleavages in the regions of the country.

Results. The main socio-political splits in the Slovak Republic have been identified. Given the results of the parliamentary elections in the regions of Slovakia, six electoral cleavages have been recorded (1998, 2002, 2006, 2010, 2016, and 2020). Two socio-political splits of “Meciarism – anti-Meciarism” (1998) and “Fico – anti-Fico” (2020) proved to be of particular significance for the country. The fragmentation of the Slovak political and party space is represented by two groups of regions: West and East (liberals and social populists), as well as the Center (conservatives).

Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the study can be used when devising an efficient regional development strategy based on minimizing the risks of radicalization of the political space and reducing the overall level of populism in the country.

Keywords: region, regionalization, political fragmentation in the Slovak Republic, socio-political split, electoral cleavages

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

For citation: Haydanka Ye.I. Electoral Cleavages and Fragmentation of Regions in the Slovak Republic: A Case Study of the Parliamentary Elections Held in 1990–2020. Regionology = Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2021; 29(2):230-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.115.029.202102.230-249

1. Elff M. Social Structure and Electoral Behavior in Comparative Perspective: The Decline of Social Cleavages in Western Europe Revisited. Perspectives on Politics. 2007; 5(2):277-294. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070788

2. Whitefield S. Political Cleavages and Post-Communist Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 2002; 5:181-200. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.112601.144242

3. Redžić E., Everett J. Cleavages in the Post-Communist Countries of Europe: A Review. Politics in Central Europe. 2020; 16(1):231-258. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2020-0011

4. Cleavages, Parties, and Voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Romania / eds. by A. Rommele, K. Lawson, G. Karasimeonov. London: Praeger; 1999. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Cleavages-Parties-Voters-Bulgaria-Political/dp/0275955893 (accessed 12.12.2020). (In Eng.).

5. Bakke E., Sitter N. Why do Parties Fail? Cleavages, Government Fatigue and Electoral Failure in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary 1992–2012. East European Politics. 2013; 29(2):208-225. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2013.786702

6. Szabó B., Tátrai P. Regional and Social Cleavages in the Slovak Elections after the Change of the Regime. Geografický časopis = Geographical Journal. 2016; 68(3):195-212. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309670733_Regional_and_social_cleavages_in_the_Slovak_elections_after_the_change_of_the_regime (accessed 12.12.2020). (In Eng.)

7. Plešivčák M. Ideology, Cleavages, and Voting Behaviour in 2009 and 2013 Regional Elections in Slovakia. Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Geographica. 2017; 52(1):90-105. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2017.8

8. Martinkovič M. Regionálne voľby do VÚC ako prejav krízy funkčnosti strán v Slovenskom straníckom systéme. Politologická analýza regionálnych volieb 2017 na Slovensku / editori I. Dudinská, M. Cirner, G. Székely. Prešov: Vydavateľstvo Prešovskej university; 2018. p. 39-49. (In Slovak)

9. Plešivčák M. Position of Slovak Regions in the Light of Electoral Support for Parties in the Parliamentary Elections Held Between 2002 and 2010. Geografický časopis = Geographical Journal. 2011; 63(3):227-251. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262680504_Postavenie_regionov_Slovenska_z_hladiska_uzemi_volebnej_podpory_politickych_stran_v_parlamentnych_volbach_v_rokoch_2002-2010_Position_of_Slovak_Regions_in_the_Light_of_Electoral_Support_for_Parties_in (accessed 12.12.2020). (In Slovak)

10. Szőllős J. Regional Stability of Electoral Support of Selected Political Parties in Slovakia, 1990–1998. Geografický časopis = Geographical Journal. 2000; 52(3):243-267. Available at: https://www.sav.sk/?lang=sk&doc=journal-list&part=article_response_page&journal_article_no=7512 (accessed 12.12.2020). (In Slovak)

11. Szöllös J. Regions of Electoral Support of Chosen Political Parties in Parliamentary Elections 1998, 2002 and 2006. Geografická revue = Geographical Review. 2006; 2(2):650-669. Available at: https://www.fpv.umb.sk/geo-revue/publikovane-cisla/2006/2-2006/ (accessed 12.12.2020). (In Slovak)

12. Kislyakov М. Station and Trends of Development of Regional Electoral Process. Regionologiya = Regionology. 2012; (1):40-44. Available at: https://regionsar.ru/ru/node/864 (accessed 12.12.2020). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

13. Chikhladze N., Chikhladze L. Modern Challenges in Establishing Financial Base of Local Self-Governance in Georgia. Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences. 2018; 12(2):176-183. Available at: http://science.org.ge/bnas/t12-n2/27_Chikhladze.pdf (accessed 12.12.2020). (In Eng.)

14. Baer J. Boxing and Politics in Slovakia: 'Meciarism' Roots, Theory, Practice. Democratization. 2001; 8(2):97-116. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/714000200

15. Deegan-Krause K. Populism, Democracy, and Nationalism in Slovakia. In: Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? / eds. C. Mudde, C. Rovira Kaltwasser. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. p. 182-204. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152365.010

16. Leška D. The Main Phases of the Formation of System of Political Parties in Slovakia After 1989. Sociológia = Slovak Sociological Review. 2013; 45(1):71-88. Available at: https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/03041249Leška - OK.pdf (accessed 12.12.2020). (In Slovak)

17. Belko M., Kopeček L. Referendum in Theory and Practice: The History of the Slovak Referendums and their Consequences. Středoevropské politické studie = Central European Political Studies Review. 2003; 5(2-3). Available at: https://journals.muni.cz/cepsr/article/view/3946/5319 (accessed 12.11.2020). (In Eng.)

18. Marušiak J. Political Party „SMER“ – in berween „Pragmatism“ and Social Democracy. Středoevropské politické studie = Central European Political Studies Review. 2006; 8(1):19-55. Available at: https://journals.muni.cz/cepsr/article/view/4162/6069 (accessed 12.11.2020). (In Czech)

19. Mesežnikov G., Gyárfášová O. National Populism in Slovakia. Bratislava; 2006. Available at: https://www.ivo.sk/5555/en/news/national-populism-in-slovakia-%E2%80%93-new-publication-by-ivo (accessed 12.11.2020). (In Eng.)

20. Spac P. Anti-Europeanism and Euroscepticism in Slovakia. European Integration and New Anti-Europeanism II / eds. P. Moreau, B. Wassenberg. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag; 2016. p. 163-180. Available at: https://www.muni.cz/en/research/publications/1351241 (accessed 12.11.2020). (In Eng.)

21. Rybář M., Spáč P., Voda Р., Nemčok M. Po stopách politického zemětřesení: Parlamentní volby na Slovensku v roce 2016. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury a Masarykova univerzita; 2017. Available at: https://www.muni.cz/vyzkum/publikace/1402718 (accessed 12.11.2020). (In Czech)

Submitted 09.02.2021; approved after reviewing 05.03.2021; accepted for publication 14.03.2021.

About the author:

Yevheniy I. Haydanka, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Trnava University (23 Hornopotočná St., Trnava 918 43, Slovakia), Cand. Sci. (Political Science), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8112-2090, Researcher ID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/M-7335-2018, Scopus ID: 57218488947, yevheniy.haydanka@truni.sk

The author has read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
To download article